Tukana Andrew, Gummow B
Disipline of Veterinary Science, James Cook University, Townsville, 4811, QLD, Australia.
Animal Health and Production Thematic Team, Land Resources Division, The Pacific Community (SPC), 3 Luke Street, Nabua, Suva, Fiji Islands.
Trop Anim Health Prod. 2017 Aug;49(6):1171-1178. doi: 10.1007/s11250-017-1314-8. Epub 2017 May 20.
Little is published on risk factors associated with bovine brucellosis in Pacific island communities. The 2009 re-emergence of bovine brucellosis in Fiji enabled us to do an interview-based questionnaire survey of 81 farms in the Wainivesi locality of the Tailevu province on the main island of Fiji to investigate what risk factors could have played a role in the re-emergence of the disease. The survey was conducted on 68 farms that had no positive cases of bovine brucellosis and on 13 farms in the same area where cattle had returned a positive result to the Brucella Rose Bengal test. Descriptive statistical methods were used to describe the demographic data while univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression were used to evaluate the association between the selected risk factors and the presence of brucellosis on the farms at the time of the outbreak. The demographics of Fijian dairy farms are presented in the article and the biosecurity implications of those farming systems are discussed. Two risk factors were strongly associated with farms having brucellosis, and these were history of reactor cattle to brucellosis and or bovine tuberculosis on the farm (OR = 29, P ≤ 0.01) and farms that practised sharing of water sources for cattle within and with outside farms (OR = 39, P ≤ 0.01). Possible reasons why these were risk factors are also discussed. The potential risks for human health was also high as the use of personal protective equipment was low (15%). A high proportion of farmers (62%) could not recognise brucellosis thus contributing to the low frequency of disease reports (44%) made. The article also highlights other important risk factors which could be attributed to farming practices in the region and which could contribute to public health risks and the re-emergence of diseases.
关于太平洋岛屿社区中与牛布鲁氏菌病相关的风险因素,发表的研究很少。2009年斐济牛布鲁氏菌病再次出现,这使我们能够对斐济主岛泰莱武省瓦尼维西地区的81个农场进行基于访谈的问卷调查,以调查哪些风险因素可能在该病的再次出现中发挥了作用。该调查在68个没有牛布鲁氏菌病阳性病例的农场以及同一地区13个牛对布鲁氏菌虎红试验呈阳性结果的农场进行。描述性统计方法用于描述人口统计数据,单变量分析和多变量逻辑回归用于评估所选风险因素与疫情爆发时农场布鲁氏菌病存在之间的关联。本文介绍了斐济奶牛场的人口统计数据,并讨论了这些养殖系统的生物安全影响。有两个风险因素与发生布鲁氏菌病的农场密切相关,即农场有布鲁氏菌病反应牛和/或牛结核病的病史(比值比=29,P≤0.01),以及在农场内部和与外部农场之间实行牛水源共享的农场(比值比=39,P≤0.01)。还讨论了这些成为风险因素的可能原因。由于个人防护设备的使用率较低(15%),对人类健康的潜在风险也很高。很大比例的农民(62%)无法识别布鲁氏菌病,因此导致疾病报告频率较低(44%)。本文还强调了其他重要的风险因素,这些因素可能归因于该地区的养殖方式,并且可能导致公共卫生风险和疾病再次出现。