• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开发工具 SDM:KOMPASS,支持共享决策制定实施过程。

"Developing the tool SDM:KOMPASS. Supporting shared decision making implementation processes".

机构信息

Center for Shared Decision Making, Lillebaelt Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark.

Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2024 Nov 18;19(11):e0312990. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312990. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0312990
PMID:39556538
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11573207/
Abstract

Shared decision-making (SDM) involves patients in choosing their treatment or care options. SDM enhances patient engagement and treatment satisfaction. SDM has proved difficult to implement and sustain in routine clinical practice, hence a supportive tool is needed. This quality improvement study focuses on the development of a generic tool, labeled SDM:KOMPASS, which is intended to support hospital settings by facilitating the visualization of their formative progress and the setting of goals for the SDM implementation into routine clinical practice. The main objective of the present paper is to describe the development of this generic tool. A six-step development process was performed to develop a tool and investigate the tool's overall perceived usability. Qualitative methods, such as observations, individual and focus group interviews, provided insights. A 10-item quantitative survey gauged informants' immediate attitudes towards the tool. Purposefully sampled informants (N = 20), including healthcare professionals and patients, contributed diverse perspectives regarding; 1) The tool's readability and clarity, 2) the construct's domains and content, and 3) the tool's perceived usability. In alignment with real-world challenges, SDM:KOMPASS emerges as a potentially valuable resource for healthcare organizations embedding SDM. The six-step development process revealed how the tool SDM:KOMPASS has potential to enhance SDM implementation's manageability, goal-setting, and focus. Professionals engaged in strategic implementation within somatic and mental hospital departments find the tool potentially beneficial and feasible. The tool shows promise and usability but requires careful attention due to its comprehensiveness. The next step is to alpha test the tool in clinical practice.

摘要

共同决策(SDM)涉及患者选择治疗或护理方案。SDM 增强了患者的参与度和治疗满意度。SDM 在常规临床实践中实施和维持证明具有挑战性,因此需要一个支持性工具。这项质量改进研究专注于开发一种通用工具,称为 SDM:KOMPASS,旨在通过促进其形成性进展的可视化和为常规临床实践中的 SDM 实施设定目标来支持医院环境。本论文的主要目的是描述该通用工具的开发。采用六步开发过程来开发工具并研究工具的整体感知可用性。定性方法,如观察、个人和焦点小组访谈,提供了见解。一项 10 项的定量调查衡量了受访者对工具的即时态度。有目的抽样的受访者(N = 20),包括医疗保健专业人员和患者,就以下方面提供了不同的观点;1)工具的可读性和清晰度,2)构建的领域和内容,以及 3)工具的感知可用性。与现实世界的挑战相一致,SDM:KOMPASS 作为一种将 SDM 嵌入医疗保健组织的潜在有价值的资源出现。六步开发过程揭示了工具 SDM:KOMPASS 如何具有增强 SDM 实施的可管理性、目标设定和重点的潜力。参与躯体和精神医院部门战略实施的专业人员认为该工具具有潜在的益处和可行性。该工具显示出前景和可用性,但由于其全面性需要谨慎关注。下一步是在临床实践中对工具进行 alpha 测试。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1ed/11573207/7b4e52e9fd13/pone.0312990.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1ed/11573207/44e6a0f8f85e/pone.0312990.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1ed/11573207/0da3efeece50/pone.0312990.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1ed/11573207/7b4e52e9fd13/pone.0312990.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1ed/11573207/44e6a0f8f85e/pone.0312990.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1ed/11573207/0da3efeece50/pone.0312990.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1ed/11573207/7b4e52e9fd13/pone.0312990.g003.jpg

