• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探索医疗团队如何平衡自主行为与协作行为的神经动力学:概念验证

Exploring how healthcare teams balance the neurodynamics of autonomous and collaborative behaviors: a proof of concept.

作者信息

Stevens Ronald, Galloway Trysha L

机构信息

UCLA School of Medicine, Brain Research Institute, Los Angeles, CA, United States.

The Learning Chameleon, Inc., Culver City, CA, United States.

出版信息

Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 Jul 28;16:932468. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.932468. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fnhum.2022.932468
PMID:35966993
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9365959/
Abstract

Team members co-regulate their activities and move together at the collective level of behavior while coordinating their actions toward shared goals. In parallel with team processes, team members need to resolve uncertainties arising from the changing task and environment. In this exploratory study we have measured the differential neurodynamics of seven two-person healthcare teams across time and brain regions during autonomous (taskwork) and collaborative (teamwork) segments of simulation training. The questions posed were: (1) whether these abstract and mostly integrated constructs could be separated neurodynamically; and, (2) what could be learned about taskwork and teamwork by trying to do so? The taskwork and teamwork frameworks used were Neurodynamic Information (), an electroencephalography (EEG) derived measure shown to be a neurodynamic proxy for the pauses and hesitations associated with individual uncertainty, and inter-brain EEG coherence () which is a required component of social interactions. No interdependency was observed between NI and IBC, and second-by-second dynamic comparisons suggested mutual exclusivity. These studies show that proxies for fundamental properties of teamwork and taskwork can be separated neurodynamically during team performances of ecologically valid tasks. The persistent expression of and were not simultaneous suggesting that it may be difficult for team members to maintain inter-brain coherence while simultaneously reducing their individual uncertainties. Lastly, these separate dynamics occur over time frames of 15-30 s providing time for real-time detection and mitigation of individual and collaborative complications during training or live patient encounters.

摘要

团队成员在行为的集体层面上共同调节他们的活动,并朝着共同目标协调行动时一起行动。与团队过程并行的是,团队成员需要解决因任务和环境变化而产生的不确定性。在这项探索性研究中,我们测量了七个两人医疗团队在模拟训练的自主(任务工作)和协作(团队工作)阶段,跨时间和脑区的差异神经动力学。提出的问题是:(1)这些抽象且大多相互整合的结构在神经动力学上是否可以分离;以及,(2)通过尝试这样做,关于任务工作和团队工作可以了解到什么?所使用的任务工作和团队工作框架是神经动力学信息(),这是一种从脑电图(EEG)得出的测量方法,已被证明是与个体不确定性相关的停顿和犹豫的神经动力学代理指标,以及脑间EEG相干性(),它是社会互动的一个必要组成部分。在NI和IBC之间未观察到相互依赖性,逐秒动态比较表明相互排斥。这些研究表明,在生态有效任务的团队表现过程中,团队工作和任务工作基本属性的代理指标在神经动力学上可以分离。和的持续表达并非同时发生,这表明团队成员可能难以在降低个体不确定性的同时保持脑间相干性。最后,这些不同的动态发生在15 - 30秒的时间范围内,为在训练或实际患者接触期间实时检测和缓解个体及协作并发症提供了时间。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44ce/9365959/ce04cadc2df3/fnhum-16-932468-g0009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44ce/9365959/10cc41902b42/fnhum-16-932468-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44ce/9365959/aa7a26ab79e7/fnhum-16-932468-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44ce/9365959/291458b44cab/fnhum-16-932468-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44ce/9365959/ab35b5a679af/fnhum-16-932468-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44ce/9365959/bc4e91f62400/fnhum-16-932468-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44ce/9365959/e2b24c7cac89/fnhum-16-932468-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44ce/9365959/bb06d83b172b/fnhum-16-932468-g0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44ce/9365959/ed11471ea45c/fnhum-16-932468-g0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44ce/9365959/ce04cadc2df3/fnhum-16-932468-g0009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44ce/9365959/10cc41902b42/fnhum-16-932468-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44ce/9365959/aa7a26ab79e7/fnhum-16-932468-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44ce/9365959/291458b44cab/fnhum-16-932468-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44ce/9365959/ab35b5a679af/fnhum-16-932468-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44ce/9365959/bc4e91f62400/fnhum-16-932468-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44ce/9365959/e2b24c7cac89/fnhum-16-932468-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44ce/9365959/bb06d83b172b/fnhum-16-932468-g0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44ce/9365959/ed11471ea45c/fnhum-16-932468-g0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44ce/9365959/ce04cadc2df3/fnhum-16-932468-g0009.jpg

