Bode Maarten, Shankar Prasan
a The Department of Anthropology , University of Amsterdam , Amsterdam , Netherlands.
b Institute of Ayurveda and Integrative Medicine (IAIM), Geriatric Department , Transdisciplinary University , Bangalore , India.
Anthropol Med. 2018 Aug;25(2):162-175. doi: 10.1080/13648470.2017.1287258. Epub 2017 May 16.
The paper analyses the experiences with government sanctioned Ayurvedic college education of 14 young Ayurvedic doctors working at the Integrative Health Centre in Bangalore, India. Unfamiliarity with Ayurvedic logic and Indian natural philosophies, lack of clinical training and the mixing-up of Ayurvedic and biomedical notions are their main complaints. The 14 young Ayurvedic doctors also missed a convincing perspective on how to integrate Ayurvedic logic, modern scientific knowledge and biomedical diagnostics. Ayurvedic state sanctioned education seems to be caught between Ayurveda's natural philosophy of health and the techno-science of biomedicine. The Ayurvedic doctors under scrutiny face the danger of becoming 'half-baked products' when they do not learn to reflect on the tension between Indian traditional knowledge and biomedical learning. The paper argues that the logic of modern science and biomedicine's claim to value-free knowledge captivates Ayurvedic education and research. This hinders Ayurveda's development as a vibrant alterity to biomedicine. What is needed is a critical social science perspective on the construction of medical knowledge and India's hierarchical medical landscape.
本文分析了在印度班加罗尔综合健康中心工作的14位年轻阿育吠陀医生接受政府认可的阿育吠陀学院教育的经历。他们主要抱怨的是对阿育吠陀逻辑和印度自然哲学不熟悉、缺乏临床培训以及阿育吠陀观念与生物医学观念的混淆。这14位年轻的阿育吠陀医生也缺少关于如何整合阿育吠陀逻辑、现代科学知识和生物医学诊断的令人信服的观点。政府认可的阿育吠陀教育似乎陷入了阿育吠陀的自然健康哲学与生物医学的技术科学之间。接受审查的阿育吠陀医生如果不学会反思印度传统知识与生物医学学习之间的紧张关系,就面临成为“半成品”的危险。本文认为,现代科学的逻辑以及生物医学对无价值取向知识的主张束缚了阿育吠陀教育和研究。这阻碍了阿育吠陀作为生物医学充满活力的另类医学的发展。我们需要一种批判性的社会科学视角来审视医学知识的构建以及印度等级分明的医学格局。