• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

计算机化临床决策支持系统用于早期检测成年住院患者脓毒症:范围综述。

Computerized Clinical Decision Support Systems for the Early Detection of Sepsis Among Adult Inpatients: Scoping Review.

机构信息

Centre for Health Systems and Safety Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Australia.

Clinical Excellence Commission, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2022 Feb 23;24(2):e31083. doi: 10.2196/31083.

DOI:10.2196/31083
PMID:35195528
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8908200/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Sepsis is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Early detection of sepsis followed promptly by treatment initiation improves patient outcomes and saves lives. Hospitals are increasingly using computerized clinical decision support (CCDS) systems for the rapid identification of adult patients with sepsis.

OBJECTIVE

This scoping review aims to systematically describe studies reporting on the use and evaluation of CCDS systems for the early detection of adult inpatients with sepsis.

METHODS

The protocol for this scoping review was previously published. A total of 10 electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, the Cochrane database, LILACS [Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature], Scopus, Web of Science, OpenGrey, ClinicalTrials.gov, and PQDT [ProQuest Dissertations and Theses]) were comprehensively searched using terms for sepsis, CCDS, and detection to identify relevant studies. Title, abstract, and full-text screening were performed by 2 independent reviewers using predefined eligibility criteria. Data charting was performed by 1 reviewer with a second reviewer checking a random sample of studies. Any disagreements were discussed with input from a third reviewer. In this review, we present the results for adult inpatients, including studies that do not specify patient age.

RESULTS

A search of the electronic databases retrieved 12,139 studies following duplicate removal. We identified 124 studies for inclusion after title, abstract, full-text screening, and hand searching were complete. Nearly all studies (121/124, 97.6%) were published after 2009. Half of the studies were journal articles (65/124, 52.4%), and the remainder were conference abstracts (54/124, 43.5%) and theses (5/124, 4%). Most studies used a single cohort (54/124, 43.5%) or before-after (42/124, 33.9%) approach. Across all 124 included studies, patient outcomes were the most frequently reported outcomes (107/124, 86.3%), followed by sepsis treatment and management (75/124, 60.5%), CCDS usability (14/124, 11.3%), and cost outcomes (9/124, 7.3%). For sepsis identification, the systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria were the most commonly used, alone (50/124, 40.3%), combined with organ dysfunction (28/124, 22.6%), or combined with other criteria (23/124, 18.5%). Over half of the CCDS systems (68/124, 54.8%) were implemented alongside other sepsis-related interventions.

CONCLUSIONS

The current body of literature investigating the implementation of CCDS systems for the early detection of adult inpatients with sepsis is extremely diverse. There is substantial variability in study design, CCDS criteria and characteristics, and outcomes measured across the identified literature. Future research on CCDS system usability, cost, and impact on sepsis morbidity is needed.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.2196/24899.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b479/8908200/ab375bc8ac50/jmir_v24i2e31083_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b479/8908200/39f0c5090f93/jmir_v24i2e31083_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b479/8908200/9d5c22c5ea02/jmir_v24i2e31083_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b479/8908200/47615f987642/jmir_v24i2e31083_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b479/8908200/ab375bc8ac50/jmir_v24i2e31083_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b479/8908200/39f0c5090f93/jmir_v24i2e31083_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b479/8908200/9d5c22c5ea02/jmir_v24i2e31083_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b479/8908200/47615f987642/jmir_v24i2e31083_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b479/8908200/ab375bc8ac50/jmir_v24i2e31083_fig4.jpg
摘要

背景

败血症是全球发病率和死亡率的重要原因。及时发现败血症并迅速开始治疗可改善患者的预后并挽救生命。医院越来越多地使用计算机临床决策支持 (CCDS) 系统来快速识别成年败血症患者。

目的

本范围综述旨在系统地描述报告用于早期检测成年住院患者败血症的 CCDS 系统的使用和评估的研究。

方法

该范围综述的方案先前已发表。共综合检索了 10 个电子数据库(MEDLINE、Embase、CINAHL、Cochrane 数据库、LILACS[拉丁美洲和加勒比健康科学文献]、Scopus、Web of Science、OpenGrey、ClinicalTrials.gov 和 PQDT[ProQuest 学位论文和论文]),使用了败血症、CCDS 和检测的术语来确定相关研究。两名独立审查员使用预定义的纳入标准对标题、摘要和全文进行筛选。由一名评审员进行数据图表绘制,另一名评审员检查随机样本的研究。任何分歧都将在第三名评审员的参与下进行讨论。在本综述中,我们展示了针对成年住院患者的结果,包括未具体说明患者年龄的研究。

