• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于脓毒症检测中自动序贯器官衰竭评估评分计算器的迭代用户界面设计

Iterative User Interface Design for Automated Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score Calculator in Sepsis Detection.

作者信息

Aakre Christopher Ansel, Kitson Jaben E, Li Man, Herasevich Vitaly

机构信息

Mayo Clinic, Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Rochester, MN, United States.

Mayo Clinic, Department of Information Technology, Rochester, MN, United States.

出版信息

JMIR Hum Factors. 2017 May 18;4(2):e14. doi: 10.2196/humanfactors.7567.

DOI:10.2196/humanfactors.7567
PMID:28526675
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5454218/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The new sepsis definition has increased the need for frequent sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score recalculation and the clerical burden of information retrieval makes this score ideal for automated calculation.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to (1) estimate the clerical workload of manual SOFA score calculation through a time-motion analysis and (2) describe a user-centered design process for an electronic medical record (EMR) integrated, automated SOFA score calculator with subsequent usability evaluation study.

METHODS

First, we performed a time-motion analysis by recording time-to-task-completion for the manual calculation of 35 baseline and 35 current SOFA scores by 14 internal medicine residents over a 2-month period. Next, we used an agile development process to create a user interface for a previously developed automated SOFA score calculator. The final user interface usability was evaluated by clinician end users with the Computer Systems Usability Questionnaire.

RESULTS

The overall mean (standard deviation, SD) time-to-complete manual SOFA score calculation time was 61.6 s (33). Among the 24% (12/50) usability survey respondents, our user-centered user interface design process resulted in >75% favorability of survey items in the domains of system usability, information quality, and interface quality.

CONCLUSIONS

Early stakeholder engagement in our agile design process resulted in a user interface for an automated SOFA score calculator that reduced clinician workload and met clinicians' needs at the point of care. Emerging interoperable platforms may facilitate dissemination of similarly useful clinical score calculators and decision support algorithms as "apps." A user-centered design process and usability evaluation should be considered during creation of these tools.

摘要

背景

新的脓毒症定义增加了频繁重新计算序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分的需求,而信息检索的文书工作负担使得该评分非常适合自动计算。

目的

本研究的目的是(1)通过时间动作分析估计手动计算SOFA评分的文书工作量,以及(2)描述一个以用户为中心的设计过程,用于开发一个集成在电子病历(EMR)中的自动SOFA评分计算器,并随后进行可用性评估研究。

方法

首先,我们进行了一项时间动作分析,记录了14名内科住院医师在2个月内手动计算35个基线SOFA评分和35个当前SOFA评分的任务完成时间。接下来,我们使用敏捷开发过程为之前开发的自动SOFA评分计算器创建了一个用户界面。最终的用户界面可用性由临床终端用户使用计算机系统可用性问卷进行评估。

结果

手动计算SOFA评分的总体平均(标准差,SD)完成时间为61.6秒(33)。在24%(12/50)的可用性调查受访者中,我们以用户为中心的用户界面设计过程在系统可用性、信息质量和界面质量领域的调查项目中获得了超过75%的好感度。

