• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床决策和严重精神疾病患者常规护理的结局(CEDAR):研究方案。

Clinical decision making and outcome in routine care for people with severe mental illness (CEDAR): study protocol.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy II, Ulm University, Ludwig-Heilmeyer-Str 2, 89312 Günzburg, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Psychiatry. 2010 Nov 10;10:90. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-10-90.

DOI:10.1186/1471-244X-10-90
PMID:21062508
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2992484/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A considerable amount of research has been conducted on clinical decision making (CDM) in short-term physical conditions. However, there is a lack of knowledge on CDM and its outcome in long-term illnesses, especially in care for people with severe mental illness.

METHODS/DESIGN: The study entitled "Clinical decision making and outcome in routine care for people with severe mental illness" (CEDAR) is carried out in six European countries (Denmark, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Switzerland and UK). First, CEDAR establishes a methodology to assess CDM in people with severe mental illness. Specific instruments are developed (and psychometric properties established) to measure CDM style, key elements of CDM in routine care, as well as CDM involvement and satisfaction from patient and therapist perspectives. Second, these instruments are being put to use in a multi-national prospective observational study (bimonthly assessments during a one-year observation period; N = 560). This study investigates the immediate, short- and long-term effect of CDM on crucial dimensions of clinical outcome (symptom level, quality of life, needs) by taking into account significant variables moderating the relationship between CDM and outcome.

DISCUSSION

The results of this study will make possible to delineate quality indicators of CDM, as well as to specify prime areas for further improvement. Ingredients of best practice in CDM in the routine care for people with severe mental illness will be extracted and recommendations formulated. With its explicit focus on the patient role in CDM, CEDAR will also contribute to strengthening the service user perspective. This project will substantially add to improving the practice of CDM in mental health care across Europe.

TRIAL REGISTER

ISRCTN75841675.

摘要

背景

已有相当数量的研究针对短期身体状况下的临床决策制定(CDM)展开,但对于长期疾病(尤其是严重精神疾病患者的护理)中的 CDM 及其结果,我们知之甚少。

方法/设计:题为“常规护理中严重精神疾病患者的临床决策制定和结果(CEDAR)”的研究在六个欧洲国家(丹麦、德国、匈牙利、意大利、瑞士和英国)开展。首先,CEDAR 制定了一种评估严重精神疾病患者 CDM 的方法。开发了特定的工具(并确定了心理测量特性),以衡量 CDM 风格、常规护理中 CDM 的关键要素,以及从患者和治疗师的角度来看的 CDM 参与度和满意度。其次,这些工具将在一项多国家前瞻性观察研究(为期一年的观察期内每两个月评估一次;N=560)中使用。该研究通过考虑调节 CDM 与结果之间关系的重要变量,调查 CDM 对临床结果关键维度(症状水平、生活质量、需求)的即时、短期和长期影响。

讨论

该研究的结果将有可能描绘出 CDM 的质量指标,并确定进一步改进的主要领域。将提取出严重精神疾病患者常规护理中 CDM 的最佳实践要素,并制定建议。CEDAR 明确关注 CDM 中患者的角色,也将有助于加强服务使用者的视角。该项目将极大地促进欧洲各地改善精神卫生保健中的 CDM 实践。

试验注册

ISRCTN75841675。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/350d/2992484/7f452565681f/1471-244X-10-90-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/350d/2992484/8c8901ff9b7d/1471-244X-10-90-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/350d/2992484/7f452565681f/1471-244X-10-90-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/350d/2992484/8c8901ff9b7d/1471-244X-10-90-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/350d/2992484/7f452565681f/1471-244X-10-90-2.jpg

