• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

神经动力学组织是团队合作的基本属性吗?

Are Neurodynamic Organizations A Fundamental Property of Teamwork?

作者信息

Stevens Ronald H, Galloway Trysha L

机构信息

Brain Research Institute, UCLA School of MedicineCulver City, CA., USA.

The Learning Chameleon, Inc.Culver City, CA, USA.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2017 May 2;8:644. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00644. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00644
PMID:28512438
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5411457/
Abstract

When performing a task it is important for teams to optimize their strategies and actions to maximize value and avoid the cost of surprise. The decisions teams make sometimes have unintended consequences and they must then reorganize their thinking, roles and/or configuration into corrective structures more appropriate for the situation. In this study we ask: What are the neurodynamic properties of these reorganizations and how do they relate to the moment-by-moment, and longer, performance-outcomes of teams?. We describe an information-organization approach for detecting and quantitating the fluctuating neurodynamic organizations in teams. Neurodynamic organization is the propensity of team members to enter into prolonged (minutes) metastable neurodynamic relationships as they encounter and resolve disturbances to their normal rhythms. Team neurodynamic organizations were detected and modeled by transforming the physical units of each team member's EEG power levels into Shannon entropy-derived information units about the team's organization and synchronization. Entropy is a measure of the variability or uncertainty of information in a data stream. This physical unit to information unit transformation bridges micro level social coordination events with macro level expert observations of team behavior allowing multimodal comparisons across the neural, cognitive and behavioral time scales of teamwork. The measures included the entropy of each team member's data stream, the overall team entropy and the mutual information between dyad pairs of the team. Mutual information can be thought of as periods related to team member synchrony. Comparisons between individual entropy and mutual information levels for the dyad combinations of three-person teams provided quantitative estimates of the proportion of a person's neurodynamic organizations that represented periods of synchrony with other team members, which in aggregate provided measures of the overall degree of neurodynamic interactions of the team. We propose that increased neurodynamic organization occurs when a team's operating rhythm can no longer support the complexity of the task and the team needs to expend energy to re-organize into structures that better minimize the "surprise" in the environment. Consistent with this hypothesis, the frequency and magnitude of neurodynamic organizations were less in experienced military and healthcare teams than they were in more junior teams. Similar dynamical properties of neurodynamic organization were observed in models of the EEG data streams of military, healthcare and high school science teams suggesting that neurodynamic organization may be a common property of teamwork. The innovation of this study is the potential it raises for developing globally applicable quantitative models of team dynamics that will allow comparisons to be made across teams, tasks and training protocols.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8c2/5411457/5eedcece94ef/fpsyg-08-00644-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8c2/5411457/5eedcece94ef/fpsyg-08-00644-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8c2/5411457/5eedcece94ef/fpsyg-08-00644-g0001.jpg
摘要

在执行任务时,团队优化其策略和行动以实现价值最大化并避免意外成本非常重要。团队做出的决策有时会产生意想不到的后果,然后他们必须将自己的思维、角色和/或配置重新组织成更适合该情况的纠正性结构。在本研究中,我们提出问题:这些重组的神经动力学特性是什么,它们与团队的即时和长期绩效结果有何关系?我们描述了一种信息组织方法,用于检测和量化团队中波动的神经动力学组织。神经动力学组织是团队成员在遇到并解决其正常节奏的干扰时,进入长时间(数分钟)亚稳态神经动力学关系的倾向。通过将每个团队成员脑电图功率水平的物理单位转换为关于团队组织和同步性的香农熵衍生信息单位,来检测和建模团队神经动力学组织。熵是数据流中信息变异性或不确定性的度量。这种从物理单位到信息单位的转换将微观层面的社会协调事件与宏观层面的团队行为专家观察联系起来,允许在团队合作的神经、认知和行为时间尺度上进行多模态比较。测量包括每个团队成员数据流的熵、团队整体熵以及团队二元组之间的互信息。互信息可以被认为是与团队成员同步相关的时期。对三人团队二元组合的个体熵和互信息水平进行比较,提供了一个人神经动力学组织中与其他团队成员同步时期所占比例的定量估计,总体上提供了团队神经动力学相互作用总体程度的度量。我们提出,当团队的运作节奏不再能够支持任务的复杂性,并且团队需要耗费精力重新组织成能更好地最小化环境中“意外”的结构时,神经动力学组织会增加。与该假设一致,经验丰富的军事和医疗团队中神经动力学组织的频率和幅度低于较初级的团队。在军事、医疗和高中科学团队的脑电图数据流模型中观察到类似的神经动力学组织动态特性,这表明神经动力学组织可能是团队合作的一个共同特性。本研究的创新之处在于它为开发全球适用的团队动态定量模型带来了潜力,这些模型将允许在不同团队、任务和训练协议之间进行比较。

