Wilder David, Cross Peter, Chen Jiming, Gurland Barry, Lantigua Rafael A, Teresi Jeanne, Bolivar Mabel, Encarnacion Priscilla
Columbia University, Center for Geriatrics.
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 1995;3(2):96-107. doi: 10.1097/00019442-199500320-00002. Epub 2012 Aug 8.
Operating characteristics of seven screens for dementia were compared across various groups for 795 persons who had received a criterion diagnostic evaluation. Area under the curve (AUC), based on receiver operating characteristics, was compared between and within scales as an indication of their efficiency. Differences in AUC were only 5% across all the scales for the entire sample, but increased to 11% across sociocultural groups and scales and to 20% across education groups and scales. Two scales (the Mini-Mental State Exam and the Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire) misclassified most nondementias for the entire sample, and all scales misclassified most nondementias among persons with less than 5 years of education. Findings could support a recommendation that certain shorter scales be used because they perform as well as longer ones, are more consistent across cultural and educational groups, and can be more easily modified to improve performance in culturally diverse populations.
对795名接受了标准诊断评估的人员,在不同组中比较了七种痴呆筛查量表的操作特征。基于受试者操作特征曲线下面积(AUC),在各量表之间及量表内部进行比较,以此作为其效率的指标。整个样本中所有量表的AUC差异仅为5%,但在社会文化组和量表之间差异增至11%,在教育组和量表之间差异增至20%。两种量表(简易精神状态检查表和简短便携式精神状态问卷)对整个样本中的大多数非痴呆患者进行了错误分类,并且所有量表对受教育年限少于5年的人群中的大多数非痴呆患者都进行了错误分类。研究结果可能支持这样一项建议,即使用某些较短的量表,因为它们的表现与较长的量表一样好,在文化和教育组中更具一致性,并且可以更轻松地进行修改以提高在文化多元人群中的表现。