Bentz Dale P, Ferraris Chiara F, Jones Scott Z, Lootens Didier, Zunino Franco
National Institute of Standards and Technology, Materials and Structural Systems Division, 100 Bureau Drive, Stop 8615, Gaithersburg, MD 20899 USA.
Sika Technology AG- Central Research, Tueffenwies 16 CH-8048, Zurich, SWITZERLAND.
Cem Concr Compos. 2017 Apr;78:43-56. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2017.01.001. Epub 2017 Jan 5.
Developing functional concrete mixtures with less ordinary portland cement (OPC) has been one of the key objectives of the 21 century sustainability movement. While the supplies of many alternatives to OPC (such as fly ash or slag) may be limited, those of limestone and silica powders produced by crushing rocks seem virtually endless. The present study examines the chemical and physical influences of these powders on the rheology, hydration, and setting of cement-based materials via experiments and three-dimensional microstructural modeling. It is shown that both limestone and silica particle surfaces are active templates (sites) for the nucleation and growth of cement hydration products, while the limestone itself is also somewhat soluble, leading to the formation of carboaluminate hydration products. Because the filler particles are incorporated as active members of the percolated backbone that constitutes initial setting of a cement-based system, replacements of up to 50 % of the OPC by either of these powders on a volumetric basis have minimal impact on the initial setting time, and even a paste with only 5 % OPC and 95 % limestone powder by volume achieves initial set within 24 h. While their influence on setting is similar, the limestone and silica powders produce pastes with quite different rheological properties, when substituted at the same volume level. When proceeding from setting to later age strength development, one must also consider the dilution of the system due to cement removal, along with the solubility/reactivity of the filler. However, for applications where controlled (prompt) setting is more critical than developing high strengths, such as mortar tile adhesives, grouts, and renderings, significant levels of these powder replacements for cement can serve as sustainable, functional alternatives to the oft-employed 100 % OPC products.
开发使用较少普通硅酸盐水泥(OPC)的功能性混凝土混合物一直是21世纪可持续发展运动的关键目标之一。虽然许多OPC替代品(如粉煤灰或矿渣)的供应可能有限,但通过破碎岩石生产的石灰石和硅粉的供应似乎几乎无穷无尽。本研究通过实验和三维微观结构建模,研究了这些粉末对水泥基材料的流变学、水化和凝结的化学和物理影响。结果表明,石灰石和硅颗粒表面都是水泥水化产物成核和生长的活性模板(位点),而石灰石本身也有一定的溶解性,导致形成碳铝酸盐水化产物。由于填充颗粒作为构成水泥基系统初始凝结的渗流骨架的活性成分被引入,以体积计用这些粉末中的任何一种替代高达50%的OPC对初始凝结时间的影响最小,甚至一种体积比仅含5%OPC和95%石灰石粉的浆体在24小时内就能达到初始凝结。虽然它们对凝结的影响相似,但当以相同体积水平替代时,石灰石和硅粉产生的浆体具有截然不同的流变特性。从凝结到后期强度发展的过程中,还必须考虑由于水泥去除导致的系统稀释,以及填料的溶解性/反应性。然而,对于诸如瓷砖胶泥、灌浆料和抹灰等控制(快速)凝结比发展高强度更关键的应用,这些粉末大量替代水泥可作为常用的100%OPC产品的可持续、功能性替代品。