Wall Kylie J, Cumming Toby B, Copland David A
Centre for Clinical Research, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
The Florey Institute for Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Front Neurol. 2017 May 5;8:149. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2017.00149. eCollection 2017.
Individuals with aphasia are often excluded from studies exploring poststroke cognition because so many of the standard cognitive assessments rely on language ability. Our primary objective was to examine the association between performance on cognitive tests and performance on comprehension and naming tests in poststroke aphasia. Second, we aimed to determine the association between language performance and a real-life measure of cognition (Kettle Test). Third, we explored the feasibility of administering cognitive tests in aphasia.
Thirty-six participants with poststroke aphasia and 32 controls were assessed on a battery of pen-and-paper cognitive tests recommended in stroke. Auditory comprehension was measured using the Comprehensive Aphasia Test and naming was measured using the Boston Naming Test. Twenty-two community dwelling participants with aphasia and controls were also asked to complete the Kettle Test. Multiple linear regressions were used to explore the relationship between language performance and performance on the cognitive tests. Feasibility was determined by quantifying missing data.
The cognitive tests with the highest variance accounted for by auditory comprehension and naming were animal fluency ( = 0.67, = 0.78) and the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (recognition discrimination index) ( = 0.65, = 0.78). All cognitive tests were significantly associated with auditory comprehension and naming, except for the Star Cancellation Test and the Kettle Test. Thirty-three percent of participants with aphasia were unable to complete all the cognitive tests.
Language and non-linguistic cognitive processes are often interrelated. Most pen-and-paper cognitive tests were significantly associated with both auditory comprehension and naming, even in tests that do not require a verbal response. Language performance was not significantly associated with a real-life cognitive performance measure. Task instructions, stimuli, and responses for completion need to be tailored for individuals with aphasia to minimize the influence of language deficits when testing non-linguistic cognitive performance.
失语症患者常常被排除在探索中风后认知的研究之外,因为许多标准认知评估依赖语言能力。我们的主要目标是研究中风后失语症患者认知测试表现与理解和命名测试表现之间的关联。其次,我们旨在确定语言表现与认知的现实生活测量指标(水壶测试)之间的关联。第三,我们探讨了对失语症患者进行认知测试的可行性。
对36名中风后失语症患者和32名对照者进行了一系列中风推荐的纸笔认知测试。使用综合失语症测试测量听觉理解能力,使用波士顿命名测试测量命名能力。还要求22名社区居住的失语症患者和对照者完成水壶测试。使用多元线性回归来探索语言表现与认知测试表现之间的关系。通过量化缺失数据来确定可行性。
听觉理解和命名解释方差最高的认知测试是动物流畅性测试( = 0.67, = 0.78)和霍普金斯言语学习测试(识别辨别指数)( = 0.65, = 0.78)。除星形删除测试和水壶测试外,所有认知测试均与听觉理解和命名显著相关。33%的失语症患者无法完成所有认知测试。
语言和非语言认知过程通常相互关联。即使在不需要言语反应的测试中,大多数纸笔认知测试也与听觉理解和命名显著相关。语言表现与认知的现实生活表现测量指标无显著关联。在测试非语言认知表现时,需要为失语症患者量身定制任务说明、刺激和完成反应,以尽量减少语言缺陷的影响。