Klement Rainer J, Sweeney Reinhart A
Department of Radiation Oncology, Leopoldina Hospital, Schweinfurt, Germany.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Leopoldina Hospital, Schweinfurt, Germany.
Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2016 Apr;12:e1-e6. doi: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2015.11.001. Epub 2016 Jan 15.
BACKGROUND: We have found that a ketogenic diet (KD) during the course of radiotherapy (RT) was feasible and led to a preservation or favorable changes of body composition. Based on these observations and theoretical considerations, we initiated a study to investigate the impact of a KD or a ketogenic breakfast intervention in patients undergoing RT. METHODS: All patients presenting for curative RT with age between 18 and 75, body mass index between 18 and 34 kg/m and a histologically confirmed cancer of the breast, colorectum or head and neck region are considered for inclusion. Exclusion criteria are Karnofsky index <70, pregnancy, metallic body parts that interfere with bioimpedance analysis (BIA), type I diabetes, known enzyme defects that contradict a KD and renal insufficiency. Randomization is achieved by all consecutive patients first entering the control group and then an intervention group 1 until both groups contain 15 breast, 15 colorectal and 5 head and neck cancer patients. Intervention group 1 will receive each radiotherapy fraction after an overnight fast and subsequently ingest a ketogenic breakfast consisting of (i) 50-250 ml of a medium-chain triglyceride drink (betaquick, vitaflo, Bad Homburg, Germany) plus (ii) 5-15 g amino acids (MAP, dr. reinwald healthcare gmbh+co kg, Schwarzenbruck, Germany). If willing to undertake a complete KD for the duration of RT, patients are entered into intervention group 2. Intervention group 2 does not have to fast prior to RT fractions but will be supplemented with MAP analogous to intervention group 1. The control group will not receive dietary advice to follow a KD or reduce carbohydrate intake. The objective is twofold: (i) to test whether the ketogenic interventions are feasibly, as measured by the number of dropouts; (ii) to see whether intervention groups 1 and 2 attain a better preservation of BIA phase angle than the control group. ENDPOINTS: Primary endpoints are the feasibility of the interventions (measured through dropout rates), and changes in body weight and composition (measured through BIA). Secondary endpoints are changes in quality of life (EORTC questionnaires) and blood parameters as well as the occurrence and grade of toxicities and grade of regression after surgery in case of colorectal carcinomas.
背景:我们发现放疗(RT)期间采用生酮饮食(KD)是可行的,并且能使身体成分得以保持或发生有利变化。基于这些观察结果和理论思考,我们开展了一项研究,以调查KD或生酮早餐干预对接受放疗患者的影响。 方法:所有年龄在18至75岁之间、体重指数在18至34kg/m²之间、组织学确诊为乳腺癌、结直肠癌或头颈部癌且前来接受根治性放疗的患者均被考虑纳入。排除标准包括卡氏评分<70、妊娠、存在干扰生物电阻抗分析(BIA)的金属身体部位、I型糖尿病、已知的与KD相矛盾的酶缺陷以及肾功能不全。所有连续患者首先进入对照组,然后进入干预组1,直至两组均包含15例乳腺癌、15例结直肠癌和5例头颈部癌患者,以此实现随机分组。干预组1在空腹过夜后接受每次放疗,随后摄入一份生酮早餐,该早餐包括:(i)50 - 250毫升中链甘油三酯饮品(betaquick,vitaflo,德国巴特洪堡)加(ii)5 - 15克氨基酸(MAP,dr. reinwald healthcare gmbh+co kg,德国施瓦岑布鲁克)。如果患者愿意在放疗期间全程采用完整的KD,则进入干预组2。干预组2在放疗前无需空腹,但将与干预组1类似地补充MAP。对照组不会收到遵循KD或减少碳水化合物摄入的饮食建议。目的有两个:(i)通过失访人数来测试生酮干预是否可行;(ii)观察干预组1和2的BIA相角保存情况是否优于对照组。 终点指标:主要终点指标是干预措施的可行性(通过失访率衡量)以及体重和身体成分的变化(通过BIA测量)。次要终点指标包括生活质量的变化(欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织问卷)、血液参数、毒性反应的发生情况和分级,以及结直肠癌患者术后的消退分级。
J Int Soc Sports Nutr. 2018-7-9
Int J Mol Sci. 2023-2-12
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2022-8
Front Nutr. 2021-11-25