• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多身份追踪任务中基于语义类别的分组的脑激活情况

Brain activation of semantic category-based grouping in multiple identity tracking task.

作者信息

Wei Liuqing, Zhang Xuemin, Lyu Chuang, Hu Siyuan, Li Zhen

机构信息

School of Psychology, Beijing Key Lab of Applied Experimental Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.

State Key Lab of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning & IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2017 May 15;12(5):e0177709. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177709. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0177709
PMID:28505166
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5432174/
Abstract

Using Multiple Identity Tracking task and the functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) technology, the present study aimed to isolate and visualize the functional anatomy of neural systems involved in the semantic category-based grouping process. Three experiment conditions were selected and compared: the category-based targets grouping (TG) condition, the targets-distractors grouping (TDG) condition and the homogenous condition. In the TG condition, observers could utilize the categorical distinction between targets and distractors, to construct a uniform presentation of targets, that is, to form a group of the targets to facilitate tracking. In the TDG condition, half the targets and half the distractors belonged to the same category. Observers had to inhibit the grouping of targets and distractors in one category to complete tracking. In the homogenous condition, where targets and distractors consisted of the same objects, no grouping could be formed. The "TG-Homogenous" contrast (p<0.01) revealed the activation of the left fusiform and the pars triangularis of inferior frontal gyrus (IFG). The "TG-TDG" contrast only revealed the activation of the left anterior cingulate gyrus (ACC). The fusiform and IFG pars triangularis might participate in the representation of semantic knowledge, IFG pars triangularis might relate intensely with the classification of semantic categories. The ACC might be responsible for the initiation and maintenance of grouping representation.

摘要

本研究采用多重身份追踪任务和功能磁共振成像(fMRI)技术,旨在分离并可视化基于语义类别的分组过程中涉及的神经系统功能解剖结构。选取并比较了三种实验条件:基于类别的目标分组(TG)条件、目标-干扰项分组(TDG)条件和同质条件。在TG条件下,观察者可以利用目标与干扰项之间的类别差异,构建目标的统一呈现,即形成一组目标以方便追踪。在TDG条件下,一半的目标和一半的干扰项属于同一类别。观察者必须抑制同一类别中目标与干扰项的分组才能完成追踪。在同质条件下,目标和干扰项由相同的物体组成,无法形成分组。“TG-同质”对比(p<0.01)显示左侧梭状回和额下回三角部(IFG)激活。“TG-TDG”对比仅显示左侧前扣带回(ACC)激活。梭状回和IFG三角部可能参与语义知识的表征,IFG三角部可能与语义类别的分类密切相关。ACC可能负责分组表征的启动和维持。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bdfc/5432174/c3211ec4c954/pone.0177709.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bdfc/5432174/1f69c9bb2c13/pone.0177709.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bdfc/5432174/c3211ec4c954/pone.0177709.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bdfc/5432174/1f69c9bb2c13/pone.0177709.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bdfc/5432174/c3211ec4c954/pone.0177709.g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Brain activation of semantic category-based grouping in multiple identity tracking task.多身份追踪任务中基于语义类别的分组的脑激活情况
PLoS One. 2017 May 15;12(5):e0177709. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177709. eCollection 2017.
2
The Categorical Distinction Between Targets and Distractors Facilitates Tracking in Multiple Identity Tracking Task.目标与干扰项之间的类别区分有助于在多身份追踪任务中进行追踪。
Front Psychol. 2016 Apr 28;7:589. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00589. eCollection 2016.
3
The semantic category-based grouping in the Multiple Identity Tracking task.多重身份追踪任务中基于语义类别的分组。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2018 Jan;80(1):118-133. doi: 10.3758/s13414-017-1420-8.
4
Neural substrates of object identification: Functional magnetic resonance imaging evidence that category and visual attribute contribute to semantic knowledge.物体识别的神经基础:功能磁共振成像证据表明类别和视觉属性有助于语义知识。
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2009 Mar;15(2):169-81. doi: 10.1017/S1355617709090468.
5
Neural underpinnings for model-oriented therapy of aphasic word production.失语症词汇生成的面向模型治疗的神经基础。
Neuropsychologia. 2014 May;57:154-65. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.03.010. Epub 2014 Mar 28.
6
Brain Activation of Identity Switching in Multiple Identity Tracking Task.多重身份追踪任务中身份切换的大脑激活情况
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 23;10(12):e0145489. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145489. eCollection 2015.
7
A meta-analysis of fMRI studies on Chinese orthographic, phonological, and semantic processing.一项关于汉字正字法、语音和语义加工的 fMRI 研究的荟萃分析。
Neuroimage. 2012 Oct 15;63(1):381-91. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.06.047. Epub 2012 Jul 1.
8
The neural mechanisms of semantic and response conflicts: an fMRI study of practice-related effects in the Stroop task.语义和反应冲突的神经机制:一项关于Stroop任务中练习相关效应的功能磁共振成像研究。
Neuroimage. 2013 Feb 1;66:577-84. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.10.028. Epub 2012 Oct 24.
9
Combinatorial semantics strengthens angular-anterior temporal coupling.组合语义增强了角回与前颞叶的耦合。
Cortex. 2015 Apr;65:113-27. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2015.01.004. Epub 2015 Jan 24.
10
The role of the left anterior temporal lobe in the semantic processing of famous faces.左前颞叶在名人面孔语义加工中的作用。
Neuroimage. 2010 Nov 1;53(2):674-81. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.06.045. Epub 2010 Jun 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Visual experience modulates whole-brain connectivity dynamics: A resting-state fMRI study using the model of radiologists.视觉体验调节全脑连接动力学:使用放射科医生模型的静息态 fMRI 研究。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2021 Oct 1;42(14):4538-4554. doi: 10.1002/hbm.25563. Epub 2021 Jun 22.
2
Multiple-target tracking in human and machine vision.人类和机器视觉中的多目标跟踪。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2020 Apr 9;16(4):e1007698. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007698. eCollection 2020 Apr.
3
The Global Properties of Objects Play the Main Role in Facilitating Multiple Object Tracking Performance.

