Spector A C, Breslin P, Grill H J
Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia 19104.
Behav Neurosci. 1988 Dec;102(6):942-52. doi: 10.1037//0735-7044.102.6.942.
Several explanations may account for deficits in the ability of animals to form taste aversions following neural manipulations. These encompass impairments in conditioned stimulus (CS) and unconditioned stimulus (US) processing, conditioned response (CR) measurement, and expression, memory, and taste-visceral integration. A behavioral procedure that aids in the distinction between some of these possibilities is presented. In Experiment 1, 10 rats received seven intraoral (IO) infusions of sucrose (30 s, 0.55 ml) spaced every 5 min starting immediately after the injection of 3.0 mEq/kg of lithium chloride (LiCl). Control rats (n = 12) were treated identically except that they were injected with sodium chloride (NaCl). Oromotor and somatic taste reactivity behaviors were videotaped and analyzed. Lithium-injected rats systematically decreased their ingestive taste reactivity behavior over time, whereas aversive behavior increased. Control rats maintained high and stable levels of ingestive responding and demonstrated virtually no aversive behavior over the 30-min period following sodium injection. Rats were tested several days later for the presence of a conditioned taste aversion (CTA). Rats previously injected with lithium during sucrose infusions demonstrated significantly more aversive behavior than the control group, which demonstrated none. There were no differences in the level of ingestive behavior displayed by the two groups on the CTA test. Experiment 3 revealed that when similarly treated rats were tested for a CTA while in a lithium-induced state, a difference in the ingestive behavior between the two groups was observed. In Experiment 2, naive rats were injected with either NaCl or LiCl but did not receive their first sucrose infusion until 20 min later. These rats also received sucrose infusions at 25 and 30 min postinjection. There were no differences in the taste reactivity behavior displayed by lithium- or sodium-injected rats during any of the sucrose infusions. Collectively, these findings indicate that rats dramatically change their oromotor responses to sucrose during the period following LiCl administration, provided that the infusions start immediately after injection. Furthermore, this time-related behavioral change is predominantly attributable to associative processes. This paradigm can be useful in distinguishing between neural manipulations that affect the establishment of taste-visceral associations from others that affect the animal's ability to retain such associations over the commonly employed 24-hr conditioning-test interval.
对于动物在神经操作后形成味觉厌恶能力的缺陷,可能有几种解释。这些解释包括条件刺激(CS)和非条件刺激(US)处理、条件反应(CR)测量、表达、记忆以及味觉-内脏整合方面的损伤。本文介绍了一种有助于区分其中一些可能性的行为程序。在实验1中,10只大鼠在注射3.0毫当量/千克氯化锂(LiCl)后立即开始,每隔5分钟接受7次口腔内(IO)蔗糖输注(30秒,0.55毫升)。对照大鼠(n = 12)的处理方式相同,只是注射的是氯化钠(NaCl)。对口腔运动和躯体味觉反应性行为进行录像并分析。注射锂的大鼠随着时间的推移系统地减少了它们的摄食性味觉反应行为,而厌恶行为增加。对照大鼠在注射钠后的30分钟内保持了较高且稳定的摄食反应水平,并且几乎没有表现出厌恶行为。几天后对大鼠进行条件性味觉厌恶(CTA)测试。之前在蔗糖输注期间注射锂的大鼠表现出的厌恶行为明显多于对照组,而对照组没有表现出厌恶行为。在CTA测试中,两组表现出的摄食行为水平没有差异。实验3表明,当对同样处理的大鼠在锂诱导状态下进行CTA测试时,观察到两组在摄食行为上存在差异。在实验2中,将未接触过实验的大鼠注射NaCl或LiCl,但直到注射后20分钟才进行第一次蔗糖输注。这些大鼠在注射后25分钟和30分钟也接受了蔗糖输注。在任何一次蔗糖输注期间,注射锂或钠的大鼠表现出的味觉反应行为没有差异。总体而言,这些发现表明,在给予LiCl后的一段时间内,如果输注在注射后立即开始,大鼠对蔗糖的口腔运动反应会发生显著变化。此外,这种与时间相关的行为变化主要归因于联想过程。这种范式可用于区分影响味觉-内脏关联建立的神经操作与影响动物在常用的24小时条件化-测试间隔内保留此类关联能力的其他神经操作。