关节镜下双排与单排修复技术治疗全层肩袖撕裂术后再撕裂率的临床影像学评估
Clinico-radiological evaluation of retear rate in arthroscopic double row versus single row repair technique in full thickness rotator cuff tear.
作者信息
Wade Roshan, Salgar Sameer
机构信息
Dept. of Orthopaedics, Seth G.S. Medical College and KEM Hospital, Parel, Mumbai, India.
出版信息
J Orthop. 2017 May 3;14(2):313-318. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2017.01.001. eCollection 2017 Jun.
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Rotator cuff tear is most troublesome issue in shoulder surgery. Retear is seen in arthroscopically repaired rotator cuff tear.
PURPOSE
The functional outcome and retear rate in primary full thickness rotator cuff tear operated by single and double row repair technique.
METHODS
56 cases with full thickness tear of rotator cuff operated by single or double (28 each) were studied. Retear rate is evaluated after at least 6 months after surgery.
RESULTS
There was a statistical difference in retear rate between double row and single row repair (p value <0.01).
CONCLUSION
Retear rate is low in double row repair technique.
摘要
背景
肩袖撕裂是肩部手术中最棘手的问题。在关节镜修复肩袖撕裂中可见再次撕裂。
目的
采用单排和双排修复技术治疗原发性全层肩袖撕裂的功能结果和再次撕裂率。
方法
研究了56例采用单排或双排（各28例）手术治疗的肩袖全层撕裂患者。在术后至少6个月后评估再次撕裂率。
结果
双排和单排修复的再次撕裂率存在统计学差异（p值<0.01）。
结论
双排修复技术的再次撕裂率较低。
相似文献
1
Clinico-radiological evaluation of retear rate in arthroscopic double row versus single row repair technique in full thickness rotator cuff tear.关节镜下双排与单排修复技术治疗全层肩袖撕裂术后再撕裂率的临床影像学评估
J Orthop. 2017 May 3;14(2):313-318. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2017.01.001. eCollection 2017 Jun.
2
The Clinical Effect of a Rotator Cuff Retear: A Meta-analysis of Arthroscopic Single-Row and Double-Row Repairs.肩袖撕裂的临床效果：关节镜下单排和双排修复的Meta分析
Am J Sports Med. 2017 Mar;45(3):733-741. doi: 10.1177/0363546516652900. Epub 2016 Jul 21.
3
Clinical Outcomes of Modified Mason-Allen Single-Row Repair for Bursal-Sided Partial-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears: Comparison With the Double-Row Suture-Bridge Technique.改良梅森-艾伦单排修复术治疗滑囊侧部分厚度肩袖撕裂的临床结果：与双排缝线桥技术的比较
Am J Sports Med. 2015 Aug;43(8):1976-82. doi: 10.1177/0363546515587718. Epub 2015 Jun 8.
4
Evaluation of the Risk Factors for a Rotator Cuff Retear After Repair Surgery.修复手术后肩袖撕裂的危险因素评估
Am J Sports Med. 2017 Jul;45(8):1755-1761. doi: 10.1177/0363546517695234. Epub 2017 Mar 20.
5
Retear patterns after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: single-row versus suture bridge technique.关节镜下肩袖修复术后的再撕裂模式：单排与缝线桥技术。
Am J Sports Med. 2010 Apr;38(4):664-71. doi: 10.1177/0363546509350081. Epub 2009 Dec 29.
6
Functional and structural outcomes of single-row versus double-row versus combined double-row and suture-bridge repair for rotator cuff tears.单排与双排与双排结合缝线桥接修复肩袖撕裂的功能和结构结果。
Am J Sports Med. 2011 Oct;39(10):2091-8. doi: 10.1177/0363546511415660. Epub 2011 Jul 22.
7
Clinical outcomes and repair integrity after arthroscopic full-thickness rotator cuff repair: suture-bridge versus double-row modified Mason-Allen technique.关节镜下全层肩袖修复术后的临床疗效和修复完整性：缝合桥与双排改良 Mason-Allen 技术比较。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018 Nov;27(11):1953-1959. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.04.005. Epub 2018 May 24.
8
Repair integrity and functional outcome after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: double-row versus suture-bridge technique.关节镜下肩袖修复后修复完整性和功能结果：双排与缝线桥技术。
Am J Sports Med. 2012 Feb;40(2):294-9. doi: 10.1177/0363546511425657. Epub 2011 Nov 10.
9
Does double-row rotator cuff repair improve functional outcome of patients compared with single-row technique? A systematic review.双排肩袖修复与单排技术相比是否能改善患者的功能预后？系统评价。
Am J Sports Med. 2012 May;40(5):1176-85. doi: 10.1177/0363546511428866. Epub 2011 Dec 8.
10
Ultrasound evaluation of arthroscopic full-thickness supraspinatus rotator cuff repair: single-row versus double-row suture bridge (transosseous equivalent) fixation. Results of a prospective, randomized study.关节镜下全层冈上肌肩袖修补术的超声评估：单排与双排缝线桥（经骨等效）固定。一项前瞻性、随机研究的结果。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013 Nov;22(11):1480-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2013.06.020. Epub 2013 Sep 4.
