• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

朝向团队神经动力学组织的定量描述。

Toward a quantitative description of the neurodynamic organizations of teams.

机构信息

a School of Medicine, UCLA , Los Angeles , USA.

出版信息

Soc Neurosci. 2014;9(2):160-73. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2014.883324.

DOI:10.1080/17470919.2014.883324
PMID:24502273
Abstract

The goal was to develop quantitative models of the neurodynamic organizations of teams that could be used for comparing performance within and across teams and sessions. A symbolic modeling system was developed, where raw electroencephalography (EEG) signals from dyads were first transformed into second-by-second estimates of the cognitive Workload or Engagement of each person and transformed again into symbols representing the aggregated levels of the team. The resulting neurodynamic symbol streams had a persistent structure and contained segments of differential symbol expression. The quantitative Shannon entropy changes during these periods were related to speech, performance, and team responses to task changes. The dyads in an unscripted map navigation task (Human Communication Research Centre (HCRC) Map Task (MT)) developed fluctuating dynamics for Workload and Engagement, as they established their teamwork rhythms, and these were disrupted by external changes to the task. The entropy fluctuations during these disruptions differed in frequency, magnitude, and duration, and were associated with qualitative and quantitative changes in team organization and performance. These results indicate that neurodynamic models may be reliable, sensitive, and valid indicators of the changing neurodynamics of teams around which standardized quantitative models can begin to be developed.

摘要

目的是开发团队神经动力学组织的定量模型,可用于比较团队内和团队间以及各轮次的表现。为此开发了一个符号建模系统,该系统将来自二人组的原始脑电图 (EEG) 信号首先转换为每个人的认知工作量或投入的逐秒估计值,然后再次转换为代表团队综合水平的符号。由此产生的神经动力学符号流具有持久的结构,并且包含差分符号表达的片段。这些期间的定量香农熵变化与言语、表现以及团队对任务变化的反应有关。在非脚本地图导航任务(人类通信研究中心 (HCRC) 地图任务 (MT))中,二人组在建立团队协作节奏时,其工作量和投入呈现波动动态,而这些动态会因任务的外部变化而受到干扰。这些干扰期间的熵波动在频率、幅度和持续时间上有所不同,与团队组织和表现的定性和定量变化有关。这些结果表明,神经动力学模型可能是团队神经动力学变化的可靠、敏感和有效指标,围绕这些指标可以开始开发标准化的定量模型。

相似文献

1
Toward a quantitative description of the neurodynamic organizations of teams.朝向团队神经动力学组织的定量描述。
Soc Neurosci. 2014;9(2):160-73. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2014.883324.
2
Modeling the neurodynamic organizations and interactions of teams.模拟团队的神经动力学组织与互动。
Soc Neurosci. 2016;11(2):123-39. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2015.1056883. Epub 2015 Jun 16.
3
The organizational neurodynamics of teams.团队的组织神经动力学
Nonlinear Dynamics Psychol Life Sci. 2013 Jan;17(1):67-86.
4
Tracing Neurodynamic Information Flows during Teamwork.追踪团队合作过程中的神经动力学信息流。
Nonlinear Dynamics Psychol Life Sci. 2016 Apr;20(2):271-92.
5
Neuroergonomics: Quantitative Modeling of Individual, Shared, and Team Neurodynamic Information.神经工效学:个体、共享和团队神经动力学信息的定量建模。
Hum Factors. 2018 Nov;60(7):1022-1034. doi: 10.1177/0018720818781623. Epub 2018 Jun 15.
6
Are Neurodynamic Organizations A Fundamental Property of Teamwork?神经动力学组织是团队合作的基本属性吗?
Front Psychol. 2017 May 2;8:644. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00644. eCollection 2017.
7
Cognitive neurophysiologic synchronies: what can they contribute to the study of teamwork?认知神经生理同步:它们能为团队合作研究带来什么?
Hum Factors. 2012 Aug;54(4):489-502. doi: 10.1177/0018720811427296.
8
Parsing Neurodynamic Information Streams to Estimate the Frequency, Magnitude and Duration of Team Uncertainty.解析神经动力学信息流以估计团队不确定性的频率、幅度和持续时间。
Front Syst Neurosci. 2021 Feb 1;15:606823. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2021.606823. eCollection 2021.
9
Neural signatures of team coordination are revealed by multifractal analysis.多标度分析揭示了团队协调的神经特征。
Soc Neurosci. 2014;9(3):219-34. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2014.882861. Epub 2014 Feb 12.
10
Advancing Our Understandings of Healthcare Team Dynamics From the Simulation Room to the Operating Room: A Neurodynamic Perspective.从模拟室到手术室深化我们对医疗团队动态的理解:神经动力学视角
Front Psychol. 2019 Aug 12;10:1660. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01660. eCollection 2019.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing Team Situational Awareness in the Operating Room via Computer Vision.通过计算机视觉评估手术室中的团队态势感知。
IEEE Conf Cogn Comput Asp Situat Manag. 2022 Jun;2022:94-96. doi: 10.1109/cogsima54611.2022.9830664. Epub 2022 Jul 22.
2
Exploring how healthcare teams balance the neurodynamics of autonomous and collaborative behaviors: a proof of concept.探索医疗团队如何平衡自主行为与协作行为的神经动力学:概念验证
Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 Jul 28;16:932468. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.932468. eCollection 2022.
3
multiSyncPy: A Python package for assessing multivariate coordination dynamics.
多变量同步分析 Python 包(multiSyncPy):用于评估多变量协调动力学。
Behav Res Methods. 2023 Feb;55(2):932-962. doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-01855-y.
4
Parsing Neurodynamic Information Streams to Estimate the Frequency, Magnitude and Duration of Team Uncertainty.解析神经动力学信息流以估计团队不确定性的频率、幅度和持续时间。
Front Syst Neurosci. 2021 Feb 1;15:606823. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2021.606823. eCollection 2021.
5
Using Communication to Modulate Neural Synchronization in Teams.利用沟通调节团队中的神经同步
Front Hum Neurosci. 2020 Sep 8;14:332. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00332. eCollection 2020.
6
Advancing Our Understandings of Healthcare Team Dynamics From the Simulation Room to the Operating Room: A Neurodynamic Perspective.从模拟室到手术室深化我们对医疗团队动态的理解:神经动力学视角
Front Psychol. 2019 Aug 12;10:1660. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01660. eCollection 2019.
7
Understanding and Modeling Teams As Dynamical Systems.将团队理解为动态系统并进行建模。
Front Psychol. 2017 Jul 11;8:1053. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01053. eCollection 2017.
8
Are Neurodynamic Organizations A Fundamental Property of Teamwork?神经动力学组织是团队合作的基本属性吗?
Front Psychol. 2017 May 2;8:644. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00644. eCollection 2017.