相似文献

1
Exploring how healthcare teams balance the neurodynamics of autonomous and collaborative behaviors: a proof of concept.探索医疗团队如何平衡自主行为与协作行为的神经动力学:概念验证
Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 Jul 28;16:932468. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.932468. eCollection 2022.
2
Are Neurodynamic Organizations A Fundamental Property of Teamwork?神经动力学组织是团队合作的基本属性吗?
Front Psychol. 2017 May 2;8:644. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00644. eCollection 2017.
3
Advancing Our Understandings of Healthcare Team Dynamics From the Simulation Room to the Operating Room: A Neurodynamic Perspective.从模拟室到手术室深化我们对医疗团队动态的理解:神经动力学视角
Front Psychol. 2019 Aug 12;10:1660. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01660. eCollection 2019.
4
Parsing Neurodynamic Information Streams to Estimate the Frequency, Magnitude and Duration of Team Uncertainty.解析神经动力学信息流以估计团队不确定性的频率、幅度和持续时间。
Front Syst Neurosci. 2021 Feb 1;15:606823. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2021.606823. eCollection 2021.
5
Modeling the neurodynamic organizations and interactions of teams.模拟团队的神经动力学组织与互动。
Soc Neurosci. 2016;11(2):123-39. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2015.1056883. Epub 2015 Jun 16.
6
Neuroergonomics: Quantitative Modeling of Individual, Shared, and Team Neurodynamic Information.神经工效学:个体、共享和团队神经动力学信息的定量建模。
Hum Factors. 2018 Nov;60(7):1022-1034. doi: 10.1177/0018720818781623. Epub 2018 Jun 15.
7
Toward a quantitative description of the neurodynamic organizations of teams.朝向团队神经动力学组织的定量描述。
Soc Neurosci. 2014;9(2):160-73. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2014.883324.
8
Measuring teamwork and taskwork of community-based "teams" delivering life-saving health interventions in rural Zambia: a qualitative study.测量赞比亚农村地区提供救生健康干预措施的以社区为基础的“团队”的团队合作和任务分工:一项定性研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Jun 27;13:84. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-84.
9
Distinguishing between taskwork and teamwork planning in teams: relations with coordination and interpersonal processes.区分团队中的任务工作和团队工作规划:与协调和人际过程的关系。
J Appl Psychol. 2014 May;99(3):423-36. doi: 10.1037/a0034625. Epub 2013 Nov 4.
10
Cross-cultural validation and psychometric testing of the French version of the TeamSTEPPS teamwork perceptions questionnaire.跨文化验证和心理计量测试法语版的团队 STEPPS 团队工作感知问卷。
J Health Organ Manag. 2024 Aug 29;38(6):923-941. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-01-2023-0004.

引用本文的文献

1
A novel multimodal, intraoperative cognitive workload assessment of cardiac surgery team members.一种针对心脏外科手术团队成员的新型多模式术中认知工作量评估方法。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2024 Jul 29. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2024.07.050.

本文引用的文献

1
Grand Field Challenges for Cognitive Neuroergonomics in the Coming Decade.未来十年认知神经工效学面临的重大领域挑战。
Front Neuroergon. 2021 Mar 8;2:643969. doi: 10.3389/fnrgo.2021.643969. eCollection 2021.
2
Removal of movement-induced EEG artifacts: current state of the art and guidelines.运动诱发电位 EEG 伪迹的去除:最新进展与指南。
J Neural Eng. 2022 Feb 28;19(1). doi: 10.1088/1741-2552/ac542c.
3
Time to move: Brain dynamics underlying natural action and cognition.行动的时间:自然动作和认知的大脑动力学基础。
Eur J Neurosci. 2021 Dec;54(12):8075-8080. doi: 10.1111/ejn.15562.
4
Introduction to the special issue: quantifying collectivity.特刊引言:集体性的量化
Theory Biosci. 2021 Nov;140(4):321-323. doi: 10.1007/s12064-021-00358-2. Epub 2021 Nov 17.
5
How to refocus attention on working memory representations following interruptions-Evidence from frontal theta and posterior alpha oscillations.中断后如何将注意力重新集中于工作记忆表征——来自额叶θ波和后α波振荡的证据
Eur J Neurosci. 2021 Dec;54(11):7820-7838. doi: 10.1111/ejn.15506. Epub 2021 Nov 18.
6
Examining Social Cognition with Embodied Robots: Does Prior Experience with a Robot Impact Feedback-associated Learning in a Gambling Task?使用具身机器人研究社会认知:与机器人的先前经验是否会影响赌博任务中与反馈相关的学习?
J Cogn. 2021 May 31;4(1):28. doi: 10.5334/joc.167.
7
Interacting brains coming in sync through their minds: an interbrain neurofeedback study.通过思维实现大脑同步互动:一项脑间神经反馈研究。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2021 Sep;1500(1):48-68. doi: 10.1111/nyas.14605. Epub 2021 May 6.
8
Allocation of resources in working memory: Theoretical and empirical implications for visual search.工作记忆中的资源分配:对视觉搜索的理论和经验影响。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2021 Aug;28(4):1093-1111. doi: 10.3758/s13423-021-01881-5. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
9
Parsing Neurodynamic Information Streams to Estimate the Frequency, Magnitude and Duration of Team Uncertainty.解析神经动力学信息流以估计团队不确定性的频率、幅度和持续时间。
Front Syst Neurosci. 2021 Feb 1;15:606823. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2021.606823. eCollection 2021.
10
The default mode network: where the idiosyncratic self meets the shared social world.默认模式网络:独特自我与共享社交世界相遇的地方。
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2021 Mar;22(3):181-192. doi: 10.1038/s41583-020-00420-w. Epub 2021 Jan 22.