相似文献

1
Clinical decision making and outcome in routine care for people with severe mental illness (CEDAR): study protocol.临床决策和严重精神疾病患者常规护理的结局(CEDAR):研究方案。
BMC Psychiatry. 2010 Nov 10;10:90. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-10-90.
2
Clinical decision making and outcome in the routine care of people with severe mental illness across Europe (CEDAR).欧洲严重精神疾病患者常规护理中的临床决策和结果(CEDAR)。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2016 Feb;25(1):69-79. doi: 10.1017/S204579601400078X. Epub 2015 Jan 20.
3
Development and psychometric properties of a five-language multiperspective instrument to assess clinical decision making style in the treatment of people with severe mental illness (CDMS).开发和心理计量特性的五语言多角度工具评估临床决策风格在治疗严重精神疾病患者 (CDMS)。
BMC Psychiatry. 2013 Feb 4;13:48. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-13-48.
4
Impact of clinical decision-making participation and satisfaction on outcomes in mental health practice: results from the CEDAR European longitudinal study.参与临床决策和满意度对精神卫生实践结果的影响:CEDAR 欧洲纵向研究的结果。
Int Rev Psychiatry. 2022 Nov-Dec;34(7-8):848-860. doi: 10.1080/09540261.2022.2085507. Epub 2022 Jun 21.
5
When does shared decision making is adopted in psychiatric clinical practice? Results from a European multicentric study.何时在精神科临床实践中采用共同决策?来自一项欧洲多中心研究的结果。
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2020 Sep;270(6):645-653. doi: 10.1007/s00406-019-01031-y. Epub 2019 Jun 7.
6
Participation in medical decision-making across Europe: An international longitudinal multicenter study.欧洲范围内参与医疗决策:一项国际纵向多中心研究。
Eur Psychiatry. 2016 May;35:39-46. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2016.02.001. Epub 2016 Apr 7.
7
Desire for information of people with severe mental illness.重度精神疾病患者对信息的需求。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2014 Dec;49(12):1883-91. doi: 10.1007/s00127-014-0901-5. Epub 2014 Jun 7.
8
Recovery and decision-making involvement in people with severe mental illness from six countries: a prospective observational study.六个国家严重精神疾病患者的康复及决策参与情况:一项前瞻性观察性研究
BMC Psychiatry. 2017 Jan 23;17(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s12888-017-1207-4.
9
Content and implementation of clinical decisions in the routine care of people with severe mental illness.重度精神疾病患者常规护理中临床决策的内容与实施
J Ment Health. 2015 Feb;24(1):15-9. doi: 10.3109/09638237.2014.951478.
10
Clinical Decision Making and Mental Health Service Use Among Persons With Severe Mental Illness Across Europe.欧洲严重精神疾病患者的临床决策制定和精神卫生服务利用。
Psychiatr Serv. 2017 Sep 1;68(9):970-974. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201600114. Epub 2017 May 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Preferences for Decision-Making Style and Knowledge of and Attitudes To Recovery in Mental Health Professionals Working in Inpatient and Outpatient Settings in Routine Mental Health Practice: An Exploratory Cross-Sectional Study in the Danish Mental Health Services.常规精神卫生实践中住院和门诊环境下精神卫生专业人员的决策风格偏好以及对康复的认知和态度:丹麦精神卫生服务机构的一项探索性横断面研究
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2025 Sep 13. doi: 10.1007/s10488-025-01472-9.
2
Clinical characterization and management of persons with comorbid epilepsy and depression: an expert opinion paper.癫痫与抑郁症共病患者的临床特征与管理:一篇专家意见论文。
Front Pharmacol. 2025 Jul 1;16:1592650. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1592650. eCollection 2025.
3

