Suppr超能文献

哪种情况更糟?原发性或复发性子宫内膜异位症妇女的 ART 结局比较。

Which is worse? Comparison of ART outcome between women with primary or recurrent endometriomas.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Koc University School of Medicine, Davutpasa Caddesi No 4, Topkapi, Istanbul 34010, Turkey.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Sihhiye, Ankara 06100, Turkey.

出版信息

Hum Reprod. 2017 Jul 1;32(7):1427-1431. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex099.

Abstract

STUDY QUESTİON: Are live birth rates (LBR) different after ART cycles between women with primary or recurrent endometrioma?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Women with recurrent endometrioma have similar LBR as compared to patients with primary endometrioma.

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN

Recurrence rate can be as high as 29% after endometrioma excision. Prior studies on management of endometrioma before ART involve primary endometriomas. There is limited information regarding the prognosis of women with recurrent endometriomas.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A multicenter retrospective cohort study, including 76 women with primary and 82 women with recurrent endometriomas treated at the participating centers over a 6-year period.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Women with endometrioma who underwent ART at three academic ART centers. Couples with another indication for ART were excluded.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

Female age, median number of prior failed ART cycles, proportion of patients with bilateral endometrioma (28 versus 28.9%), ovarian stimulation protocols, and total gonadotropin consumption were similar between the study groups. Numbers of metaphase two oocytes (5 versus 6), number of embryos transferred, and the proportion of patients undergoing blastocyst transfer were similar across the study groups. Clinical pregnancy rates (36.6 versus 34.2%, absolute difference 2.4%, 95% CI: -12.5 to 17.3%, P = 0.83) and LBR (35.4 versus 30.3%, absolute difference 5.1%, 95% CI: -9.5 to 19.7%, P = 0.51) per started cycle in recurrent and primary endometrioma were similar. Comparable success rates were also confirmed with logistic regression analysis (OR: 1.14, 95% CI: 0.78-0.57, P = 2.3).

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The retrospective design has inherent limitations. Some women with severely decreased ovarian reserve after primary endometrioma excision may not have pursued further treatment.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

The management of endometrioma prior to ART is controversial but a different management strategy is not required for recurrent endometriomas. Since recurrent endometriomas do not have a worse impact on ART outcome than primary endometriomas, and repeat surgery has a higher risk for complications, conservative management without surgery can be justified.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): No funding or competing interests to declare.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

None.

摘要

研究问题

原发性或复发性子宫内膜异位症患者接受辅助生殖技术(ART)后活产率(LBR)是否不同?

总结答案

复发性子宫内膜异位症患者的 LBR 与原发性子宫内膜异位症患者相似。

已知内容

子宫内膜异位症切除后复发率可高达 29%。先前关于 ART 前子宫内膜异位症管理的研究涉及原发性子宫内膜异位症。关于复发性子宫内膜异位症患者的预后信息有限。

研究设计、大小和持续时间:这是一项多中心回顾性队列研究,包括在 6 年内参加研究的 76 名原发性和 82 名复发性子宫内膜异位症患者。

参与者/材料、地点和方法:在三个学术 ART 中心接受 ART 的子宫内膜异位症患者。排除因其他原因接受 ART 的夫妇。

主要结果和机会的作用

研究组之间女性年龄、中位数既往 ART 失败周期数、双侧子宫内膜异位症患者比例(28%与 28.9%)、卵巢刺激方案和总促性腺激素消耗相似。研究组之间的中期 II 卵母细胞数量(5 与 6)、转移胚胎数量以及行囊胚转移的患者比例相似。每个起始周期的临床妊娠率(36.6%与 34.2%,绝对差异 2.4%,95%CI:-12.5 至 17.3%,P=0.83)和 LBR(35.4%与 30.3%,绝对差异 5.1%,95%CI:-9.5 至 19.7%,P=0.51)在复发性和原发性子宫内膜异位症中相似。逻辑回归分析也证实了可比的成功率(OR:1.14,95%CI:0.78-0.57,P=2.3)。

局限性、谨慎的原因:回顾性设计具有内在局限性。一些原发性子宫内膜异位症切除后卵巢储备严重下降的女性可能不会继续接受治疗。

研究结果的更广泛影响

ART 前子宫内膜异位症的管理存在争议,但不需要对复发性子宫内膜异位症采取不同的管理策略。由于复发性子宫内膜异位症对 ART 结果的影响并不比原发性子宫内膜异位症差,并且重复手术的并发症风险更高,因此可以证明不进行手术的保守治疗是合理的。

研究资金/利益冲突:无资金或利益冲突声明。

试验注册编号

无。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验