相似文献

1
Are Neurodynamic Organizations A Fundamental Property of Teamwork?神经动力学组织是团队合作的基本属性吗?
Front Psychol. 2017 May 2;8:644. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00644. eCollection 2017.
2
Modeling the neurodynamic organizations and interactions of teams.模拟团队的神经动力学组织与互动。
Soc Neurosci. 2016;11(2):123-39. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2015.1056883. Epub 2015 Jun 16.
3
Neuroergonomics: Quantitative Modeling of Individual, Shared, and Team Neurodynamic Information.神经工效学:个体、共享和团队神经动力学信息的定量建模。
Hum Factors. 2018 Nov;60(7):1022-1034. doi: 10.1177/0018720818781623. Epub 2018 Jun 15.
4
Tracing Neurodynamic Information Flows during Teamwork.追踪团队合作过程中的神经动力学信息流。
Nonlinear Dynamics Psychol Life Sci. 2016 Apr;20(2):271-92.
5
Parsing Neurodynamic Information Streams to Estimate the Frequency, Magnitude and Duration of Team Uncertainty.解析神经动力学信息流以估计团队不确定性的频率、幅度和持续时间。
Front Syst Neurosci. 2021 Feb 1;15:606823. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2021.606823. eCollection 2021.
6
Toward a quantitative description of the neurodynamic organizations of teams.朝向团队神经动力学组织的定量描述。
Soc Neurosci. 2014;9(2):160-73. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2014.883324.
7
The organizational neurodynamics of teams.团队的组织神经动力学
Nonlinear Dynamics Psychol Life Sci. 2013 Jan;17(1):67-86.
8
Advancing Our Understandings of Healthcare Team Dynamics From the Simulation Room to the Operating Room: A Neurodynamic Perspective.从模拟室到手术室深化我们对医疗团队动态的理解:神经动力学视角
Front Psychol. 2019 Aug 12;10:1660. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01660. eCollection 2019.
9
Exploring how healthcare teams balance the neurodynamics of autonomous and collaborative behaviors: a proof of concept.探索医疗团队如何平衡自主行为与协作行为的神经动力学:概念验证
Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 Jul 28;16:932468. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.932468. eCollection 2022.
10
Using Communication to Modulate Neural Synchronization in Teams.利用沟通调节团队中的神经同步
Front Hum Neurosci. 2020 Sep 8;14:332. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00332. eCollection 2020.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing Team Situational Awareness in the Operating Room via Computer Vision.通过计算机视觉评估手术室中的团队态势感知。
IEEE Conf Cogn Comput Asp Situat Manag. 2022 Jun;2022:94-96. doi: 10.1109/cogsima54611.2022.9830664. Epub 2022 Jul 22.
2
Exploring how healthcare teams balance the neurodynamics of autonomous and collaborative behaviors: a proof of concept.探索医疗团队如何平衡自主行为与协作行为的神经动力学:概念验证
Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 Jul 28;16:932468. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.932468. eCollection 2022.
3
Parsing Neurodynamic Information Streams to Estimate the Frequency, Magnitude and Duration of Team Uncertainty.

