• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

BRAF 突变型黑色素瘤的基因表达谱分析显示,vemurafenib 治疗预后不良的患者亚群可通过 cobimetinib 联合 vemurafenib 克服。

Gene Expression Profiling in -Mutated Melanoma Reveals Patient Subgroups with Poor Outcomes to Vemurafenib That May Be Overcome by Cobimetinib Plus Vemurafenib.

机构信息

Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California.

Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, and University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Sep 1;23(17):5238-5245. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-0172. Epub 2017 May 23.

DOI:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-0172
PMID:28536307
Abstract

The association of tumor gene expression profiles with progression-free survival (PFS) outcomes in patients with -mutated melanoma treated with vemurafenib or cobimetinib combined with vemurafenib was evaluated. Gene expression of archival tumor samples from patients in four trials (BRIM-2, BRIM-3, BRIM-7, and coBRIM) was evaluated. Genes significantly associated with PFS ( < 0.05) were identified by univariate Cox proportional hazards modeling, then subjected to unsupervised hierarchical clustering, principal component analysis, and recursive partitioning to develop optimized gene signatures. Forty-six genes were identified as significantly associated with PFS in both BRIM-2 ( = 63) and the vemurafenib arm of BRIM-3 ( = 160). Two distinct signatures were identified: cell cycle and immune. Among vemurafenib-treated patients, the cell-cycle signature was associated with shortened PFS compared with the immune signature in the BRIM-2/BRIM-3 training set [hazard ratio (HR) 1.8; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.3-2.6, = 0.0001] and in the coBRIM validation set ( = 101; HR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.0-2.5; = 0.08). The adverse impact of the cell-cycle signature on PFS was not observed in patients treated with cobimetinib combined with vemurafenib ( = 99; HR, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.7-1.8; = 0.66). In vemurafenib-treated patients, the cell-cycle gene signature was associated with shorter PFS. However, in cobimetinib combined with vemurafenib-treated patients, both cell cycle and immune signature subgroups had comparable PFS. Cobimetinib combined with vemurafenib may abrogate the adverse impact of the cell-cycle signature. .

摘要

评估了 - 突变黑色素瘤患者接受vemurafenib 或 cobimetinib 联合 vemurafenib 治疗时肿瘤基因表达谱与无进展生存期(PFS)结果的相关性。评估了四项试验(BRIM-2、BRIM-3、BRIM-7 和 coBRIM)中患者的存档肿瘤样本的基因表达。通过单变量 Cox 比例风险建模确定与 PFS 显著相关的基因(<0.05),然后进行无监督层次聚类、主成分分析和递归分区,以开发优化的基因特征。在 BRIM-2(=63)和 vemurafenib 臂的 BRIM-3(=160)中,有 46 个基因被确定为与 PFS 显著相关。确定了两个不同的特征:细胞周期和免疫。在接受 vemurafenib 治疗的患者中,与免疫特征相比,细胞周期特征与 BRIM-2/BRIM-3 训练集(危险比[HR]1.8;95%置信区间[CI],1.3-2.6,=0.0001)和 coBRIM 验证集中的 PFS 缩短相关(=101;HR,1.6;95%CI,1.0-2.5;=0.08)。在接受 cobimetinib 联合 vemurafenib 治疗的患者中,未观察到细胞周期特征对 PFS 的不利影响(=99;HR,1.1;95%CI,0.7-1.8;=0.66)。在接受 vemurafenib 治疗的患者中,细胞周期基因特征与较短的 PFS 相关。然而,在接受 cobimetinib 联合 vemurafenib 治疗的患者中,细胞周期和免疫特征亚组的 PFS 相当。Cobimetinib 联合 vemurafenib 可能会消除细胞周期特征的不利影响。

