Rocco Priscila T P, Bensenor Isabela M, Griep Rosane H, Moreno Arlinda B, Alencar Airlane P, Lotufo Paulo A, Santos Itamar S
Departamento de Clínica Médica, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil; Centro de Pesquisa Clínica e Epidemiológica, Hospital Universitário, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Laboratório de Educação em Ambiente e Saúde, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Am J Cardiol. 2017 Jul 15;120(2):207-212. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.04.008. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
We aimed to study the association between the American Heart Association cardiovascular health (CVH) score and job strain in the Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Adult Health baseline. We analyzed data from 11,351 active workers (aged 35 to 74 years) without overt cardiovascular disease and who had complete data. Job strain was assessed using the 17-item Brazilian version of the Swedish Job Demand-Control-Support Questionnaire. Clinical (fasting plasma glucose, total cholesterol, and blood pressure) and lifestyle (diet, physical activity, smoking, and body mass index) components of CVH score were assessed according to the American Heart Association criteria. We used quasi-Poisson and multinomial regression models, adjusted for age, gender, race, educational level and income, and positive relative predicted score differences (rPSDs) indicate greater predicted scores. Subjects with low skill discretion scores had lower global (rPSD: -1.8%; p = 0.021) and lifestyle (rPSD: -3.6%; p = 0.018) CVH scores. Participants with low decision authority (rPSD: -2.4%; p = 0.029) and low social support scores (rPSD: -3.3%; p = 0.001) also had lower lifestyle CVH scores. In conclusion, we found significant associations between job strain and CVH scores in this large multicenter sample.
在巴西成人健康纵向研究基线中,我们旨在研究美国心脏协会心血管健康(CVH)评分与工作压力之间的关联。我们分析了11351名无明显心血管疾病且数据完整的在职员工(年龄在35至74岁之间)的数据。使用瑞典工作需求 - 控制 - 支持问卷的17项巴西版本评估工作压力。根据美国心脏协会标准评估CVH评分的临床(空腹血糖、总胆固醇和血压)和生活方式(饮食、身体活动、吸烟和体重指数)组成部分。我们使用了准泊松回归模型和多项回归模型,并对年龄、性别、种族、教育水平和收入进行了调整,正向相对预测得分差异(rPSD)表明预测得分更高。技能裁量得分低的受试者的总体CVH评分(rPSD:-1.8%;p = 0.021)和生活方式CVH评分(rPSD:-3.6%;p = 0.018)较低。决策自主权低(rPSD:-2.4%;p = 0.029)和社会支持得分低(rPSD:-3.3%;p = 0.001)的参与者的生活方式CVH评分也较低。总之,在这个大型多中心样本中,我们发现工作压力与CVH评分之间存在显著关联。