Suppr超能文献

国际移民与非移民在欧洲使用急诊部门的比较:系统评价。

International migrants' use of emergency departments in Europe compared with non-migrants' use: a systematic review.

机构信息

School of Health and Related Research, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.

出版信息

Eur J Public Health. 2018 Feb 1;28(1):61-73. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckx057.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

International migration across Europe is increasing. High rates of net migration may be expected to increase pressure on healthcare services, including emergency services. However, the extent to which immigration creates additional pressure on emergency departments (EDs) is widely debated. This review synthesizes the evidence relating to international migrants' use of EDs in European Economic Area (EEA) countries as compared with that of non-migrants.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, The Cochrane Library and The Web of Science were searched for the years 2000-16. Studies reporting on ED service utilization by international immigrants, as compared with non-migrants, were eligible for inclusion. Included studies were restricted to those conducted in EEA countries and English language publications only.

RESULTS

Twenty-two articles (from six host countries) were included. Thirteen of 18 articles reported higher volume of ED service use by immigrants, or some immigrant sub-groups. Migrants were seen to be significantly more likely to present to the ED during unsocial hours and more likely than non-migrants to use the ED for low-acuity presentations. Differences in presenting conditions were seen in 4/7 articles; notably a higher rate of obstetric and gynaecology presentations among migrant women.

CONCLUSIONS

The principal finding of this review is that migrants utilize the ED more, and differently, to the native populations in EEA countries. The higher use of the ED for low-acuity presentations and the use of the ED during unsocial hours suggest that barriers to primary healthcare may be driving the higher use of these emergency services although further research is needed.

摘要

背景

欧洲的国际移民数量不断增加。预计净移民率高将增加对医疗保健服务的压力,包括急诊服务。然而,移民对急诊部门(ED)造成的额外压力程度存在广泛争议。本综述综合了有关欧洲经济区(EEA)国家国际移民与非移民在急诊部门使用情况的证据。

方法

2000 年至 2016 年,我们在 MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL、Cochrane 图书馆和 Web of Science 中进行了搜索。符合条件的研究报告了国际移民与非移民相比在急诊部门的服务利用情况。纳入的研究仅限于在 EEA 国家进行的且仅为英文出版物的研究。

结果

共纳入 22 篇文章(来自 6 个东道国)。18 篇文章中的 13 篇报告称移民或某些移民亚组的急诊部门服务使用量较高。移民在非社交时间更有可能到急诊就诊,并且比非移民更有可能因低危就诊而使用急诊部门。7 篇文章中的 4 篇文章中观察到就诊条件的差异;特别是移民妇女中产科和妇科就诊的比例较高。

结论

本综述的主要发现是,在 EEA 国家,移民比本地居民更频繁地、不同地使用急诊部门。急诊部门用于低危就诊的比例较高,以及非社交时间使用急诊部门就诊的情况表明,初级保健的障碍可能是导致这些急诊服务利用率较高的原因,但还需要进一步研究。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

6
Migration and health in an increasingly diverse Europe.日益多元化的欧洲中的移民与健康。
Lancet. 2013 Apr 6;381(9873):1235-45. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)62086-8. Epub 2013 Mar 27.
8
Health care utilization by immigrants in Italy.意大利移民的医疗保健利用情况。
Int J Health Care Finance Econ. 2013 Mar;13(1):1-31. doi: 10.1007/s10754-012-9119-9. Epub 2012 Dec 13.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验