本文引用的文献

1
Additivity of Feature-Based and Symmetry-Based Grouping Effects in Multiple Object Tracking.多目标跟踪中基于特征和基于对称性分组效应的可加性
Front Psychol. 2016 May 4;7:657. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00657. eCollection 2016.
2
The Categorical Distinction Between Targets and Distractors Facilitates Tracking in Multiple Identity Tracking Task.目标与干扰项之间的类别区分有助于在多身份追踪任务中进行追踪。
Front Psychol. 2016 Apr 28;7:589. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00589. eCollection 2016.
3
Brain Activation of Identity Switching in Multiple Identity Tracking Task.
物体的全局属性在促进多物体跟踪性能方面起主要作用。
Front Psychol. 2019 Apr 26;10:924. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00924. eCollection 2019.
多重身份追踪任务中身份切换的大脑激活情况
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 23;10(12):e0145489. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145489. eCollection 2015.
4
Understanding What We See: How We Derive Meaning From Vision.理解我们所看到的:我们如何从视觉中获取意义。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2015 Nov;19(11):677-687. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2015.08.008.
5
Regional brain activity when selecting a response despite interference: An H2 (15) O PET study of the stroop and an emotional stroop.在存在干扰的情况下选择反应时的局部脑活动:Stroop 和情绪 Stroop 的 H2(15)O PET 研究。
Hum Brain Mapp. 1994;1(3):194-209. doi: 10.1002/hbm.460010305.
6
BrainNet Viewer: a network visualization tool for human brain connectomics.脑网络视图工具:用于人类脑连接组学的网络可视化工具。
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 4;8(7):e68910. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068910. Print 2013.
7
Eye movements in repeated multiple object tracking.重复多目标追踪中的眼动
J Vis. 2013 Jun 13;13(7):9. doi: 10.1167/13.7.9.
8
Automatic feature-based grouping during multiple object tracking.基于特征的自动分组在多目标跟踪中的应用。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2013 Dec;39(6):1625-1637. doi: 10.1037/a0031750. Epub 2013 Mar 4.
9
Swapping or dropping? Electrophysiological measures of difficulty during multiple object tracking.交换还是放弃?多项物体追踪过程中的困难的电生理测量。
Cognition. 2013 Feb;126(2):213-23. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.10.003. Epub 2012 Nov 7.
10
The effect of visual distinctiveness on multiple object tracking performance.视觉独特性对多目标跟踪性能的影响。
Front Psychol. 2012 Aug 27;3:307. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00307. eCollection 2012.