相似文献

1
"Developing the tool SDM:KOMPASS. Supporting shared decision making implementation processes".开发工具 SDM:KOMPASS,支持共享决策制定实施过程。
PLoS One. 2024 Nov 18;19(11):e0312990. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312990. eCollection 2024.
2
Normalization of a conversation tool to promote shared decision making about anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation within a practical randomized trial of its effectiveness: a cross-sectional study.在一项关于其有效性的实用随机试验中,使一种促进心房颤动患者抗凝治疗共同决策的对话工具正常化:一项横断面研究。
Trials. 2020 May 12;21(1):395. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04305-2.
3
Adaptation and Implementation of a Shared Decision-Making Tool From One Health Context to Another: Partnership Approach Using Mixed Methods.从一个健康背景到另一个健康背景的共享决策工具的调整和实施:使用混合方法的伙伴关系方法。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jul 5;25:e42551. doi: 10.2196/42551.
4
Developing STEP-SE: A Qualitative Usability Study of a Novel Patient-Reported Outcomes Tool for Managing Side Effects in Shared Decision-Making for Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorder Care.开发 STEP-SE:用于管理精神分裂症谱系障碍护理中共享决策副作用的新型患者报告结局工具的定性可用性研究。
Health Expect. 2024 Dec;27(6):e70019. doi: 10.1111/hex.70019.
5
Barriers and facilitators of healthcare professionals in integrating shared decision-making in pancreatic cancer treatment: A network approach.医疗专业人员在胰腺癌治疗中整合共享决策的障碍和促进因素:网络方法。
Cancer Med. 2024 Oct;13(19):e70218. doi: 10.1002/cam4.70218.
6
"SDM:HOSP"- a generic model for hospital-based implementation of shared decision making.“SDM:HOSP”- 一种基于医院的共享决策制定实施的通用模型。
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 24;18(1):e0280547. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280547. eCollection 2023.
7
Beyond pros and cons - developing a patient decision aid to cultivate dialog to build relationships: insights from a qualitative study and decision aid development.超越利弊 - 开发患者决策辅助工具以培养对话建立关系:来自定性研究和决策辅助工具开发的见解。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019 Sep 18;19(1):186. doi: 10.1186/s12911-019-0898-5.
8
Fostering Shared Decision-Making Between Patients and Health Care Professionals in Clinical Practice Guidelines: Protocol for a Project to Develop and Test a Tool for Guideline Developers.在临床实践指南中促进患者和医疗保健专业人员之间的共享决策:为指南制定者开发和测试工具的项目的方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Nov 4;13:e57611. doi: 10.2196/57611.
9
What do stakeholders need to implement shared decision making in routine cancer care? A qualitative needs assessment.利益相关者在常规癌症护理中实施共同决策需要什么?一项定性需求评估。
Acta Oncol. 2016 Dec;55(12):1484-1491. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2016.1227087. Epub 2016 Sep 8.
10
Shared decision-making in the treatment of adolescents diagnosed with depression: A cross-sectional survey of mental health professionals in China.中国青少年抑郁症治疗中的共享决策:精神卫生专业人员的横断面调查。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2024 Jun;31(3):340-351. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12990. Epub 2023 Oct 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Shared decision making - a review of its evaluation, efficacy, and applicability in asthma.共同决策——对其在哮喘中的评估、疗效及适用性的综述
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Aug 12;12:1639805. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1639805. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
The Six Steps of SDM: linking theory to practice, measurement and implementation.共享决策制定的六个步骤:将理论与实践、测量及实施相联系。
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2024 Mar 21;29(2):75-78. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2023-112289.
2
"SDM:HOSP"- a generic model for hospital-based implementation of shared decision making.“SDM:HOSP”- 一种基于医院的共享决策制定实施的通用模型。
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 24;18(1):e0280547. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280547. eCollection 2023.
3
Implementation of patient-centred care in Denmark: The way forward with shared decision-making.
丹麦实施以患者为中心的护理:通过共同决策推进
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2022 Jun;171:36-41. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2022.04.005. Epub 2022 May 21.
4
Practitioners' views on shared decision-making implementation: A qualitative study.从业者对共同决策实施的看法:一项定性研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 11;16(11):e0259844. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259844. eCollection 2021.
5
Barriers and facilitators to shared decision-making in hospitals from policy to practice: a systematic review.医院中从政策到实践的共享决策的障碍和促进因素:系统评价。
Implement Sci. 2021 Jul 31;16(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s13012-021-01142-y.
6
Systematic Development of Patient Decision Aids: An Update from the IPDAS Collaboration.系统开发患者决策辅助工具:来自 IPDAS 合作组织的最新更新。
Med Decis Making. 2021 Oct;41(7):736-754. doi: 10.1177/0272989X211014163. Epub 2021 Jun 19.
7
What Works in Implementing Patient Decision Aids in Routine Clinical Settings? A Rapid Realist Review and Update from the International Patient Decision Aid Standards Collaboration.在常规临床环境中实施患者决策辅助工具的有效方法有哪些?国际患者决策辅助标准协作的快速务实综述和更新。
Med Decis Making. 2021 Oct;41(7):907-937. doi: 10.1177/0272989X20978208. Epub 2020 Dec 15.
8
Making shared decision-making (SDM) a reality: protocol of a large-scale long-term SDM implementation programme at a Northern German University Hospital.让共同决策(SDM)成为现实:德国北部一家大学医院大规模长期实施SDM项目的方案
BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 10;10(10):e037575. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037575.
9
SQUIRE-EDU (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence in Education): Publication Guidelines for Educational Improvement.SQUIRE-EDU(教育卓越质量改进报告标准):教育改进出版物指南。
Acad Med. 2019 Oct;94(10):1461-1470. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002750.
10
The importance of content and face validity in instrument development: lessons learnt from service users when developing the Recovering Quality of Life measure (ReQoL).内容和表面有效性在工具开发中的重要性:从服务使用者在开发“恢复生活质量量表”(ReQoL)时吸取的经验教训。
Qual Life Res. 2018 Jul;27(7):1893-1902. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1847-y. Epub 2018 Apr 19.