• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

欧洲严重精神疾病患者的临床决策制定和精神卫生服务利用。

Clinical Decision Making and Mental Health Service Use Among Persons With Severe Mental Illness Across Europe.

机构信息

Dr. Cosh, Ms. Zenter, Ms. Ay, Dr. Loos, and Dr. Puschner are with the Department of Psychiatry II, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany. Prof. Slade is with the Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom. Dr. De Rosa and Dr. Luciano are with the Department of Psychiatry, University of Naples SUN, Naples. Dr. Berecz and Dr. Glaub are with the University of Debrecen Medical and Health Science Center, Debrecen, Hungary. Prof. Munk-Jørgensen is with the Department for Organic Psychiatric Disorders, Aarhus University, Risskov, Denmark. Ms. Krogsgaard Bording is with the Unit for Psychiatric Research, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark. Prof. Rössler and Dr. Kawohl are with the University Hospital of Psychiatry, University of Zurich, Zurich.

出版信息

Psychiatr Serv. 2017 Sep 1;68(9):970-974. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201600114. Epub 2017 May 15.

DOI:10.1176/appi.ps.201600114
PMID:28502242
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The study explored relationships between preferences for and experiences of clinical decision making (CDM) with service use among persons with severe mental illness.

METHODS

Data from a prospective observational study in six European countries were examined. Associations of baseline staff-rated (N=213) and patient-rated (N=588) preferred and experienced decision making with service use were examined at baseline by using binomial regressions and at 12-month follow-up by using multilevel models.

RESULTS

A preference by patients and staff for active patient involvement in decision making, rather than shared or passive decision making, was associated with longer hospital admissions and higher costs at baseline and with increases in admissions over 12 months (p=.043). Low patient-rated satisfaction with an experienced clinical decision was also related to increased costs over the study period (p=.005).

CONCLUSIONS

A preference for shared decision making may reduce health care costs by reducing inpatient admissions. Patient satisfaction with decisions was a predictor of costs, and clinicians should maximize patient satisfaction with CDM.

摘要

目的

本研究探讨了严重精神疾病患者对临床决策(CDM)的偏好和体验与服务利用之间的关系。

方法

对来自六个欧洲国家的前瞻性观察性研究的数据进行了检查。基线时,使用二项式回归检查了基线时工作人员(N=213)和患者(N=588)评定的偏好和体验决策与服务利用之间的关联,并在 12 个月随访时使用多层模型进行了检查。

结果

患者和工作人员偏爱积极参与决策,而不是共享或被动决策,这与基线时的住院时间延长和费用增加以及 12 个月内的住院人数增加有关(p=.043)。患者对临床决策体验的低满意度也与研究期间费用的增加有关(p=.005)。

结论

共享决策的偏好可能通过减少住院人数来降低医疗保健成本。患者对决策的满意度是成本的预测因素,临床医生应最大限度地提高患者对 CDM 的满意度。

相似文献

1
Clinical Decision Making and Mental Health Service Use Among Persons With Severe Mental Illness Across Europe.欧洲严重精神疾病患者的临床决策制定和精神卫生服务利用。
Psychiatr Serv. 2017 Sep 1;68(9):970-974. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201600114. Epub 2017 May 15.
2
Clinical decision making and outcome in the routine care of people with severe mental illness across Europe (CEDAR).欧洲严重精神疾病患者常规护理中的临床决策和结果(CEDAR)。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2016 Feb;25(1):69-79. doi: 10.1017/S204579601400078X. Epub 2015 Jan 20.
3
Empowerment and satisfaction in a multinational study of routine clinical practice.一项关于常规临床实践的跨国研究中的赋权与满意度
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2015 May;131(5):369-78. doi: 10.1111/acps.12365. Epub 2014 Dec 4.
4
Effects of Clinical Decision Topic on Patients' Involvement in and Satisfaction With Decisions and Their Subsequent Implementation.临床决策主题对患者参与决策、对决策的满意度及其后续实施的影响。
Psychiatr Serv. 2016 Jun 1;67(6):658-63. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201500083. Epub 2016 Feb 14.
5
Recovery and decision-making involvement in people with severe mental illness from six countries: a prospective observational study.六个国家严重精神疾病患者的康复及决策参与情况:一项前瞻性观察性研究
BMC Psychiatry. 2017 Jan 23;17(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s12888-017-1207-4.
6
Impact of clinical decision-making participation and satisfaction on outcomes in mental health practice: results from the CEDAR European longitudinal study.参与临床决策和满意度对精神卫生实践结果的影响:CEDAR 欧洲纵向研究的结果。
Int Rev Psychiatry. 2022 Nov-Dec;34(7-8):848-860. doi: 10.1080/09540261.2022.2085507. Epub 2022 Jun 21.
7
Services Use of Children and Adolescents before Admission to Psychiatric Inpatient Care.儿童和青少年在入住精神科住院治疗之前的服务使用情况。
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2016 Jun;19(2):103-13.
8
When does shared decision making is adopted in psychiatric clinical practice? Results from a European multicentric study.何时在精神科临床实践中采用共同决策?来自一项欧洲多中心研究的结果。
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2020 Sep;270(6):645-653. doi: 10.1007/s00406-019-01031-y. Epub 2019 Jun 7.
9
Clinical decision making and outcome in routine care for people with severe mental illness (CEDAR): study protocol.临床决策和严重精神疾病患者常规护理的结局(CEDAR):研究方案。
BMC Psychiatry. 2010 Nov 10;10:90. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-10-90.
10
Shared decision-making in serious mental illness: A comparative study.严重精神疾病中的共同决策:一项比较研究。
Patient Educ Couns. 2020 Aug;103(8):1637-1644. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.03.009. Epub 2020 Mar 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Experiencing (Shared) Decision Making: Results from a Qualitative Study of People with Mental Illness and Their Family Members.体验(共享)决策:对患有精神疾病的患者及其家庭成员的定性研究结果
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Aug 9;11(16):2237. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11162237.
2
Shared decision-making interventions for people with mental health conditions.心理健康问题患者的共同决策干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 11;11(11):CD007297. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007297.pub3.
3
Shared decision making for adults with severe mental illness: A concept analysis.
成年重度精神疾病患者的共同决策:一项概念分析。
Jpn J Nurs Sci. 2020 Oct;17(4):e12365. doi: 10.1111/jjns.12365. Epub 2020 Aug 5.