Chouake Robert J, Miles Brett A
aWestchester Medical Center, New York Medical College, Valhalla bIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, New York, USA.
Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 Aug;25(4):326-331. doi: 10.1097/MOO.0000000000000369.
The purpose of this manuscript is to review the current literature regarding the management of frontal sinus fractures and offer the authors opinion on the current management of these traumatic injuries. We evaluate recently proposed management algorithms as well as novel surgical approaches reported within the last few years.
Patient selection for sinus sparing treatment modalities is balanced between fracture severity, involved structures, and reliable patient surveillance. Minimally invasive, aesthetically favorable approaches grow in diversity for anterior table fractures. For fractures of the posterior sinus wall and nasofrontal outflow tract, the literature focuses on sinus sparing surgery, as well as better defining the patients in which obliteration and/or cranialization is appropriate.
Lack of large patient cohorts and follow-up limits generalizability of frontal sinus fracture research, and the ability to develop national guidelines of management. Evidence-based literature shows growing support for conservative management and sinus preservation. Improvements in frontal sinus fracture classification schemes, surgical technique, and patient selection direct this treatment paradigm shift.
本文的目的是回顾当前有关额窦骨折治疗的文献,并就这些创伤性损伤的当前治疗方法发表作者的观点。我们评估了最近提出的治疗算法以及过去几年报道的新型手术方法。
对于保留鼻窦的治疗方式,患者的选择要在骨折严重程度、受累结构和可靠的患者监测之间取得平衡。对于前壁骨折,微创且美观的手术方法日益多样化。对于后窦壁和鼻额管流出道骨折,文献主要关注保留鼻窦的手术,以及更好地确定适合进行填塞和/或颅骨化手术的患者。
缺乏大量患者队列和随访限制了额窦骨折研究的可推广性,以及制定全国性治疗指南的能力。循证文献显示,对保守治疗和保留鼻窦的支持日益增加。额窦骨折分类方案、手术技术和患者选择的改进推动了这种治疗模式的转变。