Cárdenas Liliana, Peña Mario, Melo Oscar, Casal Jordi
Animal Medicine and Health Department, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Campus of The Autonomous University of Barcelona (UAB), 08193 Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain.
The Centre for Research into Animal Health (CReSA), Campus of The Autonomous University of Barcelona (UAB), 08193 Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain.
BMC Vet Res. 2019 Mar 7;15(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s12917-019-1825-9.
Bovine brucellosis is a zoonotic disease that causes substantial economic losses and has a strong impact on public health. The main objective of this paper is to determine the risk factors for new infections of Brucella abortus on Colombian cattle farms previously certified as being free of brucellosis. A case-control study was conducted by comparing 98 cases (farms certified as brucellosis-free for three or more years but became infected) with 93 controls (farms that remained brucellosis-free during at least the previous three years). The farms were matched by herd size and geographical location (municipality). Information was obtained via a questionnaire completed by veterinary officers through a personal interview with the herd owners.
Two-thirds of the herds (67%) were dairy herds, 16% were beef herds, and 17% were dual-purpose (beef and milk) herds. After exploratory univariate analysis, all explanatory variables with a p-value of ≤0.20 were included in a logistic regression model using the forward stepwise method to select the model with the best goodness of fit. The significant risk factors were the replacement of animals from farms not certified as brucellosis-free compared to replacement from certified brucellosis-free farms (OR = 4.84, p-value < 0.001) and beef cattle farms compared to dairy cattle farms (OR = 3.61, p-value = 0.017). When herds with and without artificial insemination were compared, it was observed that farms that used natural breeding with bulls from non-certified herds had a higher risk than farms using artificial insemination (OR = 2.45, p-value = 0.037), but when the bulls came from brucellosis-free farms, farms with natural breeding were less affected (OR = 0.30, p-value = 0.004) than farms using artificial insemination, whether with frozen semen from certified brucellosis-free herds or fresh semen from uncontrolled herds. The latter is commonly sold to neighbouring farms.
The government should make efforts to inform farmers about the risks involved in the introduction of semen and replacement heifers from farms that are not certified as brucellosis-free and to establish measures to control these practices.
牛布鲁氏菌病是一种人畜共患疾病,会造成重大经济损失,并对公共卫生产生严重影响。本文的主要目的是确定哥伦比亚此前被认证为无布鲁氏菌病的养牛场中感染流产布鲁氏菌的新风险因素。通过比较98例病例(被认证为无布鲁氏菌病三年或更长时间但后来感染的养殖场)和93例对照(至少在过去三年中一直无布鲁氏菌病的养殖场)进行了一项病例对照研究。养殖场按畜群规模和地理位置(市)进行匹配。信息通过兽医官员与畜群所有者进行个人访谈后填写的问卷获得。
三分之二的畜群(67%)是奶牛场,16%是肉牛场,17%是两用(肉牛和奶牛)场。经过探索性单变量分析后,所有p值≤0.20的解释变量都被纳入逻辑回归模型,采用向前逐步法选择拟合优度最佳的模型。显著的风险因素包括:与从被认证为无布鲁氏菌病的养殖场引进动物相比,从不被认证为无布鲁氏菌病的养殖场引进动物(比值比=4.84,p值<0.001);与奶牛场相比,肉牛场(比值比=3.61,p值=0.017)。比较有人工授精和无人授精的畜群时发现,使用来自未认证畜群的公牛进行自然配种的养殖场比使用人工授精的养殖场风险更高(比值比=2.45,p值=0.037),但当公牛来自无布鲁氏菌病的养殖场时,进行自然配种的养殖场受影响程度低于使用人工授精的养殖场(比值比=0.30,p值=0.004),无论人工授精使用的是来自被认证为无布鲁氏菌病畜群的冷冻精液还是来自未管控畜群的新鲜精液。后者通常出售给邻近养殖场。
政府应努力告知农民从不被认证为无布鲁氏菌病的养殖场引进精液和后备小母牛所涉及的风险,并制定措施控制这些行为。