Di Leo Milena, Maselli Roberta, Ferrara Elisa Chiara, Poliani Laura, Al Awadhi Sameer, Repici Alessandro
Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Via Manzoni, 56, Rozzano, 20089, Milan, Italy.
Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy.
Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol. 2017 Jun;15(2):268-284. doi: 10.1007/s11938-017-0138-y.
Esophageal leaks (EL) and ruptures (ER) are rare conditions associated with a high risk of mortality and morbidity. Historically, EL and ER have been surgically treated, but current treatment options also include conservative management and endoscopy. Over the last decades, interventional endoscopy has evolved as an effective and less invasive alternative to primary surgery in these cases. A variety of techniques are currently available to re-establish the continuity of the digestive tract, prevent or treat infection related to the leak/rupture, prevent further contamination, drain potential collections, and provide nutritional support. Endoscopic options include clips, both through the scope (TTS) and over the scope (OTS), stent placement, vacuum therapy, tissue adhesive, and endoscopic suturing techniques. Theoretically, all of these can be used alone or with a multimodality approach. Endoscopic therapy should be combined with medical therapy but also with percutaneous drainage of collections, where present. There is robust evidence suggesting that this change of therapeutic paradigm in the form of endoscopic therapy is associated with improved outcome, better quality of life, and shortened length of hospital stay. Moreover, recent European guidelines on endoscopic management of iatrogenic perforation have strengthened and to some degree regulated and redefined the role of endoscopy in the management of conditions where there is a breach in the continuity of the GI wall. Certainly, due to the complexity of these conditions and the variety of available treatment options, a multidisciplinary approach is strongly recommended, with close clinical monitoring (by endoscopists, surgeons, and intensive care physicians) and special attention to signs of sepsis, which can lead to the need for urgent surgical management. This review article will critically discuss the literature regarding endoscopic modalities for esophageal leak and perforation management and attempt to place them in perspective for the physician.
食管漏(EL)和破裂(ER)是罕见病症,具有高死亡率和高发病率风险。从历史上看,EL和ER一直通过手术治疗,但目前的治疗选择还包括保守治疗和内镜检查。在过去几十年中,介入性内镜检查已发展成为这些病例中替代初次手术的一种有效且侵入性较小的方法。目前有多种技术可用于重建消化道的连续性、预防或治疗与漏/破裂相关的感染、防止进一步污染、引流潜在积液以及提供营养支持。内镜治疗选择包括通过内镜(TTS)和内镜外(OTS)的夹子、支架置入、真空治疗、组织粘合剂以及内镜缝合技术。理论上,所有这些方法都可以单独使用或采用多模式方法。内镜治疗应与药物治疗相结合,但也应与存在积液时的经皮引流相结合。有充分证据表明,这种以内镜治疗形式出现的治疗模式转变与改善的治疗效果、更好的生活质量以及缩短的住院时间相关。此外,最近欧洲关于医源性穿孔内镜管理的指南加强了,并在一定程度上规范和重新定义了内镜在胃肠道壁连续性中断病症管理中的作用。当然,由于这些病症的复杂性和可用治疗选择的多样性,强烈建议采用多学科方法,进行密切的临床监测(由内镜医师、外科医生和重症监护医师进行),并特别关注败血症迹象,因为这可能导致需要紧急手术治疗。这篇综述文章将批判性地讨论有关食管漏和穿孔管理的内镜治疗方式的文献,并试图为医生提供相关视角。