Hafskjold Linda, Sundling Vibeke, van Dulmen Sandra, Eide Hilde
Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, University College of Southeast Norway, PoBox 7053, N-3007 Drammen, Norway.
NIVEL (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research), Utrecht, The Netherlands.
BMC Nurs. 2017 May 16;16:24. doi: 10.1186/s12912-017-0220-8. eCollection 2017.
Responding to older people's distress by acknowledging or encouraging further discussion of emotions is central to supportive, person-centred communication, and may enhance home care outcomes and thereby promote healthy aging. This observational study describes nursing staff's responses to older people's emotional distress, and identify factors that encourage further emotional disclosure.
Audio-recorded home care visits in Norway ( = 196), including 48 older people and 33 nursing staff, were analysed with the Verona Coding Definitions of Emotional Sequences, identifying expressions of emotional distress and subsequent provider responses. The inter-rater reliability (two coders), Cohen's kappa, was >0.6. Sum categories of emotional distress were constructed: a) verbal and non-verbal expressions referring to emotion, b) references to unpleasant states/circumstances, and c) contextual hints of emotion. A binary variable was constructed based on the VR response codes, differentiating between emotion-focused responses and responses that distanced emotion. Fisher's exact test was used to analyse group differences and determined variables included in a multivariate logistic regression analysis to identify factors promoting emotion-focused responses.
Older people's expressions of emotional distress ( = 635) comprised 63 explicit concerns and 572 cues. Forty-eight per cent of nursing staff responses ( = 638) were emotion-focused. Emotion-focused responses were observed more frequently when nursing staff elicited the expression of emotional distress from the patients (54%) than when patients expressed their emotional distress on their own initiative (39%). Expressions with reference to emotion most often received emotion-focused responses (60%), whereas references to unpleasant states or circumstances and contextual hints of emotion most often received non-emotion-focused responses (59%). In a multivariate logistic model, nursing staff's elicitation of the emotional expression (vs patients initiating it) and patients' expression with a reference to an emotion (vs reference to unpleasant states or contextual hints) were both explanatory variables for emotion-focused responses.
Emotion-focused responses were promoted when nursing staff elicited the emotional expression, and when the patient expression referred to an emotion. Staff responded most often by acknowledging the distress and using moderately person-centred supportive communication. More research is needed to establish generalizability of the findings and whether older people deem such responses supportive.
通过承认或鼓励进一步讨论情绪来回应老年人的困扰,是支持性、以人为本的沟通的核心,可能会改善家庭护理效果,从而促进健康老龄化。这项观察性研究描述了护理人员对老年人情绪困扰的反应,并确定了鼓励进一步情感表露的因素。
对挪威196次家庭护理访视的录音进行分析(其中包括48名老年人和33名护理人员),采用情感序列的维罗纳编码定义,识别情绪困扰的表达以及随后护理人员的反应。评分者间信度(两名编码员),科恩kappa系数>0.6。构建了情绪困扰的汇总类别:a)提及情绪的言语和非言语表达,b)提及不愉快状态/情况,以及c)情绪的情境暗示。基于VR反应代码构建了一个二元变量,区分以情绪为中心的反应和疏离情绪的反应。采用Fisher精确检验分析组间差异,并确定纳入多因素逻辑回归分析的变量,以识别促进以情绪为中心反应的因素。
老年人的情绪困扰表达(n = 635)包括63个明确的担忧和572个线索。48%的护理人员反应(n = 638)是以情绪为中心的。当护理人员引导患者表达情绪困扰时(54%),比患者主动表达情绪困扰时(39%),以情绪为中心的反应更频繁地被观察到。提及情绪的表达最常得到以情绪为中心的反应(60%),而提及不愉快状态或情况以及情绪的情境暗示最常得到非以情绪为中心的反应(59%)。在多因素逻辑模型中,护理人员引导情绪表达(与患者主动表达相比)以及患者提及情绪的表达(与提及不愉快状态或情境暗示相比)都是以情绪为中心反应的解释变量。
当护理人员引导情绪表达以及患者表达提及情绪时,以情绪为中心的反应会得到促进。工作人员最常通过承认困扰并使用适度以人为本的支持性沟通来做出回应。需要更多研究来确定这些发现的普遍性,以及老年人是否认为此类反应具有支持性。