School of Psychology, University of Reading Malaysia, Nusajaya, Johor, Malaysia.
School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, Berkshire, UK.
J Clin Nurs. 2018 Jan;27(1-2):193-204. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13871. Epub 2017 Jul 3.
While haemodialysis is an effective treatment for end-stage renal disease, the requirements and restrictions it imposes on patients can be onerous. The aim of this study was to obtain UK National Health Service patients' perspectives on the challenges arising from haemodialysis with the intention of identifying potential improvements.
Depression rates are particularly high in those with end-stage renal disease; however, there is limited insight into the range of stressors associated with haemodialysis treatment within the National Health Service contributing to such high rates, particularly those of a cognitive or psychological nature.
A qualitative approach was used to obtain rich, patient-focused data; one-to-one semi-structured interviews were conducted with twenty end-stage renal disease at a UK National Health Service centre.
Patients were interviewed during a typical haemodialysis session. Thematic analysis was used to systematically interpret the data. Codes were created in an inductive and cyclical process using a constant comparative approach.
Three themes emerged from the data: (i) fluctuations in cognitive/physical well-being across the haemodialysis cycle, (ii) restrictions arising from the haemodialysis treatment schedule, (iii) emotional impact of haemodialysis on the self and others. The findings are limited to predominantly white, older patients (median = 74 years) within a National Health Service setting.
Several of the experiences reported by patients as challenging and distressing have so far been overlooked in the literature. A holistic-based approach to treatment, acknowledging all aspects of a patient's well-being, is essential if optimal quality of life is to be achieved by healthcare providers.
The findings can be used to inform future interventions and guidelines aimed at improving patients' treatment adherence and outcomes, for example, improved reliable access to mental health specialists.
虽然血液透析是治疗终末期肾病的有效方法,但它对患者的要求和限制可能是繁重的。本研究的目的是了解英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)患者对血液透析带来的挑战的看法,以期发现潜在的改进措施。
终末期肾病患者的抑郁率特别高;然而,对于导致如此高比率的与血液透析治疗相关的压力源范围,尤其是认知或心理性质的压力源,NHS 内的了解有限。
采用定性方法获取丰富的、以患者为中心的数据;在英国 NHS 中心对 20 名终末期肾病患者进行了一对一的半结构化访谈。
在典型的血液透析过程中对患者进行访谈。使用主题分析系统地解释数据。使用恒定性比较方法,在归纳和循环过程中创建代码。
数据中出现了三个主题:(i)血液透析周期中认知/身体状况的波动,(ii)血液透析治疗计划带来的限制,(iii)血液透析对自我和他人的情绪影响。研究结果仅限于 NHS 环境中主要为白人、年龄较大的患者(中位数=74 岁)。
患者报告的一些具有挑战性和令人痛苦的经历在文献中迄今为止一直被忽视。如果医疗保健提供者要实现最佳生活质量,就需要采用整体治疗方法,承认患者福祉的所有方面。
这些发现可用于为未来的干预措施和指南提供信息,旨在提高患者的治疗依从性和结果,例如,改善可靠获得心理健康专家的机会。