Huang Lei, Rao Chao, van der Kuijp Tsering Jan, Bi Jun, Liu Yang
State Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resource Reuse, School of the Environment, Nanjing University, Xianlin Campus, Box 624, 163 Xianlin Avenue, Nanjing 210023, China; Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, P.O. Box 1000, 61 Rt. 9W. Palisades, NY 10964, USA.
State Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resource Reuse, School of the Environment, Nanjing University, Xianlin Campus, Box 624, 163 Xianlin Avenue, Nanjing 210023, China.
Environ Res. 2017 Aug;157:78-86. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2017.05.012. Epub 2017 May 17.
Atmospheric pollution has emerged as a major public health issue in China. Public perception and acceptable risk levels of air pollution can prompt individual behavioral changes and play a major role in the public's response to health risks. Therefore, to explore these responses and evaluate what constitutes publicly acceptable concentrations of fine particulate matter (PM), questionnaire surveys were conducted in three representative cities of China: Beijing, Nanjing, and Guangzhou. Great differences in public risk perception were revealed. Public perception of the health effects of air pollution (Effect) and familiarity with it (Familiarity) were significantly higher in the winter than in the summer, and also during severe haze days compared with typical days. The public perception of trust in the government (Trust) was consistent across all conditions. Exposure to severe haze pollution and experiencing harms from it were key factors influencing public willingness to respond to haze. These results reflected individual exposure levels correlating closely with risk perception and acceptance of PM. However, a crucial gap exists between public acceptable risk levels (PARL) of air pollution and the policy objectives of the State Council's Action Plan. Thus, policymakers can utilize this study to develop more targeted measures to combat air pollution.
大气污染已成为中国一个主要的公共卫生问题。公众对空气污染的认知以及可接受的风险水平能够促使个人行为发生改变,并在公众应对健康风险方面发挥重要作用。因此,为了探究这些反应并评估什么构成了公众可接受的细颗粒物(PM)浓度,在中国三个具有代表性的城市——北京、南京和广州开展了问卷调查。结果显示公众风险认知存在很大差异。公众对空气污染健康影响的认知(影响)以及对空气污染的熟悉程度(熟悉度)在冬季显著高于夏季,并且在重度雾霾天高于典型天气。公众对政府的信任度(信任)在所有情况下保持一致。暴露于重度雾霾污染并身受其害是影响公众应对雾霾意愿的关键因素。这些结果表明个人暴露水平与对PM的风险认知和接受程度密切相关。然而,空气污染的公众可接受风险水平(PARL)与国务院行动计划的政策目标之间存在关键差距。因此,政策制定者可以利用本研究制定更具针对性的措施来应对空气污染。