Brain Development Imaging Laboratory, Department of Psychology, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, USA.
Autism Res. 2017 Oct;10(10):1606-1620. doi: 10.1002/aur.1807. Epub 2017 May 15.
Common findings from diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) in autism spectrum disorder (ASD) include reduced fractional anisotropy (FA), and increased mean and radial diffusivity (MD, RD) of white matter tracts. However, findings may be confounded by head motion. We examined how group-level motion matching affects DTI comparisons between ASD and typically developing (TD) groups. We included 57 ASD and 50 TD participants, comparing three subsets at increasing levels of motion-matching stringency: full sample (FS); quality-controlled (QC); and quantitatively-matched (QM). Groups were compared on diffusivity measures using Tract-Based Spatial Statistics (TBSS) and probabilistic tractography. Two methods for estimating diffusivity were compared: dti-fit and restore. TBSS: In set FS, FA was reduced in the ASD compared to the TD group throughout the right hemisphere. This effect was less extensive in set QC and absent in set QM. However, effect sizes remained stable or increased with better quality-control in some regions. Tractography: In set QM, MD was significantly higher in ASD overall and RD was higher in bilateral ILF. Effects were more robust in QM than in FS or QC sets. Effect sizes in several tracts increased with stringent quality matching. Restore improved tensor estimates, with some increases in effect sizes, but did not fully compensate for reduced quality. Findings suggest that some previously reported DTI findings for ASD may have been confounded by motion. However, effects in the tightly matched subset indicate that tract-specific anomalies probably do exist in ASD. Our results highlight the need for careful quality-control and motion-matching. Autism Res 2017, 10: 1606-1620. © 2017 International Society for Autism Research, Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)的弥散张量成像(DTI)的常见发现包括各向异性分数(FA)降低,以及白质束的平均和径向弥散度(MD、RD)增加。然而,这些发现可能受到头部运动的影响。我们研究了组水平运动匹配如何影响 ASD 和典型发育(TD)组之间的 DTI 比较。我们纳入了 57 名 ASD 和 50 名 TD 参与者,比较了三个子集的运动匹配严格程度:全样本(FS);质量控制(QC);以及定量匹配(QM)。使用基于束的空间统计(TBSS)和概率性束追踪,比较三组的弥散度测量。比较了两种估计弥散度的方法:dti-fit 和 restore。TBSS:在 FS 组中,与 TD 组相比,ASD 的右侧半球的 FA 减少。在 QC 组中,这种影响的范围较小,而在 QM 组中则不存在。然而,在某些区域,随着质量控制的提高,效应大小保持稳定或增加。束追踪:在 QM 组中,ASD 的 MD 总体上显著升高,双侧内囊后肢束的 RD 升高。在 QM 组中,效应比 FS 或 QC 组更稳健。在几个束中,效应大小随着严格的质量匹配而增加。Restore 提高了张量估计,某些效应大小增加,但没有完全补偿质量降低的影响。研究结果表明,以前报道的 ASD 的一些 DTI 发现可能受到运动的影响。然而,在紧密匹配的子集中的效应表明,ASD 中可能确实存在特定束的异常。我们的研究结果强调了需要仔细的质量控制和运动匹配。自闭症研究 2017,10:1606-1620。©2017 自闭症国际研究协会,威利期刊,公司。