• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

飞秒激光辅助白内障手术囊切开术与手动囊切开术边缘强度的眼内比较。

Intereye comparison of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery capsulotomy and manual capsulorhexis edge strength.

机构信息

From Personaleyes (Chan, Pattamatta, Meades), Department of Biomedical Engineering (Butlin), and Department of Ophthalmology (Bala), Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.

From Personaleyes (Chan, Pattamatta, Meades), Department of Biomedical Engineering (Butlin), and Department of Ophthalmology (Bala), Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017 Apr;43(4):480-485. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.12.033.

DOI:10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.12.033
PMID:28532932
Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the breaking force required to tear the explanted capsule after femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery in the worse eye and manual cataract surgery in the contralateral eye.

SETTING

Personaleyes, Sydney, Australia.

DESIGN

Prospective nonrandomized case study.

METHOD

Patients with bilateral cataract had femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery with the Lensx laser in the eye with worse vision and manual cataract surgery in the contralateral eye. Each explanted capsule was stretched mechanically, and the breaking force and strain in grams (g) were compared. When a large contralateral difference in capsule strength was found, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was applied to determine whether morphologic imperfections were present in a case with a weak capsule.

RESULTS

Paired samples of 78 eyes of 39 patients were tested. The mean breaking force was not significantly different between manual capsulorhexes (2.3 g ± 2.0 [SD]) and femtosecond laser capsulotomies (2.0 ± 2.2 g, P = .52). The breaking strain for the manual samples (33.8% ± 18.3%) and for the femtosecond laser samples (34.6% ± 18.6%) were also not significantly different (P = .81). In 5 patients, in the femtosecond group, the capsules required considerably less force to break than the capsules in the manual group. However, the SEM images of these samples did not show specific laser imperfections.

CONCLUSION

In paired human eyes, the capsulotomies created by a femtosecond laser with a contact lens interface were as strong as manual capsulorhexes.

摘要

目的

比较在较差眼行飞秒激光辅助白内障手术后和在对侧眼行手动白内障手术后撕除囊袋所需的撕裂力。

设置

澳大利亚悉尼 Personaleyes。

设计

前瞻性非随机病例研究。

方法

双眼白内障患者在较差眼行 Lensx 激光飞秒激光辅助白内障手术,在对侧眼行手动白内障手术。每个取出的囊袋都进行机械拉伸,比较撕裂力和克数(g)的应变。当发现囊袋强度的显著差异时,应用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)确定在囊袋较弱的情况下是否存在形态缺陷。

结果

对 39 例患者的 78 只眼进行了配对样本测试。手动撕囊(2.3±2.0 g,SD)和飞秒激光囊切开术(2.0±2.2 g,P=.52)的平均撕裂力无显著差异。手动样本(33.8%±18.3%)和飞秒激光样本(34.6%±18.6%)的撕裂应变也无显著差异(P=.81)。在 5 例患者中,飞秒激光组的囊袋所需的撕裂力明显小于手动组。然而,这些样本的 SEM 图像并未显示出特定的激光缺陷。

