• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单独定制的戒烟电子邮件的随机对照试验。

Randomised controlled trial of stand-alone tailored emails for smoking cessation.

机构信息

Behavioral Research Center, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.

出版信息

Tob Control. 2018 Mar;27(2):136-146. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053056. Epub 2017 May 18.

DOI:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053056
PMID:28522745
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Digital technology has created opportunities for delivering smoking cessation assistance at the population level. However, the efficacy of sending multiple, automated, tailored emails providing motivation, support and information for quitting is unknown.

METHODS

Smokers planning to quit (n=1070) were randomly assigned to (1) 27 tailored cessation emails (deluxe email group (DEG)), (2) 3 to 4 tailored emails with links to downloadable booklets (basic email group (BEG)) or (3) a single non-tailored email (single email group (SEG)). All emails included links to quitting resources. Self-reported 7-day point-prevalence abstinence was assessed at 1 month, 3 months and 6 months postenrolment.

RESULTS

Across follow-ups, abstinence was significantly greater for smokers in the DEG (34%) compared with the SEG (25.8%; OR=1.47, 95% CI 1.07 to 2.02, p=0.02) but there was no difference between the BEG (30.8%) and the SEG (p=0.13). Results were independent of baseline cigarettes per day, interest in quitting, smoker in household, use of nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) or varenicline and gender, themselves associated with abstinence (ps<0.05). Missing=smoking and multiple imputation analyses based on 25 data sets corroborated results. Participants in the DEG were also more likely to use non-medication aids (eg, quit smoking website, cessation class/clinic) compared with the SEG (OR=1.34, p=0.02, CI 1.06 to 1.71), but use of these or NRT by the 4-week follow-up (vs no use) increased abstinence across follow-ups primarily for those in the SEG.

CONCLUSIONS

Stand-alone tailored, multiple emails providing support, motivation and information during a quit attempt are an easily deployable, inexpensive mode of providing effective cessation assistance to large numbers of smokers planning to quit.

摘要

简介

数字技术为在人群层面提供戒烟辅助创造了机会。然而,发送多个自动化、定制化的电子邮件来提供戒烟动机、支持和信息的效果尚不清楚。

方法

计划戒烟的吸烟者(n=1070)被随机分配到以下三组:(1)27 封定制化戒烟邮件(豪华邮件组(DEG));(2)3-4 封带有可下载手册链接的定制化邮件(基本邮件组(BEG));或(3)一封非定制化邮件(单封邮件组(SEG))。所有电子邮件均包含戒烟资源的链接。在入组后 1 个月、3 个月和 6 个月评估 7 天点预率戒烟率。

结果

在随访期间,DEG 组的戒烟率(34%)显著高于 SEG 组(25.8%;OR=1.47,95%CI 1.07 至 2.02,p=0.02),但 BEG 组(30.8%)与 SEG 组之间无差异(p=0.13)。结果与每天吸烟量、戒烟意愿、家庭中吸烟者、尼古丁替代疗法(NRT)或伐尼克兰的使用以及性别无关,这些因素本身与戒烟有关(p<0.05)。缺失=吸烟,基于 25 个数据集的多重插补分析结果一致。与 SEG 组相比,DEG 组的参与者更有可能使用非药物辅助手段(例如,戒烟网站、戒烟课程/诊所)(OR=1.34,p=0.02,CI 1.06 至 1.71),但在 4 周随访时(与未使用相比)使用这些手段或 NRT 会增加所有随访期间的戒烟率,尤其是 SEG 组的参与者。

