Santos Gabriela Otero Dos, Milanesi Fernanda Carpes, Greggianin Bruna Frizon, Fernandes Marilene Issa, Oppermann Rui Vicente, Weidlich Patricia
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul - UFRGS, School of Dentistry, Department of Periodontology, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Braz Oral Res. 2017 May 4;31:e32. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2017.vol31.0032.
In recent years, different chlorhexidine formulations have been tested, including an alcohol-free alternative, but the effect of this solution on early biofilm formation is not clear. A crossover, randomized, double-blind clinical trial was conducted to evaluate the effect of two chlorhexidine solutions against supra- and subgingival biofilm formation (NCT#02656251). Thirty-five participants were randomized and asked to rinse twice daily with 15 ml of an alcohol-containing 0.12% chlorhexidine solution, an alcohol-free 0.12% chlorhexidine solution, or placebo. The study was conducted in three experimental periods of 4 days each, with a 10-day washout between the periods. All the experimental periods followed the same protocol, except that the solutions were switched. Biofilm distribution was evaluated every 24 hours by the Plaque-Free Zone Index, during 96 hours. Adverse events were self-reported and sensory evaluation was performed using a hedonic scale. Compared to the placebo, the chlorhexidine solutions resulted in a significantly higher number of surfaces free of plaque over 96 hours (p < 0.01), and were able to prevent subgingival biofilm formation (p < 0.01). The alcohol-free chlorhexidine solution was associated with a lower incidence of adverse events, compared with alcohol-containing chlorhexidine (p < 0.05); it also received better sensory evaluation and acceptance by trial participants, compared with the alcohol-containing chlorhexidine (p = 0.007), and had a similar inhibitory effect on the formation of supra- and subgingival biofilms.
近年来,已对不同的洗必泰制剂进行了测试,包括一种不含酒精的替代品,但该溶液对早期生物膜形成的影响尚不清楚。进行了一项交叉、随机、双盲临床试验,以评估两种洗必泰溶液对龈上和龈下生物膜形成的影响(NCT编号:02656251)。35名参与者被随机分组,并被要求每天用15毫升含酒精的0.12%洗必泰溶液、不含酒精的0.12%洗必泰溶液或安慰剂漱口两次。该研究分三个为期4天的实验阶段进行,各阶段之间有10天的洗脱期。除了溶液更换外,所有实验阶段均遵循相同的方案。在96小时内,每24小时通过无菌斑区指数评估生物膜分布。不良事件通过自我报告,使用享乐量表进行感官评估。与安慰剂相比,洗必泰溶液在96小时内导致无菌斑表面的数量显著增加(p<0.01),并能够预防龈下生物膜形成(p<0.01)。与含酒精的洗必泰相比,不含酒精的洗必泰溶液不良事件发生率较低(p<0.05);与含酒精的洗必泰相比,它在试验参与者中也获得了更好的感官评价和接受度(p=