结果

重复删除后,电子数据库的检索共检索到 12,139 篇研究。在标题、摘要和全文筛选以及手工搜索完成后,我们确定了 124 项符合纳入标准的研究。几乎所有研究(121/124,97.6%)都是在 2009 年后发表的。半数研究为期刊文章(65/124,52.4%),其余为会议摘要(54/124,43.5%)和论文(5/124,4%)。大多数研究使用单一队列(54/124,43.5%)或前后(42/124,33.9%)方法。在所有 124 项纳入研究中,患者结局是最常报告的结局(107/124,86.3%),其次是败血症治疗和管理(75/124,60.5%)、CCDS 可用性(14/124,11.3%)和成本结果(9/124,7.3%)。在败血症识别方面,全身炎症反应综合征标准是最常用的,单独使用(50/124,40.3%),与器官功能障碍联合使用(28/124,22.6%)或与其他标准联合使用(23/124,18.5%)。超过一半的 CCDS 系统(68/124,54.8%)与其他败血症相关干预措施同时实施。

结论

目前研究使用 CCDS 系统早期检测成年败血症住院患者的文献非常多样化。在确定的文献中,研究设计、CCDS 标准和特征以及测量的结果存在很大差异。需要进一步研究 CCDS 系统的可用性、成本以及对败血症发病率的影响。

国际注册报告标识符(IRRID):RR2-10.2196/24899。

相似文献

1
Computerized Clinical Decision Support Systems for the Early Detection of Sepsis Among Adult Inpatients: Scoping Review.计算机化临床决策支持系统用于早期检测成年住院患者脓毒症:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Feb 23;24(2):e31083. doi: 10.2196/31083.
2
Computerized Clinical Decision Support Systems for the Early Detection of Sepsis Among Pediatric, Neonatal, and Maternal Inpatients: Scoping Review.用于儿科、新生儿和孕产妇住院患者脓毒症早期检测的计算机化临床决策支持系统:范围综述
JMIR Med Inform. 2022 May 6;10(5):e35061. doi: 10.2196/35061.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Use and Evaluation of Computerized Clinical Decision Support Systems for Early Detection of Sepsis in Hospitals: Protocol for a Scoping Review.医院中用于早期检测脓毒症的计算机化临床决策支持系统的使用与评估:一项范围综述方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2020 Nov 20;9(11):e24899. doi: 10.2196/24899.
5
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
6
Usability of Clinical Decision Support for Adult Sepsis Detection.成人脓毒症检测临床决策支持的可用性
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2024 Jan 25;310:1380-1381. doi: 10.3233/SHTI231204.
7
Clinical Decision-Support Systems for Detection of Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome, Sepsis, and Septic Shock in Critically Ill Patients: A Systematic Review.用于检测重症患者全身炎症反应综合征、脓毒症和脓毒性休克的临床决策支持系统:一项系统评价
Methods Inf Med. 2019 Dec;58(S 02):e43-e57. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1695717. Epub 2019 Sep 9.
8
Automated monitoring compared to standard care for the early detection of sepsis in critically ill patients.与标准护理相比,自动监测用于危重症患者脓毒症的早期检测
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 25;6(6):CD012404. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012404.pub2.
9
Health technologies for the prevention and detection of falls in adult hospital inpatients: a scoping review.成人住院患者跌倒预防和检测的健康技术:范围综述。
JBI Evid Synth. 2021 Oct;19(10):2478-2658. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-20-00114.
10
Enabling medication management through health information technology (Health IT).通过健康信息技术(Health IT)实现药物管理。
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2011 Apr(201):1-951.

