Suppr超能文献

曲马多与布比卡因局部浸润用于剖宫产术后疼痛控制的双盲随机研究

Local Infiltration of Tramadol versus Bupivacaine for Post Cesarean Section Pain Control: A Double-Blind Randomized Study.

作者信息

Sahmeddini Mohammad Ali, Azemati Simin, Motlagh Ehsan Masoudi

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Shiraz Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.

出版信息

Iran J Med Sci. 2017 May;42(3):235-241.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Postoperative pain control after cesarean section (C/S) is important because inadequate postoperative pain control can result in a prolonged hospital stay. In this study, we compared postoperative somatic wound pain control between patients receiving tramadol and bupivacaine, infiltrated at the wound site.

METHODS

In this randomized clinical trial, 98 patients, eligible for elective C/S under general anesthesia, were randomly allocated to 2 groups. Before wound closure, 20 cc of 0.025% bupivacaine and 2 mg/kg of tramadol, diluted to 20 cc, were infiltrated at the wound site in groups A and B, respectively. After surgery, the pain score was measured using the visual analogue scale (VAS). Additionally, 24-hour total morphine consumption, nausea and vomiting, and respiratory depression were compared after 2, 4, 8, 16, and 24 hours between the 2 groups. The data were analyzed using SPSS with the Student independent test, χ test, Fisher exact test, and repeated measure test.

RESULTS

Postoperatively, there was no significant difference between these 2 groups in their VAS scores until 16 hours (P>0.05). However, at the 16 and 24 hours, the mean VAS scores were 3.20±2.24 and 2.51±2.55 in the bupivacaine group and 2.51±0.99 and 1.40±0.88 in the tramadol group, respectively (P<0.05). There was no difference in nausea and vomiting during the 24-hour period between the 2 groups. Also, no respiratory depression was detected in the both groups.

CONCLUSION

Local infiltration of tramadol (2 mg/kg) at the incision site of C/S was effective in somatic wound pain relief without significant complications.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

IRCT2013070111662N2.

摘要

背景

剖宫产术后的疼痛控制至关重要,因为术后疼痛控制不佳可能导致住院时间延长。在本研究中,我们比较了在伤口部位注射曲马多和布比卡因的患者术后躯体伤口疼痛的控制情况。

方法

在这项随机临床试验中,98例符合全身麻醉下择期剖宫产条件的患者被随机分为两组。在伤口缝合前,A组和B组分别在伤口部位注射20毫升0.025%布比卡因和2毫克/千克曲马多(稀释至20毫升)。术后,使用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)测量疼痛评分。此外,比较两组在术后2、4、8、16和24小时的24小时吗啡总消耗量、恶心呕吐情况及呼吸抑制情况。数据采用SPSS软件进行分析,使用学生独立样本t检验、χ检验、Fisher精确检验和重复测量检验。

结果

术后,两组在16小时内的VAS评分无显著差异(P>0.05)。然而,在16小时和24小时时,布比卡因组的平均VAS评分分别为3.20±2.24和2.51±2.55,曲马多组分别为2.51±0.99和1.40±0.88(P<0.05)。两组在24小时内的恶心呕吐情况无差异。此外,两组均未检测到呼吸抑制。

结论

剖宫产切口部位局部注射曲马多(2毫克/千克)对缓解躯体伤口疼痛有效且无明显并发症。

试验注册号

IRCT2013070111662N2。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e44e/5429491/6494a3658da4/IJMS-42-235-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验