Tolvanen Mimmi, Puijola Katri, Armfield Jason M, Lahti Satu
Department of Community Dentistry, Institute of Dentistry, FI-20014 University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
FinnBrain Study Group, Department of Psychiatry and Turku Brain and Mind Center, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
BMC Oral Health. 2017 May 19;17(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s12903-017-0375-4.
Dental fear accounts for 41% of the non-habitual dental attendance such as visiting only when in pain among adult Finns. Dentists should be able to recognize patients in risk for irregular attendance due to dental fear and measure their fear with valid and reliable instrument that capture the multidimensionality of dental fear. The study's aim was to translate the Index of Dental Anxiety and Fear (IDAF-4C+) into Finnish and test its reliability and validity.
The study population consisted of dental students in a Finnish university (n = 202). The IDAF-4C was back-and forward translated by experts as well as a native English translator, blinded to the original version. Reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha. Validity of the IDAF-4C was assessed against the Modified Dental Anxiety Scale (MDAS) using Spearman correlation coefficients and through the use of Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and between genders using Mann-Whitney U tests.
The reliability of the IDAF-4C was good, the Cronbach's alpha being 0.88. The IDAF-4C and MDAS and their subscales were correlated, with coefficients varying between 0.34 and 0.85. Correlations were stronger with the emotional and physiological components of the IDAF-4C. EFA revealed one factor explaining 51.7% of the common variance (eigenvalue = 4.6). Women tended to have slightly higher mean scores than men (1.49 vs. 1.36, p = 0.247).
The translation and localization of the Finnish version of the IDAF-4C can be considered as providing some evidence of the validity and reliability of the scale. It adds to previously used measures as it considers also the behavioral, cognitive and physiological dimension involved in dental fear.
在芬兰成年人中,牙科恐惧占非习惯性看牙就诊情况(如仅在疼痛时才就诊)的41%。牙医应能够识别因牙科恐惧而有不定期就诊风险的患者,并使用有效且可靠的工具来测量他们的恐惧,该工具应能捕捉牙科恐惧的多维度特征。本研究的目的是将牙科焦虑与恐惧指数(IDAF - 4C +)翻译成芬兰语,并测试其信效度。
研究对象为芬兰一所大学的牙科学生(n = 202)。IDAF - 4C由专家以及一位对原文不知情的英语母语翻译人员进行了双向翻译。使用克朗巴哈系数评估信度。使用斯皮尔曼相关系数,并通过探索性因素分析(EFA)以及使用曼 - 惠特尼U检验比较性别差异,来评估IDAF - 4C的效度,与改良牙科焦虑量表(MDAS)进行对比。
IDAF - 4C的信度良好,克朗巴哈系数为0.88。IDAF - 4C与MDAS及其子量表具有相关性,系数在0.34至0.85之间。与IDAF - 4C的情绪和生理成分的相关性更强。EFA揭示了一个因素,解释了51.7%的共同方差(特征值 = 4.6)。女性的平均得分往往略高于男性(1.49对1.36,p = 0.247)。
芬兰语版IDAF - 4C的翻译和本土化可被视为为该量表的效度和信度提供了一些证据。它补充了先前使用的测量方法,因为它还考虑了牙科恐惧中涉及的行为、认知和生理维度。