• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

TU-E-BRB-10:使用CBCT进行SBRT定位时摆位误差的剂量学后果

TU-E-BRB-10: Dosimetric Consequences of Setup Errors Using CBCT for SBRT Localization.

作者信息

Mayyas E, Wen N, Liu D, Glide-Hurst C, Ajlouni M, Chetty I

机构信息

Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI.

出版信息

Med Phys. 2012 Jun;39(6Part24):3910. doi: 10.1118/1.4735959.

DOI:10.1118/1.4735959
PMID:28518698
Abstract

PURPOSE

Steep dose gradients and high dose per fraction in stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR or SBRT) necessitate highly accurate tumor localization. This study evaluates inter-fraction shifts, as defined by couch correction analysis, and investigates the effect of tumor location and internal target volume (ITV) on these shifts. In addition, residual errors associated with post-CBCT correction and their dosimetric consequences were quantified.

METHODS

Daily free-breathing (FB) CBCT images used for daily localization of 78 patients with non-small cell lung cancer were retrospectively evaluated. Among the population, 39 patients also received pre-treatment kV images after CBCT alignment. ITV inter-fraction displacement was evaluated by matching the CBCT and the FB helical CT images, and setup errors were quantified using orthogonal kV images. Associations between ITV location and inter-fraction motion were studied by categorizing tumors into the following locations: chest-wall seated (CWS) and island, peripheral, central, or upper, middle and lower. Dosimetric consequences for the patient with the largest setup error were explored.

RESULTS

ITV inter-fraction motion included the mean of the systematic error, ?inter=(-1.4, 2.0, 1.6) mm, standard deviation (SD) of the systematic error, Σinter=(2.1, 4.2, 2.9) mm, and SD of random errors, sinter=(2.2, 3.2, 3.6) mm. No significant associations were observed between inter-fraction shifts and tumor location or volume. Using CBCT for image guidance reduced the observed errors to μsetup=(-0.3, 0.1, 0.0) mm, Σsetup=(0.6, 0.6, 0.4) mm and ssetup=(1.2, 0.7, 0.7) mm. Dosimetric consequences for the patient with the largest setup error were explored. It was shown that a 3.0 mm setup margin was sufficient to provide greater than 95% dose coverage to the ITV.

CONCLUSION

CBCT image guidance reduced setup errors significantly such that 2-3 mm, population-based, setup margins provided proper dose coverage to the ITV. Further investigation of inter-and intrafraction error classification by tumor location is warranted.

摘要

目的

立体定向消融放疗(SABR 或 SBRT)中陡峭的剂量梯度和高的分次剂量需要高度精确的肿瘤定位。本研究评估了由治疗床校正分析定义的分次间位移,并研究了肿瘤位置和内部靶区体积(ITV)对这些位移的影响。此外,还对与CBCT校正后相关的残余误差及其剂量学后果进行了量化。

方法

回顾性评估了用于78例非小细胞肺癌患者每日定位的每日自由呼吸(FB)CBCT图像。在这些患者中,39例患者在CBCT校准后还接受了治疗前的kV图像。通过匹配CBCT和FB螺旋CT图像评估ITV分次间位移,并使用正交kV图像对摆位误差进行量化。通过将肿瘤分类为以下位置来研究ITV位置与分次间运动之间的关联:胸壁占位(CWS)和岛状、周围型、中央型或上、中、下型。探讨了摆位误差最大的患者的剂量学后果。

结果

ITV分次间运动包括系统误差的均值,?inter=(-1.4, 2.0, 1.6)mm,系统误差的标准差,Σinter=(2.1, 4.2, 2.9)mm,以及随机误差的标准差,sinter=(2.2, 3.2, 3.6)mm。未观察到分次间位移与肿瘤位置或体积之间存在显著关联。使用CBCT进行图像引导将观察到的误差降低至μsetup=(-0.3, 0.1, 0.0)mm,Σsetup=(0.6, 0.6, 0.4)mm和ssetup=(1.2, 0.7, 0.7)mm。探讨了摆位误差最大的患者的剂量学后果。结果表明,3.0mm的摆位边界足以向ITV提供大于95%的剂量覆盖。

结论

CBCT图像引导显著降低了摆位误差,使得基于人群的2-3mm摆位边界能够为ITV提供合适的剂量覆盖。有必要进一步按肿瘤位置对分次间和分次内误差分类进行研究。

相似文献

1
TU-E-BRB-10: Dosimetric Consequences of Setup Errors Using CBCT for SBRT Localization.TU-E-BRB-10:使用CBCT进行SBRT定位时摆位误差的剂量学后果
Med Phys. 2012 Jun;39(6Part24):3910. doi: 10.1118/1.4735959.
2
Evaluation of multiple image-based modalities for image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) of prostate carcinoma: a prospective study.评估多种基于图像的模式在前列腺癌图像引导放射治疗(IGRT)中的应用:一项前瞻性研究。
Med Phys. 2013 Apr;40(4):041707. doi: 10.1118/1.4794502.
3
SU-E-J-24: Image-Guidance Using Cone-Beam CT for Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) of Lung Cancer Patients: Bony Alignment or Soft Tissue Alignment?SU-E-J-24:使用锥形束CT对肺癌患者进行立体定向体部放疗(SBRT)的图像引导:骨对齐还是软组织对齐?
Med Phys. 2012 Jun;39(6Part6):3657. doi: 10.1118/1.4734857.
4
Effect of immobilization and performance status on intrafraction motion for stereotactic lung radiotherapy: analysis of 133 patients.固定和表现状态对立体定向肺放疗分次内运动的影响:133 例患者的分析。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Dec 1;81(5):1568-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.09.035. Epub 2010 Nov 13.
5
TU-E-BRB-04: Adaptive Stereotactic-Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) Planning for Lung Cancer.
Med Phys. 2012 Jun;39(6Part24):3908. doi: 10.1118/1.4735953.
6
Spine stereotactic body radiotherapy utilizing cone-beam CT image-guidance with a robotic couch: intrafraction motion analysis accounting for all six degrees of freedom.利用机器人治疗床的锥形束 CT 图像引导进行脊柱立体定向体放射治疗:考虑所有六个自由度的分次内运动分析。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Mar 1;82(3):e555-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.06.1980.
7
Translational and rotational localization errors in cone-beam CT based image-guided lung stereotactic radiotherapy.基于锥形束CT的图像引导肺部立体定向放射治疗中的平移和旋转定位误差。
Phys Med. 2016 Jul;32(7):859-65. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2016.05.055. Epub 2016 Jun 8.
8
Impact of immobilization on intrafraction motion for spine stereotactic body radiotherapy using cone beam computed tomography.使用锥形束计算机断层扫描评估脊柱立体定向体部放疗中固定对分次内运动的影响。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Oct 1;84(2):520-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.12.039. Epub 2012 Mar 6.
9
Dosimetric comparison of stereotactic body radiotherapy using 4D CT and multiphase CT images for treatment planning of lung cancer: evaluation of the impact on daily dose coverage.使用4D CT和多期CT图像进行立体定向体部放射治疗肺癌的剂量学比较:对每日剂量覆盖影响的评估
Radiother Oncol. 2009 Jun;91(3):314-24. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2008.11.018. Epub 2008 Dec 26.
10
Evaluation of the cone beam CT for internal target volume localization in lung stereotactic radiotherapy in comparison with 4D MIP images.评估锥形束 CT 与 4D MIP 图像在肺部立体定向放疗中对内部靶区定位的比较。
Med Phys. 2013 Nov;40(11):111709. doi: 10.1118/1.4823785.