Suppr超能文献

两种边缘型人格障碍测量工具的性别测量不变性。

Measurement Invariance Between Genders on Two Measures of Borderline Personality Disorder.

机构信息

Eastern Michigan University, Ypsilanti, Michigan.

University of Detroit Mercy, Detroit, Michigan.

出版信息

J Pers Disord. 2018 Feb;32(1):31-43. doi: 10.1521/pedi_2017_31_284. Epub 2017 May 17.

Abstract

Gender bias in the diagnosis and assessment of borderline personality disorder (BPD) has been the subject of much controversy in the psychological research literature. Evidence regarding differential prevalence rates and diagnostic rates in clinical settings between genders has been mixed, and measurement bias is one potential explanation for these mixed findings. A total of 340 participants were recruited from a Midwestern university and four outpatient community mental health clinics. They were administered two structured clinical interviews for BPD that were then evaluated for measurement invariance. Both the SCID-II BPD scale and the PDI-IV BPD scale were found to be measurement invariant between genders. No significant differences were found on the SCID-II BPD scale in diagnosis or overall number of criteria endorsed. However, in the rates of endorsement of individual criteria, differences were found in the unstable relationships item.

摘要

性别偏见在边缘型人格障碍(BPD)的诊断和评估中一直是心理学研究文献中争议的主题。关于性别之间在临床环境中的差异患病率和诊断率的证据一直存在争议,测量偏差是这些混合发现的一个潜在解释。共有 340 名参与者从一所中西部大学和四家社区门诊心理健康诊所招募。他们接受了两次 BPD 的结构化临床访谈,然后对这些访谈进行了测量不变性评估。SCID-II BPD 量表和 PDI-IV BPD 量表在性别之间都被发现具有测量不变性。在 SCID-II BPD 量表的诊断或总标准认可数量上没有发现显著差异。然而,在个别标准认可率方面,不稳定关系项目存在差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验