结论

在戒烟尝试期间提供支持、动机和信息的独立定制化、多封电子邮件是向计划戒烟的大量吸烟者提供有效戒烟辅助的一种易于部署、经济实惠的方式。

相似文献

1
Randomised controlled trial of stand-alone tailored emails for smoking cessation.单独定制的戒烟电子邮件的随机对照试验。
Tob Control. 2018 Mar;27(2):136-146. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053056. Epub 2017 May 18.
2
A digital smoking cessation program delivered through internet and cell phone without nicotine replacement (happy ending): randomized controlled trial.一项通过互联网和手机提供的无尼古丁替代的数字戒烟计划(皆大欢喜结局):随机对照试验
J Med Internet Res. 2008 Nov 28;10(5):e51. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1005.
3
To Text or Not to Text? Technology-based Cessation Communication Preferences among Urban, Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Smokers.是否发短信?城市中社会经济地位处于劣势的吸烟者对基于技术的戒烟交流方式的偏好。
Ethn Dis. 2018 Jul 12;28(3):161-168. doi: 10.18865/ed.28.3.161. eCollection 2018 Summer.
4
[Smoking reduction and temporary abstinence: new approaches for smoking cessation].[减少吸烟与临时戒烟:戒烟的新方法]
J Mal Vasc. 2003 Dec;28(5):293-300.
5
Efficacy of varenicline combined with nicotine replacement therapy vs varenicline alone for smoking cessation: a randomized clinical trial.伐尼克兰联合尼古丁替代疗法与单用伐尼克兰治疗戒烟的疗效:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2014 Jul;312(2):155-61. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.7195.
6
Effects of Nicotine Patch vs Varenicline vs Combination Nicotine Replacement Therapy on Smoking Cessation at 26 Weeks: A Randomized Clinical Trial.尼古丁贴片与伐尼克兰对比联合尼古丁替代疗法对26周戒烟效果的影响:一项随机临床试验
JAMA. 2016 Jan 26;315(4):371-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.19284.
7
Comparing the efficacy of two Internet-based, computer-tailored smoking cessation programs: a randomized trial.比较两种基于互联网的、计算机定制的戒烟方案的疗效:一项随机试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2005 Mar 8;7(1):e2. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7.1.e2.
8
Motivating smokers at outdoor public smoking hotspots to have a quit attempt with a nicotine replacement therapy sample: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.在户外公共吸烟热点地区激励吸烟者尝试使用尼古丁替代疗法戒烟:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2016 Jul 26;17(1):355. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1485-z.
9
A mechanistic test of nicotine replacement therapy sampling for smoking cessation induction.尼古丁替代疗法抽样用于戒烟诱导的机制性试验。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2015 Jun;29(2):392-9. doi: 10.1037/adb0000035. Epub 2014 Oct 27.
10
Flexible, dual-form nicotine replacement therapy or varenicline in comparison with nicotine patch for smoking cessation: a randomized controlled trial.灵活的双剂型尼古丁替代疗法或伐尼克兰与尼古丁贴片用于戒烟的比较:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Med. 2016 Jun 7;14:80. doi: 10.1186/s12916-016-0626-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Longitudinal analysis of peer social support and quitting Smoking: Moderation by sex and implications for cessation interventions.同伴社会支持与戒烟的纵向分析:性别调节作用及对戒烟干预的启示
Prev Med Rep. 2022 Nov 15;30:102059. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2022.102059. eCollection 2022 Dec.
2
A Smartphone-Based Information Communication Technology Solution for Primary Modifiable Risk Factors for Noncommunicable Diseases: Pilot and Feasibility Study in Norway.一种基于智能手机的非传染性疾病主要可改变风险因素的信息通信技术解决方案:挪威的试点和可行性研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Feb 25;6(2):e33636. doi: 10.2196/33636.
3
Evaluating the use of a recommender system for selecting optimal messages for smoking cessation: patterns and effects of user-system engagement.
评估推荐系统在选择最佳戒烟信息中的应用:用户与系统互动的模式和效果。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Sep 26;21(1):1749. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11803-8.
4
Psychographic Profiling of Adult Tobacco Users and Implications for Mediated Message Tailoring.成年烟草使用者的心理特征剖析及其对媒介信息定制的启示
Am J Health Promot. 2021 May;35(4):483-490. doi: 10.1177/0890117120967193. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
5
Tailored Web-Based Smoking Interventions and Reduced Attrition: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.基于网络的个性化戒烟干预措施可降低脱落率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Oct 19;22(10):e16255. doi: 10.2196/16255.
6
Digital interventions in the treatment of cardiovascular risk factors and atherosclerotic vascular disease.数字干预在心血管危险因素和动脉粥样硬化性血管疾病治疗中的应用
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2020 Jan 24;26:100470. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2020.100470. eCollection 2020 Feb.
7
Replicating state Quitline innovations to increase reach: findings from three states.复制州戒烟热线创新以扩大服务范围:三个州的发现。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Jan 6;20(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-8104-3.
8
Comparing the Efficacy of an Identical, Tailored Smoking Cessation Intervention Delivered by Mobile Text Messaging Versus Email: Randomized Controlled Trial.比较通过手机短信和电子邮件提供的相同定制戒烟干预措施的效果:随机对照试验。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Sep 27;7(9):e12137. doi: 10.2196/12137.
9
Smoking Patterns and Willingness to Quit: A Cross-sectional Study in Al Ain City, UAE.吸烟模式与戒烟意愿:阿联酋艾因市的一项横断面研究。
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2019 Jul-Sep;11(3):276-283. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.JPBS_30_19.
10
Smoking cessation interventions for potential use in the lung cancer screening setting: A systematic review and meta-analysis.用于肺癌筛查环境的潜在戒烟干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lung Cancer. 2019 Sep;135:205-216. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2019.06.024. Epub 2019 Jul 6.