Suppr超能文献

DSM-IV 边缘型人格障碍标准的心理计量评估:标准功能的年龄和性别调节。

A psychometric evaluation of the DSM-IV borderline personality disorder criteria: age and sex moderation of criterion functioning.

机构信息

Virginia Institute for Psychiatric and Behavioral Genetics, Department of Psychiatry, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23298-0126, USA.

出版信息

Psychol Med. 2009 Dec;39(12):1967-78. doi: 10.1017/S0033291709005807. Epub 2009 Apr 29.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite its importance as a paradigmatic personality disorder, little is known about the measurement invariance of the DSM-IV borderline personality disorder (BPD) criteria; that is, whether the criteria assess the disorder equivalently across different groups.

METHOD

BPD criteria were evaluated at interview in 2794 young adult Norwegian twins. Analyses, based on item-response modeling, were conducted to test for differential age and sex moderation of the individual BPD criteria characteristics given factor-level covariate effects.

RESULTS

Confirmatory factor analytic results supported a unidimensional structure for the nine BPD criteria. Compared to males, females had a higher BPD factor mean, larger factor variance and there was a significant age by sex interaction on the factor mean. Strong differential sex and age by sex interaction effects were found for the 'impulsivity' criterion factor loading and threshold. Impulsivity related to the BPD factor poorly in young females but improved significantly in older females. Males reported more impulsivity compared to females and this difference increased with age. The 'affective instability' threshold was also moderated, with males reporting less than expected.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest the DSM-IV BPD 'impulsivity' and 'affective instability' criteria function differentially with respect to age and sex, with impulsivity being especially problematic. If verified, these findings have important implications for the interpretation of prior research with these criteria. These non-invariant age and sex effects may be identifying criteria-level expression features relevant to BPD nosology and etiology. Criterion functioning assessed using modern psychometric methods should be considered in the development of DSM-V.

摘要

背景

尽管边缘型人格障碍作为一种典范的人格障碍具有重要意义,但对于 DSM-IV 边缘型人格障碍(BPD)标准的测量不变性知之甚少;也就是说,这些标准是否在不同群体中同等地评估该障碍。

方法

在对 2794 名挪威年轻成年双胞胎进行访谈时,评估了 BPD 标准。基于项目反应建模的分析,对个体 BPD 标准特征进行了分析,以检验年龄和性别差异对各 BPD 标准特征的调节作用,同时考虑了因素水平协变量的影响。

结果

验证性因素分析结果支持九项 BPD 标准的单一维度结构。与男性相比,女性的 BPD 因子平均值更高,因子方差更大,且因子均值存在显著的性别年龄交互作用。在“冲动性”标准因子负荷和阈值方面,发现了强烈的性别和性别年龄交互作用差异。年轻女性的冲动性与 BPD 因子相关性较差,但在年长女性中显著改善。与女性相比,男性报告的冲动性更多,而且这种差异随年龄增长而增加。“情感不稳定”阈值也受到调节,男性报告的阈值低于预期。

结论

研究结果表明,DSM-IV BPD“冲动性”和“情感不稳定”标准在年龄和性别方面的功能存在差异,其中冲动性尤其成问题。如果得到证实,这些发现对使用这些标准进行的先前研究的解释具有重要意义。这些非不变的年龄和性别效应可能识别出与 BPD 分类学和病因学相关的标准水平表达特征。使用现代心理计量学方法评估标准功能应在 DSM-V 的制定中得到考虑。

相似文献

1
A psychometric evaluation of the DSM-IV borderline personality disorder criteria: age and sex moderation of criterion functioning.
Psychol Med. 2009 Dec;39(12):1967-78. doi: 10.1017/S0033291709005807. Epub 2009 Apr 29.
2
Structure of genetic and environmental risk factors for symptoms of DSM-IV borderline personality disorder.
JAMA Psychiatry. 2013 Nov;70(11):1206-14. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.1944.
4
Affect intensity and lability: the role of posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms in borderline personality disorder.
Depress Anxiety. 2011 May;28(5):393-9. doi: 10.1002/da.20798. Epub 2011 Feb 24.
6
Differentiating borderline personality disorder (BPD) from bipolar disorder: diagnostic efficiency of DSM BPD criteria.
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2020 Feb;141(2):142-148. doi: 10.1111/acps.13133. Epub 2019 Dec 13.
7
Examining sex differences in DSM-IV borderline personality disorder symptom expression using Item Response Theory (IRT).
J Psychiatr Res. 2014 Dec;59:213-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2014.08.019. Epub 2014 Sep 11.
8
Structure of borderline personality disorder symptoms in a nonclinical sample.
J Clin Psychol. 2007 Sep;63(9):805-16. doi: 10.1002/jclp.20398.
10
Borderline Criterion Function Across Age-Groups: A Cross-Sectional Mixed-Method Study.
Assessment. 2019 Sep;26(6):1014-1029. doi: 10.1177/1073191118786587. Epub 2018 Jul 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Measurement invariance on two self-report instruments for men and women with borderline personality disorder.
Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregul. 2025 May 12;12(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s40479-025-00296-1.
2
Heterogeneity of borderline personality disorder symptoms in help-seeking adolescents.
Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregul. 2021 Feb 26;8(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s40479-021-00147-9.
3
Adolescent suicide risk and experiences of dissociation in daily life.
Psychiatry Res. 2020 May;287:112870. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.112870. Epub 2020 Feb 17.
4
The relation between epistemic trust and borderline pathology in an adolescent inpatient sample.
Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregul. 2019 Aug 28;6:13. doi: 10.1186/s40479-019-0110-7. eCollection 2019.
7
Prediction of alcohol use disorder using personality disorder traits: a twin study.
Addiction. 2018 Jan;113(1):15-24. doi: 10.1111/add.13951. Epub 2017 Aug 23.
10
The contribution of familial internalizing and externalizing liability factors to borderline personality disorder.
Psychol Med. 2014 Aug;44(11):2397-407. doi: 10.1017/S0033291713003140. Epub 2014 Jan 9.

本文引用的文献

1
The nature of borderline personality disorder: multiple dimensions, multiple symptoms, but one category.
J Pers Disord. 2007 Oct;21(5):457-73. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2007.21.5.457.
2
An application of item response theory to the DSM-III-R criteria for borderline personality disorder.
J Pers Disord. 2007 Aug;21(4):418-33. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2007.21.4.418.
3
Structure of borderline personality disorder symptoms in a nonclinical sample.
J Clin Psychol. 2007 Sep;63(9):805-16. doi: 10.1002/jclp.20398.
5
Gender bias in diagnostic criteria for personality disorders: an item response theory analysis.
J Abnorm Psychol. 2007 Feb;116(1):166-75. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.116.1.166.
6
When does measurement invariance matter?
Med Care. 2006 Nov;44(11 Suppl 3):S176-81. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000245143.08679.cc.
7
Methodological issues in the assessment of substance use phenotypes.
Addict Behav. 2006 Jun;31(6):1010-34. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2006.03.047. Epub 2006 May 24.
8
Confirmatory factor analyses of DSM-IV Cluster C personality disorder criteria.
J Pers Disord. 2006 Apr;20(2):186-203. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2006.20.2.186.
10
An investigation of the prototype validity of the borderline DSM-IV construct.
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2004 Apr;109(4):289-98. doi: 10.1046/j.1600-0447.2003.00268.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验