Zaman Shafquat, Chapman Warren, Mohammed Imtiyaz, Gill Kathryn, Ward Stephen Thomas
Department of General Surgery, Sandwell & West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, Sandwell General Hospital, West Bromwich, UK.
Nurse Consultant and Clinical Lead for Endoscopy at City Hospital Endoscopy Unit, Sandwell & West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, Birmingham City Hospital, Birmingham, UK.
Intest Res. 2017 Apr;15(2):195-202. doi: 10.5217/ir.2017.15.2.195. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Traditionally, patients with acute diverticulitis undergo follow-up endoscopy to exclude colorectal cancer (CRC). However, its usefulness has been debated in this era of high-resolution computed tomography (CT) diagnosis. We assessed the frequency and outcome of endoscopic follow-up for patients with CT-proven acute diverticulitis, according to the confidence in the CT diagnosis.
Records of patients with CT-proven acute diverticulitis between October 2007 and March 2014 at Sandwell & West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust were retrieved. The National Cancer Registry confirmed the cases of CRC. Endoscopy quality indicators were compared between these patients and other patients undergoing the same endoscopic examination over the same period.
We identified 235 patients with CT-proven acute diverticulitis, of which, 187 were managed conservatively. The CT report was confident of the diagnosis of acute diverticulitis in 75% cases. Five of the 235 patients were subsequently diagnosed with CRC (2.1%). Three cases of CRC were detected in the 187 patients managed conservatively (1.6%). Forty-eight percent of the conservatively managed patients underwent follow-up endoscopy; one case of CRC was identified. Endoscopies were often incomplete and caused more discomfort for patients with diverticulitis compared with controls.
CRC was diagnosed in patients with CT-proven diverticulitis at a higher rate than in screened asymptomatic populations, necessitating follow-up. CT reports contained statements regarding diagnostic uncertainty in 25% cases, associated with an increased risk of CRC. Follow-up endoscopy in patients with CT-proven diverticulitis is associated with increased discomfort and high rates of incompletion. The use of other follow-up modalities should be considered.
背景/目的:传统上,急性憩室炎患者需接受随访内镜检查以排除结直肠癌(CRC)。然而,在高分辨率计算机断层扫描(CT)诊断的时代,其效用一直存在争议。我们根据对CT诊断的信心,评估了CT证实的急性憩室炎患者内镜随访的频率及结果。
检索了2007年10月至2014年3月在桑德韦尔和西伯明翰医院国民保健服务信托基金中CT证实为急性憩室炎患者的记录。国家癌症登记处确认了CRC病例。将这些患者与同期接受相同内镜检查的其他患者的内镜质量指标进行比较。
我们确定了235例CT证实为急性憩室炎的患者,其中187例接受了保守治疗。CT报告对75%的病例确诊为急性憩室炎有信心。235例患者中有5例随后被诊断为CRC(2.1%)。在187例接受保守治疗的患者中检测到3例CRC(1.6%)。48%接受保守治疗的患者接受了随访内镜检查;发现1例CRC。与对照组相比,内镜检查往往不完整,给憩室炎患者带来更多不适。
CT证实的憩室炎患者中CRC的诊断率高于筛查的无症状人群,因此需要进行随访。CT报告在25%的病例中包含关于诊断不确定性的陈述,这与CRC风险增加相关。CT证实的憩室炎患者的随访内镜检查会增加不适且不完整率高。应考虑使用其他随访方式。