• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种使种植体修复体旋转误差最小化的方法。

A Method for Minimizing Rotational Errors of Implant Prostheses.

作者信息

Lee Hyeonjong, Kwon Kung-Rock, Paek Janghyun, Pae Ahran, Noh Kwantae

出版信息

Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2017 September/October;32(5):1018–1022. doi: 10.11607/jomi.5324. Epub 2017 May 18.

DOI:10.11607/jomi.5324
PMID:28518184
Abstract

PURPOSE

Rotational errors of implants can occur during two stages: when connecting impression copings with implants, and when connecting impression copings with analogs. The aim of this study was to determine ways to minimize these rotational errors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Three types of implants were prepared: a tissue-level implant with an internal octagon 8-degree Morse taper connection, a bone-level implant with an internal hex 11-degree Morse taper connection, and a bone-level implant with an external hex connection. Each complex (n = 10 per group) was composed of an implant, an impression coping, and an analog. Implants were embedded in resin blocks and connected with corresponding impression copings. Analogs that reproduced the position of the implants were created by means of a custom-made transfer jig, and rotational errors were measured between implants and analogs. Impression copings and analogs were connected by means of four methods: The impression coping was connected to the implant in a clockwise (CW) or a counterclockwise (CCW) direction before tightening, and the analogs were then connected with impression copings and tightened using a hemostat (Hs) or by hand (Hd).

RESULTS

The CW-Hs and CCW-Hd groups exhibited low rotational error (mean ± standard deviation 0.11 ± 0.21 and 0.19 ± 0.34 degrees, respectively), whereas the CW-Hd and CCW-Hs groups exhibited high rotational error (-1.80 ± 0.67 and 2.07 ± 0.75, respectively) in different directions. A strong association was observed between the tightening method and rotational error, and a weak association was observed between the connection type and rotational error.

CONCLUSION

The CW-Hs method was found to be the most suitable for minimizing rotational error between implants and analogs.

摘要

目的

种植体的旋转误差可能在两个阶段出现:将印模帽与种植体连接时,以及将印模帽与代型连接时。本研究的目的是确定将这些旋转误差降至最低的方法。

材料与方法

制备三种类型的种植体:一种具有内部八角形8度莫氏锥度连接的软组织水平种植体、一种具有内部六边形11度莫氏锥度连接的骨水平种植体和一种具有外部六边形连接的骨水平种植体。每组(每组n = 10)的复合体均由一个种植体、一个印模帽和一个代型组成。将种植体嵌入树脂块中,并与相应的印模帽连接。通过定制的转移夹具制作再现种植体位置的代型,并测量种植体与代型之间的旋转误差。印模帽和代型通过四种方法连接:在拧紧之前,将印模帽以顺时针(CW)或逆时针(CCW)方向连接到种植体,然后使用止血钳(Hs)或手动(Hd)将代型与印模帽连接并拧紧。

结果

顺时针-止血钳组和逆时针-手动组表现出较低的旋转误差(分别为平均±标准差0.11±0.21度和0.19±0.34度),而顺时针-手动组和逆时针-止血钳组在不同方向上表现出较高的旋转误差(分别为-1.80±0.67度和2.07±0.75度)。在拧紧方法与旋转误差之间观察到强关联,在连接类型与旋转误差之间观察到弱关联。

结论

发现顺时针-止血钳方法最适合将种植体与代型之间的旋转误差降至最低。

相似文献

1
A Method for Minimizing Rotational Errors of Implant Prostheses.一种使种植体修复体旋转误差最小化的方法。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2017 September/October;32(5):1018–1022. doi: 10.11607/jomi.5324. Epub 2017 May 18.
2
Axial displacements in external and internal implant-abutment connection.轴向位移在外部和内部种植体-基台连接中。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014 Feb;25(2):e83-9. doi: 10.1111/clr.12062. Epub 2012 Oct 23.
3
Precision of fit between implant impression coping and implant replica pairs for three implant systems.三种种植体系统中种植体印模转移体与种植体复制体之间的拟合精度。
J Prosthet Dent. 2013 Jan;109(1):37-43. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60008-6.
4
The effect of repeated torque tightening on total lengths of implant abutments in different internal implant‒abutment connections.反复扭矩拧紧对不同种植体-基台内部连接中种植体基台总长度的影响。
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2017 Spring;11(2):110-116. doi: 10.15171/joddd.2017.020. Epub 2017 Jun 21.
5
Microleakage of the prosthetic abutment/implant interface with internal and external connection: in vitro study.具有内连接和外连接的修复基台/种植体界面的微渗漏:体外研究
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014 Sep;25(9):1078-83. doi: 10.1111/clr.12217. Epub 2013 Jul 4.
6
A Comparative Analysis of Master Casts Obtained using Different Surface Treatments on Impression Copings for Single Tooth Implant Replacement -An In vitro Study.单颗牙种植修复印模帽不同表面处理后所获工作模型的比较分析——一项体外研究
J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Aug;11(8):ZC102-ZC105. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/28372.10501. Epub 2017 Aug 1.
7
Effect of subgingival depth of implant placement on the dimensional accuracy of the implant impression: an in vitro study.种植体植入龈下深度对种植体印模尺寸精度的影响:一项体外研究。
J Prosthet Dent. 2008 Feb;99(2):107-13. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60026-8.
8
Accuracy of implant impressions with different impression coping types and shapes.不同印模台类型和形状的种植体印模精度。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012 Apr;14(2):218-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00241.x. Epub 2009 Oct 5.
9
Effects of Implant Angulation and Impression Coping Type on the Dimensional Accuracy of Impressions.种植体角度和印模帽类型对印模尺寸精度的影响。
Implant Dent. 2015 Dec;24(6):726-9. doi: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000336.
10
Accuracy of impression and pouring techniques for an implant-supported prosthesis.种植体支持修复体的印模和灌注技术的准确性。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008 Mar-Apr;23(2):226-36.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of the accuracy of dental casts manufactured with 3D printing technique in the All-on-4 treatment concept.在全口四植体治疗理念中对采用3D打印技术制造的牙模准确性的评估。
J Adv Prosthodont. 2022 Dec;14(6):379-387. doi: 10.4047/jap.2022.14.6.379. Epub 2022 Dec 22.
2
Biomechanical stress and microgap analysis of bone-level and tissue-level implant abutment structure according to the five different directions of occlusal loads.根据五种不同方向的咬合负荷对骨水平和组织水平种植体基台结构进行生物力学应力和微间隙分析。
J Adv Prosthodont. 2020 Oct;12(5):316-321. doi: 10.4047/jap.2020.12.5.316. Epub 2020 Oct 26.