Physical Therapy Department, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA, US.
Division of Biokinesiology & Physical Therapy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, US.
Int Biomech. 2024 Dec;11(1):1-8. doi: 10.1080/23335432.2024.2332212. Epub 2024 Mar 19.
Altered scapular kinematics is associated with shoulder pain. Resistance exercise is a common treatment; however, the effects of lifting an external load on scapular kinematics is limited. Understanding whether an external handheld load affects scapular kinematics in a healthy population can provide normal values utilized for comparison to individuals with shoulder pain. Currently, no studies have examined the effect of incrementally increased handheld loads. We defined the effects of varying external handheld loads on scapular kinematics during a shoulder elevation task. Healthy participants ( = 50) elevated their shoulder in the scapular plane over 4 trials. One trial of no loading (control) and 3 trials with incrementally increased external handheld loads. Scapular kinematic rotations and translations were measured during ascent and descent phases using 3D motion capture. Compared to no load, the highest external load during ascent increased scapular elevation [mean difference = 3.2 degrees (95%CI: 0.9, 5.4), = 0.006], and during descent increased scapular elevation [mean difference = 3.9 degrees (95%CI: 2.8, 5.1), < 0.001] and increased [mean difference = 4.5 degrees (95%CI: 2.4, 6.6), < 0.001]. External handheld loads result in small . These results should be utilized as normal values to compare to individuals with shoulder pain.
肩胛骨运动学改变与肩部疼痛有关。阻力运动是一种常见的治疗方法;然而,举起外部负荷对肩胛骨运动学的影响是有限的。了解外部手持负荷是否会影响健康人群的肩胛骨运动学,可以提供用于与肩部疼痛患者进行比较的正常值。目前,还没有研究检查递增外部手持负荷的影响。我们定义了在肩抬高任务中,不同外部手持负荷对肩胛骨运动学的影响。健康参与者(n=50)在 4 次试验中在肩胛骨平面上抬高肩部。一次无负荷(对照)试验和 3 次递增外部手持负荷试验。使用 3D 运动捕捉在上升和下降阶段测量肩胛骨运动学的旋转和平移。与无负荷相比,上升过程中最高外部负荷增加了肩胛骨抬高[平均差异=3.2 度(95%置信区间:0.9, 5.4),p=0.006],下降过程中增加了肩胛骨抬高[平均差异=3.9 度(95%置信区间:2.8, 5.1),p<0.001]和增加了[平均差异=4.5 度(95%置信区间:2.4, 6.6),p<0.001]。外部手持负荷导致较小的[平均差异=3.0 度(95%置信区间:0.7, 5.3),p=0.007]。这些结果应作为正常值与肩部疼痛患者进行比较。