Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Department of Epidemiology, Lazio Regional Health Service, Rome, Italy.
BMC Public Health. 2020 Oct 15;20(1):1548. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09280-6.
The Emergency Department (ED) can be considered an indicator of accessibility and quality and can be influenced in period of economic downturns. In the last fifteen years, the number of migrants in Italy has doubled (from 2.4 million in 2005 to 5.2 in 2019, 4.1 and 8.7% of the total population, respectively). However, evidence about migrants' healthcare use is poor, and no studies focused on the ED utilisation rate during the Great Recession are available. This study aims to analyse trends in all-cause and cause-specific ED utilisation among migrants and Italians residing in Rome, Italy, before and after 2008.
Longitudinal study based on data from the Municipal Register of Rome linked to the Emergency Department Register from 2005 to 2015. We analysed 2,184,467 individuals, aged 25-64 in each year. We applied a Hurdle model to estimate the propensity to use the ED and to model how often individuals accessed the ED.
Migrants were less likely to be ED users than Italians, except for Africans (RR = 1.46, 95%CI 1.40-1.52) and Latin Americans (RR = 1.04, 95%CI 1.00-1.08) who had higher all-cause utilisation rates than non-migrants. Compared to the pre-2008 period, in the post-2008 we found an increase in the likelihood of being an ED user (OR = 1.34, 95%CI 1.34-1.35), and a decrease in ED utilisation rates (RR = 0.96, 95%CI 0.96-0.97) for the whole population, with differences among migrant subgroups, regardless of cause.
This study shows differences in the ED utilisation between migrants and Italians, and within the migrant population, during the Great Recession. The findings may reflect differentials in the health status, and barriers to access primary and secondary care among migrants. In this regard, health policies and cuts in health spending measures may have played a key role, and interventions to tackle health and access disparities should include policy measures addressing the underlying factors, adopting a Health in All Policies perspective. Further researches focusing on specific groups of migrants, and on the causes and diagnoses related to the ED utilisation, may help to explain the differences observed.
急诊科(ED)可被视为可及性和质量的指标,并可能受到经济衰退时期的影响。在过去的十五年中,意大利的移民人数翻了一番(从 2005 年的 240 万增加到 2019 年的 520 万,分别占总人口的 4.1%和 8.7%)。然而,有关移民医疗保健使用情况的证据很少,并且没有研究关注大衰退期间急诊科的利用率。本研究旨在分析意大利罗马移民和意大利人在 2008 年前后所有原因和特定原因急诊科利用率的趋势。
这是一项基于 2005 年至 2015 年罗马市登记处与急诊科登记处之间数据的纵向研究。我们分析了 2184467 名年龄在 25-64 岁的个体。我们应用障碍模型来估计使用 ED 的倾向,并对个体使用 ED 的频率进行建模。
与意大利人相比,移民使用急诊科的可能性较低,但非洲人(RR=1.46,95%CI 1.40-1.52)和拉丁美洲人(RR=1.04,95%CI 1.00-1.08)除外,他们的所有原因利用率均高于非移民。与 2008 年之前相比,我们发现 2008 年之后成为急诊科使用者的可能性增加(OR=1.34,95%CI 1.34-1.35),而整个人群的急诊科利用率下降(RR=0.96,95%CI 0.96-0.97),移民亚组之间存在差异,无论原因如何。
本研究表明,在大衰退期间,移民和意大利人之间以及移民人群内部的急诊科利用率存在差异。研究结果可能反映了移民健康状况的差异,以及初级和二级保健机会方面的障碍。在这方面,卫生政策和卫生支出削减措施可能发挥了关键作用,解决卫生和获得方面差异的干预措施应包括针对潜在因素的政策措施,采取全健康政策视角。进一步关注特定移民群体以及与急诊科利用相关的原因和诊断的研究可能有助于解释观察到的差异。