Suppr超能文献

如何确定慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者的健康状况受损:一项基于人群的研究结果

How to determine an impaired health status in COPD: Results from a population-based study.

作者信息

Smid D E, Spruit M A, Deeg D J H, Huisman M, Poppelaars J, M Wouters E F, Franssen F M E

机构信息

Department of Research & Education, CIRO, Horn, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Neth J Med. 2017 May;75(4):151-157.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is associated with a significantly impaired health status and lost work productivity across all degrees of airflow limitation. The current study investigated whether an impaired health status is better represented by the recommended COPD Assessment Test (CAT) cut-point of 10 points, or the 95th percentile of the CAT score in a non-COPD population. Additionally, the impact of COPD on health status in a Dutch population, after stratification for work status, was measured.

METHODS

Demographics, clinical characteristics, post-bronchodilator spirometry, and CAT were assessed in subjects from the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam (LASA), a large Dutch population-based study. Normative values for the CAT score were described by percentiles using the mean, standard deviation, median and range.

RESULTS

In total, 810 COPD and non-COPD subjects (50.4% male, mean age 60.5 ±; 2.9 years) were analysed. Significant differences were observed in CAT scores between non-COPD and COPD subjects (6.7 ±; 5.2 vs. 9.5 ±; 5.9, p < 0.001 respectively). The proportion of COPD subjects with an impaired health status differed between applying the CAT ≥ 10 cut-point (50.0%) and applying the 95th percentile of CAT in non-COPD subjects (> 18 cut-point; 7.6%). Higher CAT scores were seen in working COPD patients compared with working non-COPD subjects (9.3 ±; 5.2 vs. 6.0 ±; 4.6, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

We suggest a CAT cut-point of > 18 points to indicate an impaired health status in COPD. This would imply an adaptation of the current GOLD classification of the disease.

摘要

背景

慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)与所有程度气流受限情况下显著受损的健康状况及工作生产力丧失相关。本研究调查了以推荐的慢性阻塞性肺疾病评估测试(CAT)切点10分,还是以非慢性阻塞性肺疾病人群中CAT分数的第95百分位数来更好地体现受损的健康状况。此外,还测量了在荷兰人群中,按工作状态分层后慢性阻塞性肺疾病对健康状况的影响。

方法

对来自阿姆斯特丹纵向衰老研究(LASA)的受试者进行人口统计学、临床特征、支气管扩张剂后肺功能测定和CAT评估,LASA是一项基于荷兰人群的大型研究。使用均值、标准差、中位数和范围通过百分位数描述CAT分数的标准值。

结果

总共分析了810名慢性阻塞性肺疾病和非慢性阻塞性肺疾病受试者(男性占50.4%,平均年龄60.5±2.9岁)。非慢性阻塞性肺疾病和慢性阻塞性肺疾病受试者的CAT分数存在显著差异(分别为6.7±5.2和9.5±5.9,p<0.001)。应用CAT≥10切点(50.0%)和应用非慢性阻塞性肺疾病受试者中CAT的第95百分位数(>18切点;7.6%)时,健康状况受损的慢性阻塞性肺疾病受试者比例不同。与在职非慢性阻塞性肺疾病受试者相比,在职慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的CAT分数更高(9.3±5.2对6.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验