Borrego Pedro, Gonçalves Maria Fátima, Gomes Perpétua, Araújo Lavínia, Moranguinho Inês, Figueiredo Inês Brito, Barahona Isabel, Rocha José, Mendonça Claudino, Cruz Maria Cesarina, Barreto Jorge, Taveira Nuno
Research Institute for Medicines (iMed.ULisboa), Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Centro de Administração e Políticas Públicas, Instituto Superior de Ciências Sociais e Políticas, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
J Clin Microbiol. 2017 Aug;55(8):2367-2379. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00235-17. Epub 2017 May 17.
HIV plasma viral load is an established marker of disease progression and of response to antiretroviral therapy, but currently there is no commercial assay validated for the quantification of viral load in HIV-2-infected individuals. We sought to make the first clinical evaluation of Cavidi ExaVir Load (version 3) in HIV-2-infected patients. Samples were collected from a total of 102 individuals living in Cape Verde, and the HIV-2 viral load was quantified by both ExaVir Load and a reference in-house real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) used in Portugal in 91 samples. The associations between viral load and clinical prognostic variables (CD4 T cell counts and antiretroviral therapy status) were similar for measurements obtained using ExaVir Load and qPCR. There was no difference between the two methods in the capacity to discriminate between nonquantifiable and quantifiable HIV-2 in the plasma. In samples with an HIV-2 viral load quantifiable by both methods ( = 27), the measurements were highly correlated (Pearson = 0.908), but the ExaVir Load values were systematically higher relative to those determined by qPCR (median difference, 0.942 log copies/ml). A regression model was derived that enables the conversion of ExaVir Load results to those that would have been obtained by the reference qPCR. In conclusion, ExaVir Load version 3 is a reliable commercial assay to measure viral load in HIV-2-infected patients and therefore a valuable alternative to the in-house assays in current use.
HIV血浆病毒载量是疾病进展和对抗逆转录病毒治疗反应的既定标志物,但目前尚无经商业验证可用于定量检测HIV-2感染个体病毒载量的检测方法。我们试图对HIV-2感染患者进行Cavidi ExaVir Load(第3版)的首次临床评估。从佛得角的102名个体中采集样本,并用ExaVir Load和葡萄牙使用的一种内部实时定量PCR(qPCR)参考方法对91份样本中的HIV-2病毒载量进行定量。使用ExaVir Load和qPCR获得的测量结果中,病毒载量与临床预后变量(CD4 T细胞计数和抗逆转录病毒治疗状态)之间的关联相似。两种方法在区分血浆中不可定量和可定量的HIV-2的能力上没有差异。在两种方法均可定量HIV-2病毒载量的样本(n = 27)中,测量结果高度相关(Pearson r = 0.908),但ExaVir Load值相对于qPCR测定的值系统性更高(中位数差异为0.942 log拷贝/ml)。推导了一个回归模型,可将ExaVir Load结果转换为参考qPCR本应获得的结果。总之,ExaVir Load第3版是一种可靠的商业检测方法,可用于测量HIV-2感染患者的病毒载量,因此是目前使用的内部检测方法的有价值替代方法。