本文引用的文献

1
Tracing Neurodynamic Information Flows during Teamwork.追踪团队合作过程中的神经动力学信息流。
Nonlinear Dynamics Psychol Life Sci. 2016 Apr;20(2):271-92.
2
The coordination dynamics of social neuromarkers.社会神经标记物的协调动力学
Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Oct 20;9:563. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00563. eCollection 2015.
3
Cross-Level Effects Between Neurophysiology and Communication During Team Training.团队训练期间神经生理学与沟通之间的跨层次效应。
解析神经动力学信息流以估计团队不确定性的频率、幅度和持续时间。
Front Syst Neurosci. 2021 Feb 1;15:606823. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2021.606823. eCollection 2021.
4
Using Communication to Modulate Neural Synchronization in Teams.利用沟通调节团队中的神经同步
Front Hum Neurosci. 2020 Sep 8;14:332. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00332. eCollection 2020.
5
What binds us? Inter-brain neural synchronization and its implications for theories of human consciousness.是什么将我们联系在一起?脑间神经同步及其对人类意识理论的影响。
Neurosci Conscious. 2020 Jun 11;2020(1):niaa010. doi: 10.1093/nc/niaa010. eCollection 2020.
6
Tilting Together: An Information-Theoretic Characterization of Behavioral Roles in Rhythmic Dyadic Interaction.共同倾斜:节奏性二元互动中行为角色的信息论表征
Front Hum Neurosci. 2020 May 25;14:185. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00185. eCollection 2020.
7
Advancing Our Understandings of Healthcare Team Dynamics From the Simulation Room to the Operating Room: A Neurodynamic Perspective.从模拟室到手术室深化我们对医疗团队动态的理解:神经动力学视角
Front Psychol. 2019 Aug 12;10:1660. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01660. eCollection 2019.
8
Physiological synchronization and entropy as measures of team cognitive load.生理同步和熵作为团队认知负荷的度量指标。
J Biomed Inform. 2019 Aug;96:103250. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103250. Epub 2019 Jul 8.
9
Understanding and Modeling Teams As Dynamical Systems.将团队理解为动态系统并进行建模。
Front Psychol. 2017 Jul 11;8:1053. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01053. eCollection 2017.
Hum Factors. 2016 Feb;58(1):181-99. doi: 10.1177/0018720815602575. Epub 2015 Sep 21.
4
Brain activity and cognition: a connection from thermodynamics and information theory.大脑活动与认知:热力学与信息论的联系
Front Psychol. 2015 Jun 16;6:818. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00818. eCollection 2015.
5
Modeling the neurodynamic organizations and interactions of teams.模拟团队的神经动力学组织与互动。
Soc Neurosci. 2016;11(2):123-39. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2015.1056883. Epub 2015 Jun 16.
6
Gamma activity coupled to alpha phase as a mechanism for top-down controlled gating.与α相位耦合的γ活动作为自上而下控制门控的一种机制。
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 3;10(6):e0128667. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0128667. eCollection 2015.
7
Vacillation, indecision and hesitation in moment-by-moment decoding of monkey motor cortex.猕猴运动皮层逐时刻解码中的摇摆、犹豫不决和迟疑
Elife. 2015 May 5;4:e04677. doi: 10.7554/eLife.04677.
8
Neural signatures of team coordination are revealed by multifractal analysis.多标度分析揭示了团队协调的神经特征。
Soc Neurosci. 2014;9(3):219-34. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2014.882861. Epub 2014 Feb 12.
9
Toward a quantitative description of the neurodynamic organizations of teams.朝向团队神经动力学组织的定量描述。
Soc Neurosci. 2014;9(2):160-73. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2014.883324.
10
Working memory and neural oscillations: α-γ versus θ-γ codes for distinct WM information?工作记忆与神经振荡:α-γ 与 θ-γ 编码用于区分 WM 信息?
Trends Cogn Sci. 2014 Jan;18(1):16-25. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2013.10.010. Epub 2013 Nov 19.