Suppr超能文献

肾科医护人员对腹膜透析患者向中心血液透析过渡体验的理解,以及他们对服务改进的看法:一项在英格兰和澳大利亚的多地点定性研究。

Renal staffs' understanding of patients' experiences of transition from peritoneal dialysis to in-centre haemodialysis and their views on service improvement: A multi-site qualitative study in England and Australia.

机构信息

Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom.

Health Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 Jul 19;16(7):e0254931. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254931. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Many studies have explored patients' experiences of dialysis and other treatments for kidney failure. This is the first qualitative multi-site international study of how staff perceive the process of a patient's transition from peritoneal dialysis to in-centre haemodialysis. Current literature suggests that transitions are poorly coordinated and may result in increased patient morbidity and mortality. This study aimed to understand staff perspectives of transition and to identify areas where clinical practice could be improved.

METHODS

Sixty-one participants (24 UK and 37 Australia), representing a cross-section of kidney care staff, took part in seven focus groups and sixteen interviews. Data were analysed inductively and findings were synthesised across the two countries.

RESULTS

For staff, good clinical practice included: effective communication with patients, well planned care pathways and continuity of care. However, staff felt that how they communicated with patients about the treatment journey could be improved. Staff worried they inadvertently made patients fear haemodialysis when trying to explain to them why going onto peritoneal dialysis first is a good option. Despite staff efforts to make transitions smooth, good continuity of care between modalities was only reported in some of the Australian hospitals where, unlike the UK, patients kept the same consultant. Timely access to an appropriate service, such as a psychologist or social worker, was not always available when staff felt it would be beneficial for the patient. Staff were aware of a disparity in access to kidney care and other healthcare professional services between some patient groups, especially those living in remote areas. This was often put down to the lack of funding and capacity within each hospital.

CONCLUSIONS

This research found that continuity of care between modalities was valued by staff but did not always happen. It also highlighted a number of areas for consideration when developing ways to improve care and provide appropriate support to patients as they transition from peritoneal dialysis to in-centre haemodialysis.

摘要

介绍

许多研究都探讨了患者对透析和其他肾衰竭治疗方法的体验。这是第一项关于工作人员如何看待患者从腹膜透析转为中心血液透析过程的定性多地点国际研究。现有文献表明,过渡过程协调不善,可能导致患者发病率和死亡率增加。本研究旨在了解工作人员对过渡的看法,并确定可以改进临床实践的领域。

方法

61 名参与者(英国 24 名,澳大利亚 37 名),代表了肾脏护理人员的一个横截面,参加了 7 个焦点小组和 16 次访谈。数据进行了归纳分析,并在两个国家综合了研究结果。

结果

对工作人员而言,良好的临床实践包括:与患者进行有效的沟通、精心规划的护理路径和护理的连续性。然而,工作人员认为他们与患者就治疗过程进行沟通的方式可以得到改善。工作人员担心,当他们试图向患者解释为什么首先进行腹膜透析是一个好的选择时,他们会无意中使患者对血液透析感到恐惧。尽管工作人员努力使过渡顺利进行,但只有在澳大利亚的一些医院中报告了模式之间良好的连续性护理,而在英国,与澳大利亚不同,患者保留了相同的顾问。当工作人员认为对患者有益时,及时获得适当的服务(如心理学家或社会工作者)并不总是可行的。工作人员意识到,一些患者群体在获得肾脏护理和其他医疗保健专业服务方面存在差距,尤其是居住在偏远地区的患者。这通常归因于每个医院缺乏资金和能力。

结论

这项研究发现,模式之间的护理连续性受到工作人员的重视,但并不总是存在。它还强调了在制定改善护理和为从腹膜透析转为中心血液透析的患者提供适当支持的方法时需要考虑的一些领域。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验