• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Sci-Fri PM: Planning-10: The replacement correction factors for cylindrical chambers in megavoltage beams.

作者信息

Wang L, Rogers Dwo

机构信息

Carleton University, Ottawa, ON.

出版信息

Med Phys. 2008 Jul;35(7Part3):3414. doi: 10.1118/1.2965982.

DOI:10.1118/1.2965982
PMID:28512897
Abstract

The replacement correction factor (P ) in ion chamber dosimetry accounts for the effects of the medium being replaced by the air cavity of the chamber. In TG-21, P was conceptually separated into two components: fluence correction, P , and gradient correction, P . In TG-51, for electron beams, the calibration is at d where P is required for cylindrical chambers and P is unknown and assumed to be the same as that for a beam having the same mean electron energy at d . For cylindrical chambers in high-energy photon beams, P also represents a major uncertainty in current dosimetry protocols. In this study, P is calculated with high precision (<0.1%) by the Monte Carlo method as the ratio of the dose in a phantom to the dose scored in water-walled cylindrical cavities of various radii (with the center of the cavity being the point of measurement) in both high energy photon and electron beams. It is found that, for electron beams, the mean electron energy at depth is a good beam quality specifier for P ; and TG-51's adoption of P at d with the same mean electron energy for use at d is proven to be accurate. For Farmer chambers in photon beams, there is essentially no beam quality dependence for P values. In a Co photon beam, the calculated P is about 0.4-0.6% higher than the TG-21 value, indicating TG-21 (and TG-51) used incorrect values of P for cylindrical chambers.

摘要

相似文献

1
Sci-Fri PM: Planning-10: The replacement correction factors for cylindrical chambers in megavoltage beams.
Med Phys. 2008 Jul;35(7Part3):3414. doi: 10.1118/1.2965982.
2
Replacement correction factors for cylindrical ion chambers in electron beams.电子束中圆柱形电离室的替换校正因子。
Med Phys. 2009 Oct;36(10):4600-8. doi: 10.1118/1.3213094.
3
Monte Carlo calculations of correction factors for plane-parallel ionization chambers in clinical electron dosimetry.临床电子剂量学中平行板电离室校正因子的蒙特卡罗计算。
Med Phys. 2008 Sep;35(9):4033-40. doi: 10.1118/1.2968102.
4
Monte Carlo calculations of electron beam quality conversion factors for several ion chamber types.几种电离室类型电子束质量转换因子的蒙特卡罗计算
Med Phys. 2014 Nov;41(11):111701. doi: 10.1118/1.4893915.
5
Study of the effective point of measurement for ion chambers in electron beams by Monte Carlo simulation.通过蒙特卡罗模拟研究电子束中电离室的有效测量点
Med Phys. 2009 Jun;36(6):2034-42. doi: 10.1118/1.3121490.
6
Monte Carlo calculations for reference dosimetry of electron beams with the PTW Roos and NE2571 ion chambers.PTW Roos 和 NE2571 电离室用于电子束参考剂量学的蒙特卡罗计算。
Med Phys. 2013 Dec;40(12):121722. doi: 10.1118/1.4829577.
7
Monte Carlo calculations of kQ, the beam quality conversion factor.蒙特卡罗法计算 kQ,束流品质转换系数。
Med Phys. 2010 Nov;37(11):5939-50. doi: 10.1118/1.3495537.
8
Reference dosimetry in clinical high-energy electron beams: comparison of the AAPM TG-51 and AAPM TG-21 dosimetry protocols.临床高能电子束参考剂量学:AAPM TG - 51与AAPM TG - 21剂量学协议的比较
Med Phys. 2001 Oct;28(10):2077-87. doi: 10.1118/1.1405841.
9
Effect of ICRU report 90 recommendations on Monte Carlo calculated k for ionization chambers listed in the Addendum to AAPM's TG-51 protocol.ICRU 报告 90 号建议对 TG-51 协议附录中列出的电离室的 Monte Carlo 计算 k 的影响。
Med Phys. 2019 Nov;46(11):5185-5194. doi: 10.1002/mp.13743. Epub 2019 Aug 31.
10
Calculation of the replacement correction factors for ion chambers in megavoltage beams by Monte Carlo simulation.通过蒙特卡罗模拟计算兆伏级射束中电离室的替换校正因子。
Med Phys. 2008 May;35(5):1747-55. doi: 10.1118/1.2898139.