相似文献

1
Gene Expression Profiling in -Mutated Melanoma Reveals Patient Subgroups with Poor Outcomes to Vemurafenib That May Be Overcome by Cobimetinib Plus Vemurafenib.BRAF 突变型黑色素瘤的基因表达谱分析显示,vemurafenib 治疗预后不良的患者亚群可通过 cobimetinib 联合 vemurafenib 克服。
Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Sep 1;23(17):5238-5245. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-0172. Epub 2017 May 23.
2
Modeled Prognostic Subgroups for Survival and Treatment Outcomes in BRAF V600-Mutated Metastatic Melanoma: Pooled Analysis of 4 Randomized Clinical Trials.BRAF V600 突变型转移性黑色素瘤生存和治疗结局的建模预后亚组:4 项随机临床试验的汇总分析。
JAMA Oncol. 2018 Oct 1;4(10):1382-1388. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.2668.
3
Combined vemurafenib and cobimetinib in BRAF-mutated melanoma.联合维莫非尼和考比替尼治疗 BRAF 突变型黑色素瘤。
N Engl J Med. 2014 Nov 13;371(20):1867-76. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1408868. Epub 2014 Sep 29.
4
Impact of depth of response on survival in patients treated with cobimetinib ± vemurafenib: pooled analysis of BRIM-2, BRIM-3, BRIM-7 and coBRIM.考比替尼联合维莫非尼治疗患者的反应深度对生存的影响:BRIM-2、BRIM-3、BRIM-7 和 coBRIM 的汇总分析。
Br J Cancer. 2019 Oct;121(7):522-528. doi: 10.1038/s41416-019-0546-y. Epub 2019 Aug 16.
5
Cobimetinib combined with vemurafenib in advanced BRAF(V600)-mutant melanoma (coBRIM): updated efficacy results from a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial.考比替尼联合维莫非尼治疗晚期 BRAF(V600)突变型黑色素瘤(coBRIM):一项随机、双盲、III 期临床试验的更新疗效结果。
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Sep;17(9):1248-60. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30122-X. Epub 2016 Jul 30.
6
Combination of vemurafenib and cobimetinib in patients with advanced BRAF(V600)-mutated melanoma: a phase 1b study.维莫非尼联合考比替尼治疗晚期 BRAF(V600)突变型黑色素瘤患者的 1b 期研究。
Lancet Oncol. 2014 Aug;15(9):954-65. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70301-8. Epub 2014 Jul 15.
7
Incidence, course, and management of toxicities associated with cobimetinib in combination with vemurafenib in the coBRIM study.coBRIM 研究中考比替尼联合维莫非尼相关毒性的发生率、病程和处理。
Ann Oncol. 2017 May 1;28(5):1137-1144. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx040.
8
Cobimetinib Plus Vemurafenib: A Review in BRAF (V600) Mutation-Positive Unresectable or Metastatic Melanoma.考比替尼联合维莫非尼:BRAF(V600)突变阳性不可切除或转移性黑色素瘤的综述
Drugs. 2016 Apr;76(5):605-15. doi: 10.1007/s40265-016-0562-7.
9
Effect of concomitant dosing with acid-reducing agents and vemurafenib dose on survival in patients with BRAF mutation-positive metastatic melanoma treated with vemurafenib ± cobimetinib.接受维莫非尼±考比替尼治疗的 BRAF 突变阳性转移性黑色素瘤患者中,与酸还原剂同时给药和维莫非尼剂量对生存的影响。
Eur J Cancer. 2019 Jul;116:45-55. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.05.002. Epub 2019 Jun 4.
10
Indirect treatment comparison of dabrafenib plus trametinib versus vemurafenib plus cobimetinib in previously untreated metastatic melanoma patients.达拉非尼联合曲美替尼与维莫非尼联合考比替尼用于既往未治疗的转移性黑色素瘤患者的间接治疗比较
J Hematol Oncol. 2017 Jan 4;10(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s13045-016-0369-8.

引用本文的文献

1
COP1 Deficiency in BRAF Melanomas Confers Resistance to Inhibitors of the MAPK Pathway.BRAF 黑色素瘤中 COP1 缺陷赋予对 MAPK 通路抑制剂的抗性。
Cells. 2025 Jun 25;14(13):975. doi: 10.3390/cells14130975.
2
New small molecules in dermatology: for the autoimmunity, inflammation and beyond.皮肤病学中的新型小分子药物:针对自身免疫、炎症及其他领域。
Inflamm Res. 2023 Jun;72(6):1257-1274. doi: 10.1007/s00011-023-01744-w. Epub 2023 May 22.
3
Proliferation and Immune Response Gene Signatures Associated with Clinical Outcome to Immunotherapy and Targeted Therapy in Metastatic Cutaneous Malignant Melanoma.
与转移性皮肤恶性黑色素瘤免疫治疗和靶向治疗临床结局相关的增殖和免疫反应基因特征
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Jul 22;14(15):3587. doi: 10.3390/cancers14153587.
4
Role of Tumor-Infiltrating B Cells in Clinical Outcome of Patients with Melanoma Treated With Dabrafenib Plus Trametinib.肿瘤浸润 B 细胞在接受达拉非尼联合曲美替尼治疗的黑色素瘤患者临床结局中的作用。
Clin Cancer Res. 2021 Aug 15;27(16):4500-4510. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-3586. Epub 2021 Jun 9.
5
Synthetic lethality-mediated precision oncology via the tumor transcriptome.基于肿瘤转录组的合成致死性介导精准肿瘤学。
Cell. 2021 Apr 29;184(9):2487-2502.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.03.030. Epub 2021 Apr 14.
6
BRAF Gene and Melanoma: Back to the Future.BRAF 基因与黑色素瘤:回到未来。
Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Mar 27;22(7):3474. doi: 10.3390/ijms22073474.
7
Emerging Mutations in Cancer Progression and Their Possible Effects on Transcriptional Networks.癌症进展中的新出现突变及其对转录网络的可能影响。
Genes (Basel). 2020 Nov 12;11(11):1342. doi: 10.3390/genes11111342.
8
Mechanisms of Acquired BRAF Inhibitor Resistance in Melanoma: A Systematic Review.黑色素瘤中获得性BRAF抑制剂耐药机制:一项系统综述
Cancers (Basel). 2020 Sep 29;12(10):2801. doi: 10.3390/cancers12102801.
9
Paradox breaker BRAF inhibitors have comparable potency and MAPK pathway reactivation to encorafenib in BRAF mutant colorectal cancer.矛盾破解型BRAF抑制剂在BRAF突变型结直肠癌中具有与恩考芬尼相当的效力和MAPK通路再激活作用。
Oncotarget. 2020 Aug 25;11(34):3188-3197. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.27681.
10
Targeting Mutant in Pancreatic Cancer: Futile or Promising?靶向胰腺癌中的突变体:徒劳无功还是充满希望?
Biomedicines. 2020 Aug 11;8(8):281. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines8080281.