Richardson P J, Meany B, Breckenridge A M, Grimmer S F, Johnston G D, Kondowe G
Department of Cardiology, Kings College Hospital, London, UK.
J Hum Hypertens. 1987 Dec;1(3):175-9.
The antihypertensive efficacy and tolerability of lisinopril, a new long acting angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor, and nifedipine, in a retard formulation, were compared in a randomized six month double-blind study, in 45 patients with essential hypertension. Lisinopril, 20 to 80 mg once daily and nifedipine retard, 20 to 40 mg twice daily, were equally effective in lowering blood pressure and controlling hypertension. There were however significantly more adverse effects (P less than 0.01) reported with nifedipine. No significant differences were observed between groups for laboratory values, although the lisinopril group showed a significant reduction in urinary protein excretion compared to baseline values. Lisinopril and nifedipine have equal efficacy in the treatment of essential hypertension but in this study lisinopril was better tolerated than nifedipine.
在一项针对45例原发性高血压患者的随机、为期6个月的双盲研究中,对新型长效血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂赖诺普利和缓释剂型硝苯地平的降压疗效及耐受性进行了比较。赖诺普利每日一次,剂量为20至80毫克,硝苯地平缓释片每日两次,剂量为20至40毫克,二者在降低血压和控制高血压方面同样有效。然而,硝苯地平报告的不良反应明显更多(P<0.01)。两组的实验室检查值未见显著差异,不过与基线值相比,赖诺普利组的尿蛋白排泄量显著降低。赖诺普利和硝苯地平在治疗原发性高血压方面疗效相当,但在本研究中,赖诺普利的耐受性优于硝苯地平。