Langford Rebecca, Bonell Christopher, Komro Kelli, Murphy Simon, Magnus Daniel, Waters Elizabeth, Gibbs Lisa, Campbell Rona
1 University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
2 University of London, London, UK.
Health Educ Behav. 2017 Jun;44(3):463-475. doi: 10.1177/1090198116673800. Epub 2016 Nov 14.
The World Health Organization's Health Promoting Schools (HPS) framework is a whole-school approach to promoting health that recognizes the intrinsic relationship between health and education. Our recent Cochrane systematic review found HPS interventions produced improvements in a number of student health outcomes. Here we reflect on what this review was not able to tell us: in other words, what evidence is missing with regard to the HPS approach. Few HPS interventions engage with schools' "core business" by examining impacts on educational outcomes. Current evidence is dominated by obesity interventions, with most studies conducted with children rather than adolescents. Evidence is lacking for outcomes such as mental or sexual health, substance use, and violence. Activities to engage families and communities are currently weak and unlikely to prompt behavioral change. The HPS approach is largely absent in low-income settings, despite its potential in meeting children's basic health needs. Intervention theories are insufficiently complex, often ignoring upstream determinants of health. Few studies provide evidence on intervention sustainability or cost-effectiveness, nor in-depth contextual or process data. We set out an agenda for future school health promotion research, considering implications for key stakeholders, namely, national governments, research funders, academics, and schools.
世界卫生组织的健康促进学校(HPS)框架是一种促进健康的全校性方法,它认识到健康与教育之间的内在关系。我们最近进行的Cochrane系统评价发现,HPS干预措施在一些学生健康结果方面产生了改善。在此,我们反思该评价未能告诉我们的内容:换句话说,关于HPS方法还缺少哪些证据。很少有HPS干预措施通过考察对教育成果的影响来涉及学校的“核心业务”。目前的证据主要是肥胖干预方面的,大多数研究是针对儿童而非青少年进行的。在心理健康或性健康、物质使用和暴力等结果方面缺乏证据。目前让家庭和社区参与的活动力度薄弱,不太可能促使行为改变。尽管HPS方法在满足儿童基本健康需求方面具有潜力,但在低收入环境中基本上不存在。干预理论不够复杂,往往忽视健康的上游决定因素。很少有研究提供关于干预可持续性或成本效益的证据,也没有深入的背景或过程数据。我们列出了未来学校健康促进研究的议程,考虑到对主要利益相关者的影响,即国家政府、研究资助者、学者和学校。