结论

早期利益相关者参与我们的敏捷设计过程,产生了一个自动SOFA评分计算器的用户界面,该界面减少了临床医生的工作量,并在护理点满足了临床医生的需求。新兴的可互操作平台可能有助于将类似有用的临床评分计算器和决策支持算法作为“应用程序”进行传播。在创建这些工具时应考虑以用户为中心的设计过程和可用性评估。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7a6/5454218/3d41c8662fe6/humanfactors_v4i2e14_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7a6/5454218/6a561e664b30/humanfactors_v4i2e14_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7a6/5454218/3d41c8662fe6/humanfactors_v4i2e14_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7a6/5454218/6a561e664b30/humanfactors_v4i2e14_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7a6/5454218/3d41c8662fe6/humanfactors_v4i2e14_fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
Iterative User Interface Design for Automated Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score Calculator in Sepsis Detection.用于脓毒症检测中自动序贯器官衰竭评估评分计算器的迭代用户界面设计
JMIR Hum Factors. 2017 May 18;4(2):e14. doi: 10.2196/humanfactors.7567.
2
Prospective validation of a near real-time EHR-integrated automated SOFA score calculator.近实时电子健康记录集成自动序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分计算器的前瞻性验证
Int J Med Inform. 2017 Jul;103:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.04.001. Epub 2017 Apr 3.
3
Human-Centered Design Study: Enhancing the Usability of a Mobile Phone App in an Integrated Falls Risk Detection System for Use by Older Adult Users.以人为本的设计研究:提升一款用于老年人的综合跌倒风险检测系统中手机应用程序的可用性。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017 May 30;5(5):e71. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.7046.
4
Evaluation of user interface and workflow design of a bedside nursing clinical decision support system.床边护理临床决策支持系统的用户界面与工作流程设计评估
Interact J Med Res. 2013 Jan 31;2(1):e4. doi: 10.2196/ijmr.2402.
5
Design of electronic medical record user interfaces: a matrix-based method for improving usability.电子病历用户界面设计:一种基于矩阵的提高可用性方法。
J Healthc Eng. 2013;4(3):427-52. doi: 10.1260/2040-2295.4.3.427.
6
A Digital Cognitive Aid for Anesthesia to Support Intraoperative Crisis Management: Results of the User-Centered Design Process.用于支持术中危机管理的麻醉数字认知辅助:以用户为中心的设计过程的结果。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Apr 29;7(4):e13226. doi: 10.2196/13226.
7
A User-Centered design and usability testing of a web-based medication reconciliation application integrated in an eHealth network.基于用户为中心的设计和基于网络的用药整合电子健康网络应用的可用性测试。
Int J Med Inform. 2019 Jun;126:138-146. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.03.013. Epub 2019 Apr 6.
8
Combined Expert and User-Driven Usability Assessment of Trauma Decision Support Systems Improves User-Centered Design.创伤决策支持系统的专家与用户联合驱动可用性评估改善了以用户为中心的设计。
Surgery. 2022 Nov;172(5):1537-1548. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2022.05.037. Epub 2022 Aug 26.
9
User-oriented evaluation of a medical image retrieval system for radiologists.面向放射科医生的医学图像检索系统的用户导向评估。
Int J Med Inform. 2015 Oct;84(10):774-83. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.04.003. Epub 2015 May 21.
10
Assessing the electronic Bedside Paediatric Early Warning System: A simulation study on decision-making and usability.评估电子床旁儿科早期预警系统:一项关于决策和可用性的模拟研究。
Int J Med Inform. 2020 Jan;133:103969. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.103969. Epub 2019 Sep 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Barriers and Facilitators of the Use of Computerized Critical Care Information Systems in the Intensive Care Unit: Qualitative Interview Study.重症监护病房中使用计算机化重症监护信息系统的障碍与促进因素:定性访谈研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Aug 22;27:e49254. doi: 10.2196/49254.
2
Information displays for automated surveillance algorithms of in-hospital patient deterioration: a scoping review.用于院内患者病情恶化的自动化监测算法的信息显示:范围综述。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2023 Dec 22;31(1):256-273. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocad203.
3
Involving Health Care Professionals in the Development of Electronic Health Records: Scoping Review.

