1 Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
2 Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Brain Connect. 2019 Mar;9(2):209-220. doi: 10.1089/brain.2018.0658.
Prior neuroimaging studies have reported white matter network underconnectivity as a potential mechanism for autism spectrum disorder (ASD). In this study, we examined the structural connectome of children with ASD using edge density imaging (EDI), and then applied machine-learning algorithms to identify children with ASD based on tract-based connectivity metrics. Boys aged 8-12 years were included: 14 with ASD and 33 typically developing children. The edge density (ED) maps were computed from probabilistic streamline tractography applied to high angular resolution diffusion imaging. Tract-based spatial statistics was used for voxel-wise comparison and coregistration of ED maps in addition to conventional diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) metrics of fractional anisotropy (FA), mean diffusivity (MD), and radial diffusivity (RD). Tract-based average DTI/connectome metrics were calculated and used as input for different machine-learning models: naïve Bayes, random forest, support vector machines (SVMs), and neural networks. For these models, cross-validation was performed with stratified random sampling ( × 1,000 permutations). The average accuracy among validation samples was calculated. In voxel-wise analysis, the body and splenium of corpus callosum, bilateral superior and posterior corona radiata, and left superior longitudinal fasciculus showed significantly lower ED in children with ASD; whereas, we could not find significant difference in FA, MD, and RD maps between the two study groups. Overall, machine-learning models using tract-based ED metrics had better performance in identification of children with ASD compared with those using FA, MD, and RD. The EDI-based random forest models had greater average accuracy (75.3%), specificity (97.0%), and positive predictive value (81.5%), whereas EDI-based polynomial SVM had greater sensitivity (51.4%) and negative predictive values (77.7%). In conclusion, we found reduced density of connectome edges in the posterior white matter tracts of children with ASD, and demonstrated the feasibility of connectome-based machine-learning algorithms in identification of children with ASD.
先前的神经影像学研究报告称,自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)患者的白质网络连接不足是其潜在机制。在这项研究中,我们使用边缘密度成像(EDI)检查了 ASD 儿童的结构连接组,并应用机器学习算法根据基于束流的连通性度量来识别 ASD 儿童。纳入年龄在 8-12 岁的男孩:14 名 ASD 儿童和 33 名典型发育儿童。从应用于高角度分辨率扩散成像的概率流线追踪中计算出边缘密度(ED)图。除了传统的各向异性分数(FA)、平均扩散度(MD)和径向扩散度(RD)的扩散张量成像(DTI)度量外,束流空间统计学还用于体素水平比较和 ED 图的配准。计算了基于束流的平均 DTI/连接组度量,并将其用作不同机器学习模型(朴素贝叶斯、随机森林、支持向量机(SVM)和神经网络)的输入。对于这些模型,采用分层随机抽样( × 1000 次排列)进行交叉验证。计算验证样本的平均准确率。在体素水平分析中,与对照组相比,ASD 儿童的胼胝体体部和压部、双侧额顶放射冠以及左侧上纵束的 ED 明显降低;然而,我们没有发现两组之间 FA、MD 和 RD 图的显著差异。总体而言,与 FA、MD 和 RD 相比,基于束流 ED 度量的机器学习模型在识别 ASD 儿童方面具有更好的性能。基于 EDI 的随机森林模型具有更高的平均准确率(75.3%)、特异性(97.0%)和阳性预测值(81.5%),而基于 EDI 的多项式 SVM 具有更高的灵敏度(51.4%)和阴性预测值(77.7%)。总之,我们发现 ASD 儿童的后白质束的连接组边缘密度降低,并证明了基于连接组的机器学习算法在识别 ASD 儿童方面的可行性。