结论

在配对的人眼中,带有接触镜界面的飞秒激光产生的囊切开术与手动撕囊一样坚固。

相似文献

1
Intereye comparison of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery capsulotomy and manual capsulorhexis edge strength.飞秒激光辅助白内障手术囊切开术与手动囊切开术边缘强度的眼内比较。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017 Apr;43(4):480-485. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.12.033.
2
[Preliminary report on the application of femtosecond laser-assisted anterior capsulotomy in intumescent white cataract surgery].飞秒激光辅助前囊切开术在膨胀期白色白内障手术中的应用初步报告
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2017 Apr 11;53(4):281-287. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0412-4081.2017.04.010.
3
Scanning electron microscopy evaluation of capsulorhexis in femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery.飞秒激光辅助白内障手术中囊膜切开的扫描电子显微镜评估。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013 Oct;39(10):1581-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.06.016.
4
Comparison of anterior capsulotomy techniques: continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis, femtosecond laser-assisted capsulotomy and selective laser capsulotomy.前囊膜切开技术比较:连续曲线囊膜切开术、飞秒激光辅助囊膜切开术和选择性激光囊膜切开术。
Br J Ophthalmol. 2020 Mar;104(3):437-442. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2018-313421. Epub 2019 Apr 4.
5
Comparison of Manual, Femtosecond Laser, and Precision Pulse Capsulotomy Edge Tear Strength in Paired Human Cadaver Eyes.人尸体眼球对比较手动、飞秒激光和精密脉冲囊切开术边缘撕裂强度。
Ophthalmology. 2016 Feb;123(2):265-274. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.10.019. Epub 2015 Dec 23.
6
Light microscopy and scanning electron microscopy analysis of rigid curved interface femtosecond laser-assisted and manual anterior capsulotomy.刚性曲边界面飞秒激光辅助与手动前囊切开术的光学显微镜和扫描电子显微镜分析。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013 Oct;39(10):1587-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.07.024.
7
Optical coherence tomography and 3-dimensional confocal structured imaging system-guided femtosecond laser capsulotomy versus manual continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis.光学相干断层扫描和三维共聚焦结构成像系统引导的飞秒激光晶状体囊切开术与手动连续环形撕囊术的比较
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014 Dec;40(12):2035-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.05.032. Epub 2014 Oct 23.
8
Comparison of the anterior capsulotomy edge created by manual capsulorhexis and 2 femtosecond laser platforms: Scanning electron microscopy study.手工撕囊术与两种飞秒激光平台所形成的前囊切开边缘的比较:扫描电子显微镜研究
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014 Dec;40(12):2106-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.10.001. Epub 2014 Oct 18.
9
Lens capsule-related complications of femtosecond laser-assisted capsulotomy versus manual capsulorhexis for white cataracts.飞秒激光辅助撕囊与手法撕囊治疗白内障晶状体囊膜相关并发症的比较。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2019 Mar;45(3):337-342. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.10.037. Epub 2019 Jan 29.
10
[Comparative analysis of the clinical application of two femtosecond laser-assisted cataract operation platforms].[两种飞秒激光辅助白内障手术平台临床应用的比较分析]
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Jul 11;56(7):530-535. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112142-20191113-00571.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical outcomes of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery versus conventional phacoemulsification: A retrospective study in a tertiary eye care center in South India.印度南部一家三级眼科中心的回顾性研究:飞秒激光辅助白内障手术与传统超声乳化白内障吸除术的临床疗效比较。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2022 Dec;70(12):4300-4305. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_802_22.
2
The Latest Evidence with Regards to Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Cataract Surgery and Its Use Post 2020.关于飞秒激光辅助白内障手术及其2020年后应用的最新证据。
Clin Ophthalmol. 2021 Mar 30;15:1357-1363. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S306550. eCollection 2021.
3
Performance of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery in Chinese patients with cataract: a prospective, multicenter, registry study.
飞秒激光辅助白内障手术在中国白内障患者中的疗效:一项前瞻性、多中心登记研究。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2019 Mar 14;19(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s12886-019-1079-0.
4
[Precision pulse capsulotomy : The new capsulorhexis?].[精准脉冲晶状体囊切开术:新型撕囊术?]
Ophthalmologe. 2019 Mar;116(3):288-290. doi: 10.1007/s00347-018-0807-9.
5
Comparison of diathermic high-frequency capsulorhexis and continuous curvilinear capsulorrhexis in white cataract surgery.白色白内障手术中透热高频撕囊与连续环形撕囊的比较。
Int J Ophthalmol. 2018 Aug 18;11(8):1317-1321. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2018.08.11. eCollection 2018.
6
Anterior Capsule of the Lens: Comparison of Morphological Properties and Apoptosis Induction following FLACS and Standard Phacoemulsification Surgery.晶状体前囊:FLACS 和标准超声乳化术后形态学特性和细胞凋亡诱导的比较。
Biomed Res Int. 2018 Jan 11;2018:7242837. doi: 10.1155/2018/7242837. eCollection 2018.