本文引用的文献

1
Prognostic Accuracy of the SOFA Score, SIRS Criteria, and qSOFA Score for In-Hospital Mortality Among Adults With Suspected Infection Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit.SOFA 评分、SIRS 标准和 qSOFA 评分对 ICU 收治的疑似感染成人院内死亡率的预后准确性。
JAMA. 2017 Jan 17;317(3):290-300. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.20328.
2
The new sepsis consensus definitions: the good, the bad and the ugly.新的脓毒症共识定义:优点、缺点与不足。
Intensive Care Med. 2016 Dec;42(12):2024-2026. doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4604-0. Epub 2016 Nov 3.
3
The new sepsis consensus definitions (Sepsis-3): the good, the not-so-bad, and the actually-quite-pretty.
让医疗保健专业人员参与电子健康记录的开发:范围审查
JMIR Hum Factors. 2023 Jul 10;10:e45598. doi: 10.2196/45598.
4
Supporting Clinical Care: SOFA on FHIR.支持临床护理:基于FHIR的序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)
AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc. 2023 Jun 16;2023:234-243. eCollection 2023.
5
Computerized Clinical Decision Support Systems for the Early Detection of Sepsis Among Adult Inpatients: Scoping Review.计算机化临床决策支持系统用于早期检测成年住院患者脓毒症:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Feb 23;24(2):e31083. doi: 10.2196/31083.
6
Examining Challenges to the Incorporation of End Users in the Design of Digital Health Interventions: Protocol for a Systematic Review.审视数字健康干预设计中纳入终端用户所面临的挑战:一项系统评价方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 Jul 26;10(7):e28083. doi: 10.2196/28083.
7
Systematic review of applied usability metrics within usability evaluation methods for hospital electronic healthcare record systems: Metrics and Evaluation Methods for eHealth Systems.医院电子医疗记录系统的可用性评估方法中应用的可用性度量的系统评价:电子健康系统的度量和评估方法。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2021 Dec;27(6):1403-1416. doi: 10.1111/jep.13582. Epub 2021 May 13.
8
Unpacking Prevalence and Dichotomy in Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment and Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome Parameters: Observational Data-Driven Approach Backed by Sepsis Pathophysiology.剖析快速序贯器官衰竭评估和全身炎症反应综合征参数中的患病率及二分法:基于脓毒症病理生理学的观察性数据驱动方法
JMIR Med Inform. 2020 Dec 3;8(12):e18352. doi: 10.2196/18352.
9
Use and Evaluation of Computerized Clinical Decision Support Systems for Early Detection of Sepsis in Hospitals: Protocol for a Scoping Review.医院中用于早期检测脓毒症的计算机化临床决策支持系统的使用与评估:一项范围综述方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2020 Nov 20;9(11):e24899. doi: 10.2196/24899.
新的脓毒症共识定义(脓毒症-3):好的方面、不太坏的方面以及实际上相当不错的方面。
Intensive Care Med. 2016 Dec;42(12):2027-2029. doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4600-4. Epub 2016 Nov 3.
4
Managing Clinical Knowledge for Health Care Improvement.管理临床知识以改善医疗保健。
Yearb Med Inform. 2000(1):65-70.
5
Automated Detection of Sepsis Using Electronic Medical Record Data: A Systematic Review.利用电子病历数据自动检测脓毒症:一项系统综述。
J Healthc Qual. 2017 Nov/Dec;39(6):322-333. doi: 10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000066.
6
Automation bias and verification complexity: a systematic review.自动化偏差与验证复杂性:一项系统综述
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Mar 1;24(2):423-431. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocw105.
7
Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock.脓毒症和脓毒性休克的定义。
JAMA. 2016 Jul 26;316(4):457-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.6374.
8
Sepsis-3: What is the Meaning of a Definition?脓毒症-3:定义的意义是什么?
Crit Care Med. 2016 Aug;44(8):1459-60. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001983.
9
Integrating data from an online diabetes prevention program into an electronic health record and clinical workflow, a design phase usability study.将在线糖尿病预防项目的数据整合到电子健康记录和临床工作流程中的设计阶段可用性研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2016 Jul 11;16:88. doi: 10.1186/s12911-016-0328-x.
10
Relationship Between Clerical Burden and Characteristics of the Electronic Environment With Physician Burnout and Professional Satisfaction.文书工作负担与电子环境特征与医生倦怠和职业满意度的关系。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2016 Jul;91(7):836-48. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2016.05.007. Epub 2016 Jun 27.