Freidl Marion, Pesola Francesca, Konrad Jana, Puschner Bernd, Kovacs Attila Istvan, De Rosa Corrado, Fiorillo Andrea, Krogsgaard Bording Malene, Kawohl Wolfram, Rössler Wulf, Nagy Marietta, Munk-Jørgensen Povl, Slade Mike
Dr. Freidl is with the Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria (e-mail:
Psychiatr Serv. 2016 Jun 1;67(6):658-63. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201500083. Epub 2016 Feb 14.
Clinical decision making is an important aspect of mental health care. Predictors of how patients experience decision making and whether decisions are implemented are underresearched. This study investigated the relationship between decision topic and involvement in the decision, satisfaction with it, and its subsequent implementation from both staff and patient perspectives.
As part of the Clinical Decision Making and Outcome in Routine Care for People With Severe Mental Illness study, patients (N=588) and their providers (N=213) were recruited from community-based mental health services in six European countries. Both completed bimonthly assessments for one year using the Clinical Decision Making in Routine Care Scale to assess the decision topic and implementation; both also completed the Clinical Decision Making Involvement and Satisfaction Scale.
Three categories of decision topics were determined: treatment (most frequently cited), social, and financial. The topic identified as most important remained stable over the follow-up. Patients were more likely to rate their involvement as active rather than passive for social decisions (odds ratio [OR]=5.7, p<.001) and financial decisions (OR=9.5, p<.001). They were more likely to report higher levels of satisfaction rather than lower levels for social decisions (OR=1.5, p=.01) and financial decisions (OR=1.7, p=.01). Social decisions were more likely to be partly implemented (OR=3.0, p<.001) or fully implemented (OR=1.7, p=.03) than not implemented.
Patients reported poorer involvement, satisfaction, and implementation in regard to treatment-related decisions, compared with social and financial decisions. Clinicians may need to employ different interactional styles for different types of decisions to maximize satisfaction and decision implementation.
临床决策是精神卫生保健的一个重要方面。关于患者如何体验决策以及决策是否得到执行的预测因素研究不足。本研究从工作人员和患者的角度调查了决策主题与参与决策、对决策的满意度及其后续执行之间的关系。
作为严重精神疾病患者常规护理中的临床决策与结果研究的一部分,从六个欧洲国家的社区精神卫生服务机构招募了患者(N = 588)及其提供者(N = 213)。双方使用常规护理中的临床决策量表进行了为期一年的双月评估,以评估决策主题和执行情况;双方还完成了临床决策参与和满意度量表。
确定了三类决策主题:治疗(提及频率最高)、社会和财务。在随访期间,被确定为最重要的主题保持稳定。对于社会决策(优势比[OR]=5.7,p<.001)和财务决策(OR = 9.5,p<.001),患者更有可能将自己的参与评定为积极而非消极。对于社会决策(OR = 1.5,p =.01)和财务决策(OR = 1.7,p =.01),他们更有可能报告较高的满意度而非较低的满意度。与未执行相比,社会决策更有可能部分执行(OR = 3.0,p<.001)或完全执行(OR = 1.7,p =.03)。
与社会和财务决策相比,患者报告在与治疗相关的决策方面参与度、满意度和执行情况较差。临床医生可能需要针对不同类型的决策采用不同的互动方式,以最大限度地提高满意度和决策执行情况。