引用本文的文献

1
[S3 guideline on sepsis-prevention, diagnosis, therapy, and follow-up care-update 2025].[S3 脓毒症预防、诊断、治疗及随访指南 - 2025年更新版]
Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2025 Aug 18. doi: 10.1007/s00063-025-01317-1.
2
Improving Prognostic Accuracy of MASCC Score with Lactate and CRP Measurements in Febrile Neutropenic Patients.通过测量发热性中性粒细胞减少患者的乳酸和CRP来提高MASCC评分的预后准确性
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Jul 31;15(15):1922. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15151922.
3
Evaluating the impact of common clinical confounders on performance of deep-learning-based sepsis risk assessment.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of an augmented emergency department electronic medical record-based sepsis alert.基于增强型急诊电子病历的脓毒症警报评估。
Emerg Med Australas. 2021 Oct;33(5):848-856. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.13748. Epub 2021 Feb 23.
2
Recommendations for the safe, effective use of adaptive CDS in the US healthcare system: an AMIA position paper.美国医疗保健系统中自适应 CDS 安全有效使用的建议:AMIA 立场文件。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Mar 18;28(4):677-684. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa319.
3
Use and Evaluation of Computerized Clinical Decision Support Systems for Early Detection of Sepsis in Hospitals: Protocol for a Scoping Review.
评估常见临床混杂因素对基于深度学习的脓毒症风险评估性能的影响。
Front Artif Intell. 2025 Jul 15;8:1452471. doi: 10.3389/frai.2025.1452471. eCollection 2025.
4
Beyond labels: determining the true type of blood gas samples in ICU patients through supervised machine learning.超越标签:通过监督式机器学习确定重症监护病房患者血气样本的真实类型
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025 Jul 24;25(1):275. doi: 10.1186/s12911-025-03115-3.
5
AI-driven multi-omics profiling of sepsis immunity in the digestive system.人工智能驱动的消化系统脓毒症免疫多组学分析
Front Immunol. 2025 May 20;16:1590526. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1590526. eCollection 2025.
6
Digital health technologies and innovation patterns in diabetes ecosystems.糖尿病生态系统中的数字健康技术与创新模式。
Digit Health. 2025 Feb 5;11:20552076241311740. doi: 10.1177/20552076241311740. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
7
AI-Driven Innovations for Early Sepsis Detection by Combining Predictive Accuracy With Blood Count Analysis in an Emergency Setting: Retrospective Study.通过在急诊环境中将预测准确性与血细胞计数分析相结合实现早期脓毒症检测的人工智能驱动创新:回顾性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jan 24;27:e56155. doi: 10.2196/56155.
8
Septic shock in the immunocompromised cancer patient: a narrative review.免疫功能低下的癌症患者的脓毒症性休克:叙述性综述。
Crit Care. 2024 Aug 30;28(1):285. doi: 10.1186/s13054-024-05073-0.
9
Applications of Clinical Decision Support Systems in Diabetes Care: Scoping Review.临床决策支持系统在糖尿病护理中的应用:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Dec 8;25:e51024. doi: 10.2196/51024.
10
Predicting Osteoarthritis of the Temporomandibular Joint Using Random Forest with Privileged Information.利用带有特权信息的随机森林预测颞下颌关节骨关节炎
Ethical Philos Issues Med Imaging Multimodal Learn Fusion Across Scales Clin Decis Support Topol Data Anal Biomed Imaging (2022). 2022 Sep;13755:77-86. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-23223-7_7. Epub 2022 Dec 20.
医院中用于早期检测脓毒症的计算机化临床决策支持系统的使用与评估:一项范围综述方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2020 Nov 20;9(11):e24899. doi: 10.2196/24899.
4
Modified early warning score-based clinical decision support: cost impact and clinical outcomes in sepsis.基于改良早期预警评分的临床决策支持:脓毒症的成本影响及临床结局
JAMIA Open. 2020 Apr 21;3(2):261-268. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaa014. eCollection 2020 Jul.
5
2019 John M. Eisenberg Patient Safety and Quality Awards: SPOTting Sepsis to Save Lives: A Nationwide Computer Algorithm for Early Detection of Sepsis: Innovation in Patient Safety and Quality at the National Level (Eisenberg Award).2019年约翰·M·艾森伯格患者安全与质量奖:识别脓毒症以挽救生命:一种用于脓毒症早期检测的全国性计算机算法:国家级患者安全与质量创新(艾森伯格奖)
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2020 Jul;46(7):381-391. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2020.04.006. Epub 2020 Apr 19.
6
Interventions for rapid recognition and treatment of sepsis in the emergency department: a narrative review.急诊科中脓毒症的快速识别和治疗干预措施:叙述性综述。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2021 Feb;27(2):192-203. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.02.022. Epub 2020 Feb 29.
7
An overview of clinical decision support systems: benefits, risks, and strategies for success.临床决策支持系统概述:益处、风险及成功策略。
NPJ Digit Med. 2020 Feb 6;3:17. doi: 10.1038/s41746-020-0221-y. eCollection 2020.
8
An investigation of sepsis surveillance and emergency treatment on patient mortality outcomes: An observational cohort study.脓毒症监测与急诊治疗对患者死亡率影响的调查:一项观察性队列研究。
JAMIA Open. 2018 May 15;1(1):107-114. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooy013. eCollection 2018 Jul.
9
Global, regional, and national sepsis incidence and mortality, 1990-2017: analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study.全球、地区和国家脓毒症发病率和死亡率,1990-2017 年:全球疾病负担研究分析。
Lancet. 2020 Jan 18;395(10219):200-211. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32989-7.
10
Comparison of the quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment and adult sepsis pathway in predicting adverse outcomes among adult patients in general wards: a retrospective observational cohort study.快速脓毒症相关器官衰竭评估与成人脓毒症通路在预测普通病房成年患者不良结局中的比较:一项回顾性观察队列研究。
Intern Med J. 2021 Feb;51(2):254-263. doi: 10.1111/imj.14746.