引用本文的文献
1
A network meta-analysis of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.关节镜下肩袖修复的网状荟萃分析。
BMC Surg. 2023 Jul 13;23(1):201. doi: 10.1186/s12893-023-02078-4.
2
Position statement: management of rotator cuff tears in adults.立场声明：成人肩袖撕裂的处理。
Can J Surg. 2023 Apr 21;66(2):E190-E195. doi: 10.1503/cjs.022221. Print 2023 Mar-Apr.
3
A comparison of simple and complex single-row versus transosseous-equivalent double-row repair techniques for full-thickness rotator cuff tears: a systematic review and meta-analysis.全层肩袖撕裂的简单和复杂单排与经骨等效双排修复技术的比较：一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
JSES Int. 2021 Oct 26;6(1):70-78. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2021.09.007. eCollection 2022 Jan.
4
Comparative efficacy of 5 suture configurations for arthroscopic rotator cuff tear repair: a network meta-analysis.关节镜下肩袖撕裂修补术 5 种缝合方式的比较疗效：网状荟萃分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 Dec 11;16(1):714. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02847-y.
5
Reconstruction of large chronic rotator cuff tear can benefit from the bone-tendon composite autograft to restore the native bone-tendon interface.大型慢性肩袖撕裂的重建可受益于骨-肌腱复合自体移植物，以恢复天然的骨-肌腱界面。
J Orthop Translat. 2020 Jan 30;24:175-182. doi: 10.1016/j.jot.2020.01.001. eCollection 2020 Sep.
6
Acute Cuff Tear Repair Trial (ACCURATE): protocol for a multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled trial on the efficacy of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.急性肩袖撕裂修复试验（ACCURATE）：一项多中心、随机、安慰剂对照研究，评估关节镜下肩袖修复术的疗效。
BMJ Open. 2019 May 19;9(5):e025022. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025022.
7
The Clinical Effect of Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair techniques: A Network Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.关节镜肩袖修复技术的临床效果：网络荟萃分析和系统评价。
Sci Rep. 2019 Mar 11;9(1):4143. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-40641-3.
本文引用的文献
1
Ultrasound evaluation of arthroscopic full-thickness supraspinatus rotator cuff repair: single-row versus double-row suture bridge (transosseous equivalent) fixation. Results of a prospective, randomized study.关节镜下全层冈上肌肩袖修补术的超声评估：单排与双排缝线桥（经骨等效）固定。一项前瞻性、随机研究的结果。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013 Nov;22(11):1480-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2013.06.020. Epub 2013 Sep 4.
2
Arthroscopic single-row versus double-row rotator cuff repair: a meta-analysis of the randomized clinical trials.关节镜下单排与双排肩袖修复术的比较：随机临床试验的荟萃分析。
Arthroscopy. 2013 Feb;29(2):343-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2012.11.019.
3
Clinical outcomes of arthroscopic single and double row repair in full thickness rotator cuff tears.关节镜下单排和双排修复治疗全层肩袖撕裂的临床疗效
Indian J Orthop. 2010 Jul;44(3):308-13. doi: 10.4103/0019-5413.65160.
4
Outcomes of single-row and double-row arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a systematic review.单排和双排关节镜下肩袖修复的结果：系统评价。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 Mar;92(3):732-42. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.I.01295.
5
Does the literature support double-row suture anchor fixation for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair? A systematic review comparing double-row and single-row suture anchor configuration.文献支持关节镜下肩袖修复的双排缝线锚钉固定吗？比较双排和单排缝线锚钉固定方式的系统评价。
Arthroscopy. 2009 Nov;25(11):1319-28. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2009.02.005. Epub 2009 Aug 7.
6
Clinical outcomes of double-row versus single-row rotator cuff repairs.双排与单排肩袖修复的临床结果。
Arthroscopy. 2009 Nov;25(11):1312-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2009.08.009.
7
Single-row versus double-row arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a prospective randomized clinical study.单排与双排关节镜下肩袖修补术：一项前瞻性随机临床研究。
Arthroscopy. 2009 Jan;25(1):4-12. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2008.09.018. Epub 2008 Nov 1.
8
Biomechanical characteristics of single-row repair in comparison to double-row repair with consideration of the suture configuration and suture material.考虑缝线构型和缝线材料时，单排修复与双排修复的生物力学特性比较。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2008 Nov;16(11):1052-60. doi: 10.1007/s00167-008-0590-2. Epub 2008 Aug 29.
9
Single-row modified mason-allen versus double-row arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a biomechanical and surface area comparison.单排改良梅森-艾伦缝合法与双排关节镜下肩袖修补术的比较：生物力学及表面积对比
Arthroscopy. 2008 Aug;24(8):941-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2008.03.011. Epub 2008 May 19.
10
The outcome and structural integrity of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with use of the double-row suture anchor technique.使用双排缝线锚钉技术进行关节镜下肩袖修复的结果及结构完整性
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Jul;89(7):1533-41. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00305.
Zotero 插件