本文引用的文献

1
The Munich 15-year follow-up study (MUFUSSAD) on first-hospitalized patients with schizophrenic or affective disorders: assessing courses, types and time stability of diagnostic classification.慕尼黑首发精神分裂症或情感障碍患者 15 年随访研究(MUFUSSAD):评估诊断分类的病程、类型和时间稳定性。
Eur Psychiatry. 2011 May;26(4):231-43. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2010.04.012. Epub 2011 Feb 15.
2
Development and evaluation of a patient-rated version of the Camberwell Assessment of Need short appraisal schedule (CANSAS-P).坎伯韦尔需求评估简短评定量表患者自评版(CANSAS-P)的开发与评估。
Community Ment Health J. 2008 Apr;44(2):113-24. doi: 10.1007/s10597-007-9101-z. Epub 2007 Aug 16.
3
Analysis of factors that promote the participation of patients with chronic diseases in shared decision making on medication: a cross-sectional survey in Hubei Province, China.
分析促进慢性病患者参与药物治疗共享决策的因素:中国湖北省的横断面调查。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Dec 6;23(1):2440. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-17099-0.
4
Validation of the Chinese version stage of recovery instrument-30 (STORI-30) for adults with severe mental illness.中文版本阶段康复评估工具-30 (STORI-30)用于评估成年人严重精神疾病的验证。
BMC Psychiatry. 2023 Jul 4;23(1):485. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-04954-y.
5
Clinical decision-making style preferences of European psychiatrists: Results from the Ambassadors survey in 38 countries.欧洲精神科医生的临床决策风格偏好:来自 38 个国家的大使调查结果。
Eur Psychiatry. 2022 Oct 21;65(1):e75. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2022.2330.
6
Shared and Supported Decision Making in Medication in a Mental Health Setting: How Far Have We Come?精神卫生环境中的药物共享和共同决策:我们已经走了多远?
Community Ment Health J. 2021 Nov;57(8):1566-1578. doi: 10.1007/s10597-021-00780-2. Epub 2021 Feb 5.
7
Predicting the preferences for involvement in medical decision making among patients with mental disorders.预测精神障碍患者参与医疗决策的偏好。
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 24;12(8):e0182203. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182203. eCollection 2017.
8
Implementing shared decision making in routine mental health care.在常规精神卫生保健中实施共同决策。
World Psychiatry. 2017 Jun;16(2):146-153. doi: 10.1002/wps.20412.
9
Recovery and decision-making involvement in people with severe mental illness from six countries: a prospective observational study.六个国家严重精神疾病患者的康复及决策参与情况:一项前瞻性观察性研究
BMC Psychiatry. 2017 Jan 23;17(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s12888-017-1207-4.
10
Risk assessment by client and case manager for shared decision making in outpatient forensic psychiatry.由患者和个案管理员共同进行风险评估,以实现门诊法医精神病学中的共享决策。
BMC Psychiatry. 2015 May 27;15:120. doi: 10.1186/s12888-015-0500-3.
Effectiveness of strategies for informing, educating, and involving patients.
告知、教育患者并让患者参与其中的策略的有效性。
BMJ. 2007 Jul 7;335(7609):24-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39246.581169.80.
4
Trust, choice and power in mental health: a literature review.心理健康中的信任、选择与权力:文献综述
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2006 Nov;41(11):843-52. doi: 10.1007/s00127-006-0123-6. Epub 2006 Oct 27.
5
Stages of recovery instrument: development of a measure of recovery from serious mental illness.康复阶段量表:一种用于衡量严重精神疾病康复情况的测量工具的开发
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2006 Nov-Dec;40(11-12):972-80. doi: 10.1080/j.1440-1614.2006.01921.x.
6
Use of standardised outcome measures in adult mental health services: randomised controlled trial.标准化结局测量在成人心理健康服务中的应用:随机对照试验。
Br J Psychiatry. 2006 Oct;189:330-6. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.105.015412.
7
Shared decision making for in-patients with schizophrenia.精神分裂症住院患者的共同决策
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2006 Oct;114(4):265-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2006.00798.x.
8
Aftercare intervention through text messaging in the treatment of bulimia nervosa--feasibility pilot.通过短信进行贪食症治疗的后续护理干预——可行性试点研究
Int J Eat Disord. 2006 Dec;39(8):633-8. doi: 10.1002/eat.20272.
9
Patient involvement in treatment decision-making: the case for a broader conceptual framework.患者参与治疗决策:构建更广泛概念框架的理由。
Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Nov;63(3):268-78. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2006.05.002. Epub 2006 Jul 27.
10
The assessment of depressive patients' involvement in decision making in audio-taped primary care consultations.对抑郁症患者在录音的初级保健会诊中参与决策情况的评估。
Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Nov;63(3):314-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2006.04.006. Epub 2006 Jul 26.