Tran Sonia, Choi Vincent, Hepburn Kirsten, Hewitt Nathan, Zhou Joel, Chan Daniel L, Talbot Michael L
Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery Unit, St George Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
UNSW Department of Surgery, St George Clinical School, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
ANZ J Surg. 2017 Jul;87(7-8):560-564. doi: 10.1111/ans.13986. Epub 2017 May 16.
Acute cholecystitis is a common condition. Recent studies have shown an association between creation of an acute surgical unit (ASU) and improved outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of a subspecialty based approach to the management of acute cholecystitis as an alternative to the traditional 'generalist' general surgery approach or the ASU model.
A 6-year retrospective analysis of outcomes in patients admitted under a dedicated upper gastrointestinal service for acute cholecystitis undergoing emergency laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Seven hundred emergency laparoscopic cholecystectomies were performed over this time. A total of 486 patients were available for analysis. The median time to operation was 2 days and median length of operation was 80 min. A total of 86.9% were performed during daylight hours. Eight cases were converted to open surgery (1.6%). Intra-operative cholangiography was performed in 408 patients. The major complication rate was 8.2%, including retained common bile duct stones (2.3%), sepsis (0.2%), post-operative bleeding (0.4%), readmission (0.6%), bile leak (2.1%), AMI (0.4%), unscheduled return to theatre (0.6%) and pneumonia (0.8%). There were no mortalities and no common bile duct injuries.
Over a time period that encompasses the current publications on the ASU model, a subspecialty model of care has shown consistent results that exceed established benchmarks. Subspecialty management of complex elective pathologies has become the norm in general surgery and this study generates the hypothesis that subspecialty management of patients with complex emergency pathologies should be considered a valid alternative to ASU. Access block to emergency theatres delays treatment and prolongs hospital stay.
急性胆囊炎是一种常见病症。近期研究表明,设立急性外科单元(ASU)与改善治疗结果之间存在关联。本研究旨在评估采用基于亚专业的方法管理急性胆囊炎的效果,以替代传统的“全科”普通外科方法或ASU模式。
对在专门的上消化道服务部门收治的急性胆囊炎患者进行急诊腹腔镜胆囊切除术的结果进行为期6年的回顾性分析。
在此期间共进行了700例急诊腹腔镜胆囊切除术。共有486例患者可供分析。中位手术时间为2天,中位手术时长为80分钟。总共86.9%的手术在白天进行。8例转为开放手术(1.6%)。408例患者进行了术中胆管造影。主要并发症发生率为8.2%,包括胆总管结石残留(2.3%)、脓毒症(0.2%)、术后出血(0.4%)、再次入院(0.6%)、胆漏(2.1%)、急性心肌梗死(0.4%)、非计划重返手术室(0.6%)和肺炎(0.8%)。无死亡病例,也无胆总管损伤。
在涵盖当前关于ASU模式的出版物的时间段内,亚专业护理模式已显示出一致的结果,超过既定基准。复杂择期病症的亚专业管理已成为普通外科的常态,本研究提出假设,即复杂急诊病症患者的亚专业管理应被视为ASU的有效替代方案。急诊手术室的准入限制会延迟治疗并延长住院时间。