• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

赖诺普利与硝苯地平缓释片治疗原发性高血压的疗效比较:一项双盲、安慰剂对照试验。

Comparative efficacy of lisinopril and nifedipine retard in essential hypertension: a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

作者信息

Richardson P J, Meany T B, Johnston G D, Kondowe G, Grimmer S F, Breckenridge A M

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Kings College Hospital, London, England.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1987;10 Suppl 10:S96-8.

PMID:2455154
Abstract

Lisinopril, a long-acting angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor, and the calcium channel blocker nifedipine in its retard formulation, were compared as monotherapy in a group of 45 patients with essential hypertension. Lisinopril in single daily doses (range 20-80 mg, median dose 40 mg) and nifedipine retard in twice daily doses (total daily dose range 40-80 mg, median dose 60 mg) were equally effective in controlling hypertension. The lisinopril group (n = 30), at baseline supine blood pressure 178/109 +/- 23/9 mm Hg (mean +/- 1 SD), after 12 weeks' therapy measured 148/88 +/- 27/14 mm Hg; the nifedipine group (n = 15), at baseline 185/110 +/- 23/11 mm Hg, after 12 weeks' therapy measured 151/89 +/- 14/10 mm Hg. The number of patients who experienced clinical adverse effects was significantly greater in the nifedipine group: 8 of 15 (53%) compared to 4 of 30 (13%) in the lisinopril group. The commonest adverse effects of patients on nifedipine were swollen ankles, flushing, and headache. Two patients on nifedipine were withdrawn from the study because of their adverse experiences. Of the patients on lisinopril there were single reports of flushing, ankle swelling, tiredness, and chest pain. No patient withdrew from lisinopril because of an adverse experience. No adverse laboratory experiences were recorded in either group. In conclusion, lisinopril and nifedipine retard were equally effective in controlling essential hypertension. Lisinopril was, however, better tolerated during this study.

摘要

赖诺普利是一种长效血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂,将其与缓释制剂的钙通道阻滞剂硝苯地平作为单一疗法,在45例原发性高血压患者中进行了比较。赖诺普利每日单次给药(剂量范围20 - 80毫克,中位剂量40毫克)和硝苯地平缓释片每日两次给药(每日总剂量范围40 - 80毫克,中位剂量60毫克)在控制高血压方面同样有效。赖诺普利组(n = 30),基线仰卧位血压为178/109±23/9毫米汞柱(平均值±1标准差),经过12周治疗后为148/88±27/14毫米汞柱;硝苯地平组(n = 15),基线血压为185/110±23/11毫米汞柱,经过12周治疗后为151/89±14/10毫米汞柱。硝苯地平组出现临床不良反应的患者数量明显更多:15例中有8例(53%),而赖诺普利组30例中有4例(13%)。服用硝苯地平的患者最常见的不良反应是脚踝肿胀、面部潮红和头痛。两名服用硝苯地平的患者因不良反应退出研究。服用赖诺普利的患者有单次出现面部潮红、脚踝肿胀、疲劳和胸痛的报告。没有患者因不良反应退出赖诺普利治疗组。两组均未记录到不良实验室检查结果。总之,赖诺普利和硝苯地平缓释片在控制原发性高血压方面同样有效。然而,在本研究中赖诺普利的耐受性更好。

相似文献

1
Comparative efficacy of lisinopril and nifedipine retard in essential hypertension: a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.赖诺普利与硝苯地平缓释片治疗原发性高血压的疗效比较:一项双盲、安慰剂对照试验。
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1987;10 Suppl 10:S96-8.
2
Lisinopril in essential hypertension: a six month comparative study with nifedipine.赖诺普利治疗原发性高血压:与硝苯地平的六个月对照研究。
J Hum Hypertens. 1987 Dec;1(3):175-9.
3
Comparative trial of lisinopril and nifedipine in mild to severe essential hypertension.赖诺普利与硝苯地平治疗轻至重度原发性高血压的对比试验。
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1987;9 Suppl 3:S49-52.
4
Lisinopril versus slow-release nifedipine in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension: a multicentre study. The Cooperative Study Group.赖诺普利与缓释硝苯地平治疗轻至中度高血压的多中心研究。协作研究组
J Hum Hypertens. 1989 Jun;3 Suppl 1:29-33.
5
Lisinopril versus slow release nifedipine in patients with essential hypertension: a multicentre study.赖诺普利与缓释硝苯地平治疗原发性高血压患者的多中心研究
J Hum Hypertens. 1994 Oct;8(10):777-80.
6
Twenty-four hour blood pressure effect of once-daily lisinopril, enalapril, and placebo in patients with mild to moderate hypertension.赖诺普利、依那普利及安慰剂每日一次给药对轻至中度高血压患者24小时血压的影响
J Hum Hypertens. 1992 Aug;6(4):325-31.
7
Lisinopril or nifedipine in essential hypertension? A Norwegian multicenter study on efficacy, tolerability and quality of life in 828 patients.赖诺普利与硝苯地平治疗原发性高血压?一项针对828例患者的疗效、耐受性及生活质量的挪威多中心研究。
J Hypertens. 1991 Dec;9(12):1097-104.
8
[Treatment with lisinopril or nifedipine in essential hypertension. A Norwegian multicenter study of the effect, tolerance and quality of life of 828 patients].[赖诺普利或硝苯地平治疗原发性高血压。挪威对828例患者的疗效、耐受性及生活质量的多中心研究]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1992 Nov 10;112(27):3432-6.
9
Greater reduction of urinary albumin excretion in hypertensive type II diabetic patients with incipient nephropathy by lisinopril than by nifedipine.赖诺普利比硝苯地平能更有效地降低患有早期肾病的高血压II型糖尿病患者的尿白蛋白排泄量。
J Hum Hypertens. 1996 Mar;10(3):185-92.
10
Comparison of the effects of an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor and a calcium antagonist in hypertensive, macroproteinuric diabetic patients: a randomised double-blind study.血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂与钙拮抗剂对高血压合并大量蛋白尿糖尿病患者疗效的比较:一项随机双盲研究。
J Hum Hypertens. 1993 Aug;7(4):333-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Long-acting nifedipine in the management of essential hypertension: a review for cardiologists.长效硝苯地平在原发性高血压治疗中的应用:心血管科医生的综述
Am J Cardiovasc Dis. 2024 Dec 15;14(6):396-413. doi: 10.62347/RPMZ6407. eCollection 2024.
2
Comparative efficacy and safety of enalapril and sustained-release nifedipine in patients with mild to moderate hypertension. The Enalapril vs Nifedipine French Study Group.依那普利与硝苯地平缓释片治疗轻至中度高血压患者的疗效及安全性比较。依那普利与硝苯地平法国研究组
Drugs. 1990;39 Suppl 2:67-72. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199000392-00013.